论不同社会背景人士在微博评论中的语言特征差异
发布时间:2018-07-02 06:59
本文选题:语域理论 + 微博 ; 参考:《武汉理工大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:互联网的迅速发展孕育出了一种新的网络交流平台:微博。微博能让人了解到周围发生的事物,同时人们也能通过自己的微博对社会上的重大事件进行评论。在微博中,不同社会背景的人士将会表现出不同的语言特点。语域理论能为此提供依据。根据这一点,作者试图探究不同社会背景人士在微博评论中的语言特征差异。 近年,关于有毒乳制品以及有毒胶囊等事件在网络上掀起轩然大波。这两件事情关乎民生,人们对这些事件给予了极高的关注度并在微博上做出评论。由于客观原因限制,作者在微博上随机抽取了100个对此话题发表过评论的名人微博,并发放了问卷调查100位随机抽取的普通民众。作者通过数据分析试图探究以下话题:相较于名人,普通民众是否更易在微博上对重大事件发表评论?普通民众与名人相比,哪一类群体会在评论社会事件中用的更多的讽刺语气?普通民众在微博中表达情感的方式与名人相比有何不同?相较于名人,普通人是否更容易在微博评论中使用禁忌语?名人与普通人中,谁更有可能在微博评论中使用粗俗语言?名人与普通人相比,哪类人群更易使用加强性词语?对于这些社会事件,名人是否更倾向于给出一些建议? 通过对于数据的分析,作者发现在微博上透露个人信息越多的用户语言特征趋于文明,有深度,不会随意流露不满情绪。如名人用户,这类人群的微博会被新浪公司公示其真实姓名与职业信息。反之,普通人群的微博不会被新浪公司身份认证且他们并不会在微博上透露自己的个人信息,所以他们在评论社会重大事件当中则表现的直接甚至粗俗。 作者将这一现象归因于社会责任承担感,心理因素以及经济因素。这里作者发现了一个值得关注的现象:越来越多的名人将自己的微博变成了一种宣传手段已达到为个人带来利益的目的。经济利益与语言之间的关系,这一话题值得进一步探究。 总之,这篇论文基于语域理论探究了不同社会背景人士在微博评论中不同的语言差异,更旨在通过此论文说明微博实名制推行的重要意义。如若微博实名制得以推行将更加有利于和谐网络环境的建立。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet gives birth to a new network communication platform: Weibo. Weibo lets people know what's going on around them, and people can comment on major events in society through their own Weibo. In Weibo, people from different social backgrounds will show different language characteristics. Register theory can provide basis for this. Based on this, the author attempts to explore the differences in linguistic characteristics of different social backgrounds in Weibo comments. In recent years, on toxic dairy products and toxic capsules and other incidents in the Internet caused a great uproar. These two things are about people's lives, and people are paying a lot of attention to them and commenting on them on Weibo. Due to the limitation of objective reasons, the author randomly selected 100 celebrity Weibo who had commented on the topic on Weibo, and sent out a questionnaire survey to 100 randomly selected ordinary people. The author tries to explore the following topics through data analysis: is it easier for ordinary people to comment on major events on Weibo than celebrities? Which group of ordinary people is more sarcastic in commenting on social events than celebrities? How do ordinary people express their feelings in Weibo in a different way than celebrities? Is it easier for ordinary people to use taboo words in Weibo reviews than celebrities? Who is more likely to use vulgar language in Weibo reviews among celebrities and ordinary people? Which groups of celebrities are more likely to use reinforcement terms than ordinary people? Are celebrities more likely to give advice on these social events? Through the analysis of the data, the author finds that the more personal information is revealed on Weibo, the more user language features tend to be civilized, have depth, and do not show disaffection at will. For celebrity users, their Weibo will be published by Sina Corporation with their real name and occupation information. On the other hand, the Weibo of the general population is not authenticated by Sina and they do not disclose their personal information on Weibo, so they are direct or even vulgar in their comments on major social events. The author ascribes this phenomenon to the sense of social responsibility, psychological factors and economic factors. Here the author finds a noteworthy phenomenon: a growing number of celebrities have turned their Weibo into a propaganda tool for personal gain. The relationship between economic interests and language deserves further exploration. In a word, based on the register theory, this paper explores the linguistic differences between different social backgrounds in Weibo reviews, and aims to illustrate the significance of the implementation of the Weibo real-name system through this paper. If the Weibo real-name system can be implemented will be more conducive to the establishment of a harmonious network environment.
【学位授予单位】:武汉理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H15;G206
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陈光明;;从网络语言缩略语看网络语言的后现代特征[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2008年02期
2 吴莉;;心理空间理论关照下的语篇分析认知图式解读[J];外语学刊;2006年03期
3 苏晓军;;国外认知诗学研究概观[J];外国语文;2009年02期
4 施春宏;语言调节与语言变异(上)[J];语文建设;1999年04期
,本文编号:2089302
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2089302.html