韩汉空间维度词对比研究
本文选题:韩汉对比 + 空间维度词 ; 参考:《延边大学》2012年博士论文
【摘要】:认知语言学认为,从语义和语法上来说,空间表达比其他非空间表达更为基本’,空间范畴是语言中表达其他很多关系范畴的基础。空间维度形容词具有[+空间][+实体][+形状][+方向][+延伸]语义特征,与其他空间词语相比,其语义上的隐喻、转喻现象、构词方式以及句法特征都有着特殊之处。其特殊语义和用法在第二语言教学中也是难点之一。 本文以具有[+零维][+一维][+二维][+三维]特征的七组十四个韩汉空间维度形容词——“大/小”、“长/短”、“高/低”、“深/浅”、“宽/窄”、“厚/薄”、“粗/细”为研究对象,运用认知语言学的相关理论和方法进行了全面系统的分析,穷尽描写了韩汉空间维度词所包含的具体义项,概括分析它们之间存在的隐喻与转喻现象的异同以及隐喻与转喻路径的异同,对称与不对称现象,在二语习得中的一些制约因素。 本文共分八个部分:第一部分是绪论,介绍本文的选题意义、理论基础、研究方法及前人研究概况。第二部分界定韩汉空间维度的外延和内涵,对韩汉空间维度词进行语义分析。第三部分、第四部分、第五部分、第六部分对七组韩汉空间维度词进行详细的分析,系统地探讨韩汉空间维度词的基本义、转喻义和隐喻义的异同,进而考察了韩汉空间维度词对称与不对称问题。第七部分对韩汉空间维度词的二语习得情况以及现行教材情况进行分析比较。第八部分是结论。 本文对韩汉空间维度词的语义进行了系统的分析,通过细化其基本义的语义特征,揭示了基本义到转喻义、基本义到隐喻义、转喻义到隐喻义的语义扩展路径;对韩汉空间维度词的对称与不对称现象进行了全面的描写,并对其进行了合理的解释;以提高二语习得为主要目的对现行教材以及韩汉空间维度词习得序列进行了比较分析,在此基础上提出了教材教学建议。 本文对韩汉空间维度词进行全面而系统性的分析,弥补了相关研究的欠缺并为空间维度词的类型学研究提供了参考,而且在语义、构词、句法上的研究成果为现行教学提供了理论依据。
[Abstract]:Cognitive linguistics holds that spatial expression is more basic than other non spatial expressions in semantic and grammatical terms. Space category is the basis for the expression of many other relationships in language. Spatial dimension adjectives have the semantic features of [+ space] [+ entity] [+ shape] [+ direction] [+ extension], and their semantic implicit comparison with other spatial words. Metaphor, metonymy, word formation and syntactic features have their own characteristics. Their special semantics and usage are also difficult points in second language teaching.
In this paper, seven groups of fourteen Korean and Han spatial adjectives with [+ zero dimension] [+ 1] [+ 2-D] [+ 3] (+ D), "big / small", "long / short", "high / low", "deep / shallow", "wide / narrow", "thick / thin", "thick / thin" as the research object, were analyzed comprehensively and systematically by the related theories and methods of cognitive linguistics. The exhaustive description of the specific meanings contained in the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, generalizes the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy between them, the similarities and differences of metaphor and metonymy path, symmetry and asymmetry, and some restrictive factors in the acquisition of two language.
This article is divided into eight parts: the first part is the introduction, which introduces the significance of the topic, the theoretical basis, the research method and the previous research. The second part defines the extension and connotation of the spatial dimension of Han and Han Dynasties, and the semantic analysis of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties. The third part, fourth parts, fifth parts, and the sixth part of the seven groups of Korean and Han space dimensions. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the basic meaning of the spatial dimension words of Han and Han Dynasties, the similarities and differences between the meaning and the metaphorical meaning, and then examines the symmetry and asymmetry of the spatial dimension words in the Han and Han Dynasties. The seventh part analyzes and compares the two language acquisition of the Korean and Han spatial dimensions and the current situation of the textbooks. The eighth part is the conclusion.
This paper makes a systematic analysis of the semantic meaning of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. Through the refinement of the semantic features of their basic meanings, it reveals the basic meaning, the basic meaning, the metaphorical meaning, the metaphorical meaning and the semantic extension path of metaphorical meaning, and the symmetry and asymmetry of the Korean and Han spatial dimension words, and the combination of them. In order to improve the two language acquisition, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the current teaching materials and the acquisition sequence of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties. On the basis of this, it puts forward the teaching suggestions of the teaching materials.
This paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the spatial dimension words in Han and Han Dynasties, which makes up the lack of related research and provides a reference for the study of the typology of space dimension words, and the research results in semantics, word formation and syntax provide a theoretical basis for the current teaching.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H136;H55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖菲;“大”与“小”语法功能上的差异性[J];兵团教育学院学报;2003年01期
2 王晶;;英汉“近”的空间隐喻认知对比研究[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
3 朱德熙;;自指和转指——汉语名词化标记“的、者、所、之”的语法功能和语义功能[J];方言;1983年01期
4 孙敏庆;;俄汉语空间维度词“大/小”隐喻义对比分析[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2009年03期
5 谷晓恒,李晓云;“数词+大+名词”短语浅探[J];汉语学习;2005年05期
6 吴念阳;杨艳芳;刘剑;;儿童书面语空间维度词“高/低”隐喻域的认知[J];集美大学学报(教育科学版);2007年03期
7 王红娟;;空间维度词“深、浅”的认知诠释[J];科技信息;2006年S4期
8 任永军,滕向农;空间维度词“深、浅”的认知语义分析[J];柳州师专学报;2001年04期
9 刘正光;;认知语言学的语言观与外语教学的基本原则[J];外语研究;2010年01期
10 段益民;从单音反义形容词的句法失衡看聚合组合的多元对应[J];宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年03期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 陈家旭;英汉隐喻认知对比研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
2 陈万会;中国学习者二语词汇习得认知心理研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
3 郑Y靛,
本文编号:2035373
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2035373.html