《四书改错》训诂研究

发布时间：2018-06-09 03:35

本文选题：毛奇龄 + 四书改错　；参考：《华中师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在清初学术史上,毛奇龄是个具有革命性的人物。他重视考据,提倡以经证经,不以空言说经,力求还原经文本义,开启了清初考据学之风。毛奇龄经学著述宏富,其中《四书改错》是他最后一部经学著作,代表了他经学的最高成就,也包含了他的训诂思想、训诂方法的精髓。本文从训诂角度对毛奇龄《四书改错》进行研究。通过分析毛奇龄《四书改错》纠驳朱熹《四书章句集注》的错处,阐明错误的原因,从而归纳出《四书改错》的训诂特点和训诂方法,并以现代学术眼光加以审视,以期对四书学的现代发展有所助益。全文共分五章：第一章,引论。介绍毛奇龄的生平,通过他的人生经历及治学经历分析《四书改错》的成书背景；介绍《四书改错》训诂研究的现状,论述其研究意义。第二章,《四书改错》对朱注训诂的纠驳。毛奇龄对朱熹注解进行评析时,既纠驳朱熹注解之误,同时又阐明朱熹注解出现错误的原因,从而为还原四书原义提供了参考。第三章,《四书改错》的训诂方法。毛奇龄纠驳朱熹注解之误,是通过运用一定的训诂方法实现的。其中既有分析语法、因声求义、据形索义等训诂方法,也有贯穿于毛奇龄经学研究的以经证经方法。第四章,《四书改错》的训诂特点。《四书改错》的训诂特点彰显了其训诂价值,对后人之训诂有参考和借鉴意义。第五章,《四书改错》训诂之评议。《四书改错》对朱熹《四书章句集注》的批评,有得当之处,亦有不当之处；从学术史的角度考察,有其功亦有其过。
[Abstract]:In the academic history of the early Qing Dynasty, Mao Qiling was a revolutionary figure. He attached great importance to textual research, advocated sutras, not empty words, trying to restore the original meaning of scriptures, opened the early Qing Dynasty textual research. Mao Qiling's writings on Classics are Hong Fu's. Among them, "four Books to correct mistakes" is his last work on classics, which represents the highest achievement in his studies and also contains his thought of exegesis. The quintessence of the exegesis method. This paper studies Mao Qiling four Books correcting mistakes from the perspective of exegesis. By analyzing the mistakes of Mao Qiling's "four Books and correcting mistakes", correcting the mistakes of Zhu Xi, expounding the causes of errors, this paper concludes the characteristics and methods of the exegesis of "four Books and correcting mistakes", and examines them from the modern academic point of view. This paper is divided into five chapters: chapter one, introduction. This paper introduces the life of Mao Qiling, analyzes the background of making a book through his life experience and his learning experience, and introduces the present situation of the study of exegesis. The second chapter, Correction of four Books to correct mistakes, the rebuttal of the exegesis of Zhu Notes. When Mao Qiling comments on Zhu Xi annotation, it not only corrects the error of Zhu Xi annotation, but also clarifies the causes of the error in Zhu Xi annotation, thus providing a reference for restoring the original meaning of the four books. Chapter three, the exegesis method of "four Books to correct mistakes". Mao Qiling corrects the error of Zhu Xi annotation by using a certain exegesis method. Among them, there are some exegetical methods, such as analyzing grammar, seeking meaning by sound, according to form and meaning, There are also the exegesis characteristics of "four Books and mistakes", which run through the study of Mao Qiling's Classics. Chapter IV, "four Books to correct mistakes", shows the value of its exegesis. Chapter five, comments on the exegesis of the four Books, the criticism of the four Books and the mistakes, the criticism of Zhu Xi, the Collection of sentences and sentences in the four Books, has both proper and improper aspects; from the point of view of academic history, it is not only appropriate, but also inappropriate to comment on the exegesis of later generations. There are merits and faults.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13

【参考文献】