卡西尔语言观评析
发布时间：2018-07-21 11:06
【摘要】：自哲学诞生以来，语言问题一直都是困扰着哲学家们的斯芬克斯之谜，虽然历代先哲穷其一生试图解开这一谜团，但都无功而返。传统哲学把语言当作一种实体去探讨，并因此把语言当作阻碍认识得以可能的迷雾。直至当代语言哲学的转向，语言问题更是被看成了哲学问题本身，语言被放在了哲学的首位，越来越受到哲学家们的重视。但是对于语言问题的解决却呈现了两条道路，一条道路是英美分析哲学，他们追求语言意义的精确性，从而主张采用逻辑分析的方式使语言科学化。另一条道路是欧陆人文哲学，他们突出语言的本体论地位，竭尽全力试图消除语言的逻辑功能，把语言从逻辑规则的压迫下解放出来。而在这些欧陆人文哲学中，卡西尔的语言哲学尤有特色。 在卡西尔看来，我们解决语言的谜题应该像俄狄浦斯解决斯芬克斯之谜所使用的方法一样：认识你自己。于是卡西尔诚心诚意地接受了康德的哥白尼革命的理论思想，认为对于语言问题同样需要从人出发去考察。卡西尔通过对传统哲学的批判，认为语言绝不是一种实体性存在，语言是一种先于逻辑的存在，语言问题不可能凭借逻辑的分析得到揭示，语言只有从其本身出发才能得到真正的揭示。卡西尔认为只有对语言问题进行这样一番探究，我们才能回答语言的统一性问题，才能对哲学上关于存在与现象、主体与客体的二元分立问题找到解决的出路，只有通过语言我们才能真正揭示出人类特有的精神本质，也只有通过语言才能揭示出人与世界关系的真正面貌。因此，本文拟从以下几个方面对卡西尔的语言哲学展开分析，以展示当代语言哲学解决语言问题的独特风貌。 论文第一部分首先通过卡西尔对传统语言哲学的批判，揭示出传统语言哲学所面临的各种问题，继而论述了康德、洪堡等人对于这些问题的解决以及自身所面临的问题，最后卡西尔通过对上述理论的批判继承提出了自己的语言哲学。 论文的第二部分揭示出对语言是什么的问题的解决,首先应该解决的是存在是什么的问题，而对形式概念的论述可以看出，，解决语言问题的出发点就是形式原则，最后对表达之感知的论述揭示出语言的源出状态。 论文的第三部分通过对语言概念和逻辑概念的区别以及语言的隐喻特性进行论述，揭示出卡西尔如何把语言从传统逻辑的束缚中解放出来，以及为何语言的逻辑对于传统逻辑具有优先性。 论文的第四部分通过对卡西尔语言现象学的论述，语言作为中介的观念也就被提了出来。进而论述语言作为中介是如何架起人与世界的桥梁的。 论文的最后则重点论述了卡西尔语言哲学的理论意义以及其局限性。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of philosophy, the problem of language has been a mystery to philosophers. Traditional philosophy regards language as a kind of entity to explore, and therefore regards language as a fog that hinders the possibility of cognition. Until the turn of contemporary philosophy of language, the question of language is regarded as the question of philosophy itself, language is put in the first place of philosophy, and is paid more and more attention by philosophers. However, there are two ways to solve the language problem, one is Anglo-American analytical philosophy, which pursues the accuracy of language meaning, and thus advocates the use of logical analysis to make language scientific. The other way is European humanistic philosophy. They stress the ontological status of language, try their best to eliminate the logical function of language and liberate language from the oppression of logical rules. In these European humanistic philosophy, Cassier's philosophy of language has its own characteristics. In Cassier's view, we should solve language puzzles the way Oedipus solved the Sphinx riddle: know yourself. Cassirer accepted Kant's theory of the Copernican Revolution and believed that language should also be examined from the point of view of man. By criticizing traditional philosophy, Cassier thinks that language is not a kind of entity existence, language is a kind of existence before logic, language problems can not be revealed by the analysis of logic. Language can only be revealed from its own point of view. Cassier believes that only by making such an inquiry into language can we answer the question of the unity of language and find a way to solve the dualistic problem of existence and phenomenon, subject and object in philosophy. It is only through language that we can truly reveal the unique spiritual essence of human beings, and that only through language can we reveal the true face of the relationship between man and the world. Therefore, this paper analyzes Cassier's philosophy of language from the following aspects in order to show the unique features of contemporary philosophy of language in solving language problems. In the first part of the thesis, through Cassier's criticism of traditional language philosophy, it reveals the various problems faced by traditional language philosophy, and then discusses the solutions to these problems and the problems faced by Kant, Humboldt and others. Finally, Cassirer puts forward his own philosophy of language through the criticism and inheritance of the above theory. The second part of the thesis reveals that the solution to the problem of what language is, the first thing should be solved is what the existence is, and the discussion of the concept of form can see that the starting point of solving the problem of language is the principle of form. Finally, the discourse on the perception of expression reveals the source state of language. The third part of the thesis discusses the differences between the concepts of language and logic and the metaphorical characteristics of language, and reveals how Cassier liberates language from the shackles of traditional logic. And why language logic has priority over traditional logic. In the fourth part of the thesis, the concept of language as an intermediary is raised through the exposition of Cassier's linguistic phenomenology. Then it discusses how language, as an intermediary, builds the bridge between man and the world. At the end of the thesis, the theoretical significance and limitations of Cassier's philosophy of language are discussed.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H0-05
本文编号：2135324
[Abstract]:Since the birth of philosophy, the problem of language has been a mystery to philosophers. Traditional philosophy regards language as a kind of entity to explore, and therefore regards language as a fog that hinders the possibility of cognition. Until the turn of contemporary philosophy of language, the question of language is regarded as the question of philosophy itself, language is put in the first place of philosophy, and is paid more and more attention by philosophers. However, there are two ways to solve the language problem, one is Anglo-American analytical philosophy, which pursues the accuracy of language meaning, and thus advocates the use of logical analysis to make language scientific. The other way is European humanistic philosophy. They stress the ontological status of language, try their best to eliminate the logical function of language and liberate language from the oppression of logical rules. In these European humanistic philosophy, Cassier's philosophy of language has its own characteristics. In Cassier's view, we should solve language puzzles the way Oedipus solved the Sphinx riddle: know yourself. Cassirer accepted Kant's theory of the Copernican Revolution and believed that language should also be examined from the point of view of man. By criticizing traditional philosophy, Cassier thinks that language is not a kind of entity existence, language is a kind of existence before logic, language problems can not be revealed by the analysis of logic. Language can only be revealed from its own point of view. Cassier believes that only by making such an inquiry into language can we answer the question of the unity of language and find a way to solve the dualistic problem of existence and phenomenon, subject and object in philosophy. It is only through language that we can truly reveal the unique spiritual essence of human beings, and that only through language can we reveal the true face of the relationship between man and the world. Therefore, this paper analyzes Cassier's philosophy of language from the following aspects in order to show the unique features of contemporary philosophy of language in solving language problems. In the first part of the thesis, through Cassier's criticism of traditional language philosophy, it reveals the various problems faced by traditional language philosophy, and then discusses the solutions to these problems and the problems faced by Kant, Humboldt and others. Finally, Cassirer puts forward his own philosophy of language through the criticism and inheritance of the above theory. The second part of the thesis reveals that the solution to the problem of what language is, the first thing should be solved is what the existence is, and the discussion of the concept of form can see that the starting point of solving the problem of language is the principle of form. Finally, the discourse on the perception of expression reveals the source state of language. The third part of the thesis discusses the differences between the concepts of language and logic and the metaphorical characteristics of language, and reveals how Cassier liberates language from the shackles of traditional logic. And why language logic has priority over traditional logic. In the fourth part of the thesis, the concept of language as an intermediary is raised through the exposition of Cassier's linguistic phenomenology. Then it discusses how language, as an intermediary, builds the bridge between man and the world. At the end of the thesis, the theoretical significance and limitations of Cassier's philosophy of language are discussed.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H0-05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 柯素芬;;文化哲学的自觉与终结:卡西尔的符号多元面相[J];湖南社会科学;2011年02期
2 张杰;;语言建构了世界——对卡西尔《人论》语言观的一种文化人类学解读[J];贵州社会科学;2010年09期
3 易晓明;语言与文类中的意识形态指涉——弗莱的意识形态理论[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年02期
4 钟丽茜;坐看云起——重建语言的隐喻世界[J];江西社会科学;2002年11期
5 刘友红;;语言:人类文化创造的总体维度——卡西尔语言哲学研究[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年01期
6 孙慧;;在现代西方哲学语言转向中重新审视卡西尔[J];理论月刊;2012年09期
7 耿菲菲;;语言哲学的域限:在文化视野内[J];外语学刊;2008年04期
8 郑辟瑞;;语言与现象学的还原——现象学家如何自我言说[J];人文杂志;2009年01期
9 倪梁康;;语言哲学的基本问题:结构还是生成?——卡西尔与海德格尔对洪堡思想的不同解读[J];学海;2008年02期
10 何萍;;论卡西尔的符号形式哲学[J];学海;2010年04期
本文编号：2135324
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2135324.html
