《环球时报》国内议题社评研究（2009.4-2014.3）
发布时间：2018-07-22 16:59
【摘要】：《环球时报》是中国最具争议的报刊。该报一直以来都以极具民族主义色彩的国际报道为学术界所批判。近几年来，《环球时报》逐渐将报道内容转向国内，并在2009年3月创办了社评栏目。在当下社会转型加速的历史背景下，中国社会阶层矛盾突出，公众急切渴望社会变革。但《环球时报》屡次在社评中发表独家观点，以维护国家总体利益之名为当权者辩解，为维护现行社会体制稳定而罔顾事实的行为遭到了部分公众的强烈批判。 本文以2009年4月到2014年3月间的《环球时报》国内议题社评文章为研究对象，，分选题和立论两个部分对该报的国内议题社评文章进行研究，重点分析该报社评话语背后隐含价值偏向。通过对《环球时报》国内议题社评文章选题特征的分析，以及对该报评论内容进行话语分析，笔者梳理出《环球时报》社评以国家利益至上、舆论导向至上的办报理念，以及推行渐进式改革的政治观。在此基础上，对《环球时报》引发公众批判的深层社会原因进行分析，得出转型期社会矛盾突出，公众政治认同缺失是公众反感《环球时报》的外部原因。
[Abstract]:The Global Times is the most controversial newspaper in China. The paper has long been criticized by academics for its nationalist international coverage. In recent years, the Global Times has gradually shifted its coverage to China and founded its editorial program in March 2009. Under the historical background of accelerating social transformation, the social stratum contradiction in China is prominent, and the public is eager for social change. However, the Global Times has repeatedly made an exclusive point of view in its editorial, in the name of defending the general interests of the country as the defense of those in power, and in order to maintain the stability of the current social system, the act of ignoring the facts has been strongly criticized by some members of the public. This paper studies the domestic issue editorial articles of the Global Times from April 2009 to March 2014, which is divided into two parts: topic selection and argumentation. This paper focuses on the analysis of the implied value bias behind the editorial discourse of the newspaper. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of the selected topics of the Global Times domestic topic editorial articles and the discourse analysis of the commentary content of the newspaper, the author sorts out the idea that the Global Times editorial is based on the supremacy of national interests and public opinion. And the political view of carrying out progressive reform. On this basis, the author analyzes the deep social reasons that caused the criticism of the public by the Global Times, and draws a conclusion that the social contradictions in the transition period are prominent, and the lack of public political identity is the external cause of public aversion to the Global Times.
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H15;G212
本文编号：2138143
[Abstract]:The Global Times is the most controversial newspaper in China. The paper has long been criticized by academics for its nationalist international coverage. In recent years, the Global Times has gradually shifted its coverage to China and founded its editorial program in March 2009. Under the historical background of accelerating social transformation, the social stratum contradiction in China is prominent, and the public is eager for social change. However, the Global Times has repeatedly made an exclusive point of view in its editorial, in the name of defending the general interests of the country as the defense of those in power, and in order to maintain the stability of the current social system, the act of ignoring the facts has been strongly criticized by some members of the public. This paper studies the domestic issue editorial articles of the Global Times from April 2009 to March 2014, which is divided into two parts: topic selection and argumentation. This paper focuses on the analysis of the implied value bias behind the editorial discourse of the newspaper. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of the selected topics of the Global Times domestic topic editorial articles and the discourse analysis of the commentary content of the newspaper, the author sorts out the idea that the Global Times editorial is based on the supremacy of national interests and public opinion. And the political view of carrying out progressive reform. On this basis, the author analyzes the deep social reasons that caused the criticism of the public by the Global Times, and draws a conclusion that the social contradictions in the transition period are prominent, and the lack of public political identity is the external cause of public aversion to the Global Times.
【学位授予单位】：四川外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H15;G212
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 杨森;中国社会转型的特殊性分析[J];甘肃社会科学;2003年01期
2 谭德宇,冉兴国,谭大友;邓小平政治价值论研究[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期
3 马少华;“社评”的选择——一种评论史角度的现实观察[J];新闻界;2002年04期
4 杨昕;;中国共产党意识形态话语权的构成要素及其实现[J];湖北行政学院学报;2013年03期
5 沈立新,高宏久;社会转型与社会矛盾[J];上海党史与党建;2005年03期
6 杜骏飞;;我们为什么而新闻?——关于《环球时报》风波的三个问题[J];新闻记者;2011年09期
7 胡锡进;;环球时报社评是怎么写出来的[J];新闻与写作;2011年05期
8 马少华;;自信心与危机感——谈谈环球时报社评中的两个主题[J];新闻与写作;2012年06期
9 吴晓明;;新媒体传播中的社会舆论场综合考察[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年03期
10 李兰芬;;我国道德话语权的现状及其对策建议——基于苏州企业家的调查[J];哲学动态;2008年09期
本文编号：2138143
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2138143.html
