申论写作语言特点分析
发布时间：2018-07-25 13:27
【摘要】：申论是近十年来国家及地方公务员录用考试所采用的一种新型题型。考生通过对所给材料进行概括、分析、论述等，按要求写成不同类型的公务文体，以此作为评分依据。由于参加公务员考试的人数逐年增加，所以，针对公务员考试出现的书籍也是数不胜数。不过，从写作语言学角度对申论写作进行分析的著作很少。本文旨在从写作语言学的角度，，对申论的语言特点进行分析。 本文共分为四大部分。第一部分引言，主要介绍申论写作的渊源、概况和发展。在这一部分中，笔者首先阐述了选题的初衷，即从写作语言学的角度分析申论的语言特点；其次，对“申论”一词追根溯源，说明了将申论作为公务员考试科目是有历史依据的，最后介绍了申论考试的总体情况：题型设置、考试环节及发展趋向等。 第二部分为申论写作语言运用的宏观策略，即从智力素养方面进行探讨，主要研究写作主体的认识机制、思维机制及心理机制三个方面。重点探讨主体的政治素养、理论素养、世界观等因素对主体进行申论写作的影响。 第三部分为申论写作语言运用的中观策略，笔者试从考生在申论写作过程中的能力发挥角度进行分析，就审题策略、阅读策略、写作策略分别提出阅读能力的培养、归纳概括能力的培养、综合分析能力的培养等能力素养进行了分析和解构。 第四部分为申论写作语言运用的微观策略，主要是从申论写作的语言特点进行分析，分析了申论写作在词汇、句式、修辞等方面的特点。这一部分是本文写作的重点，也是本文写作的出发点，即从写作语言学的角度来分析申论语言特点；虽然每个人都有组织语言的个性特色，但是作为考试文章，而且是公务员考试文章，申论写作的语言有着浓厚的公文色彩，同时也具有政治性、实用性等特点，本文将从词汇、句式和修辞方面，分别进行分析。 笔者希望这篇论文，可以为大家了解、学习申论写作起到一定作用，并且为写作语言学的丰富发展尽一份绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:Argumentation is a new type of examination for civil servants in recent ten years. By summarizing, analyzing and discussing the materials given, the examinee writes different types of official style according to the requirements, which is used as the basis for scoring. As the number of people taking the Civil Service examination increases year by year, there are countless books on the Civil Service examination. However, there are few works on the analysis of argumentative writing from the perspective of writing linguistics. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the linguistic characteristics of argumentation from the perspective of writing linguistics. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the origin, general situation and development of the theory writing. In this part, the author first expounds the original intention of the topic, that is, from the perspective of writing linguistics to analyze the linguistic characteristics of the theory, and secondly, to trace back to the source of the word "theory of explanation". This paper explains the historical basis of taking the theory of representation as the subject of the civil servant examination, and finally introduces the general situation of the examination of the theory of representation: the setting of questions, the link of examination and the development trend, and so on. The second part is the macroscopical strategy of the use of the writing language of the theory, that is, from the aspect of intellectual literacy, it mainly studies the cognitive mechanism, the thinking mechanism and the psychological mechanism of the writing subject. This paper mainly discusses the influence of political accomplishment, theory accomplishment, world outlook and other factors on subject's argumentative writing. The third part is the medium strategy of the application of the writing language. The author tries to analyze the ability of examinees in the process of writing, and put forward the cultivation of reading ability, including examination strategy, reading strategy and writing strategy. The cultivation of generalizing ability and comprehensive analysis ability are analyzed and deconstructed. The fourth part is the micro strategy of the use of discourse writing language, mainly from the analysis of the language characteristics of the theory writing, analysis of the characteristics of theory writing in vocabulary, sentence structure, rhetoric, and so on. This part is the focal point of this thesis and the starting point of this thesis, which is to analyze the characteristics of argumentative language from the perspective of writing linguistics. Moreover, it is the civil servant examination article, the language of the argumentation writing has the thick official document color, but also has the political, practical and so on characteristic, this article will carry on the analysis separately from the vocabulary, the sentence pattern and the rhetoric aspect. The author hopes that this paper can help us understand and learn from the theory of argumentation and contribute to the rich development of writing linguistics.
【学位授予单位】：山西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H152.3
本文编号：2143965
[Abstract]:Argumentation is a new type of examination for civil servants in recent ten years. By summarizing, analyzing and discussing the materials given, the examinee writes different types of official style according to the requirements, which is used as the basis for scoring. As the number of people taking the Civil Service examination increases year by year, there are countless books on the Civil Service examination. However, there are few works on the analysis of argumentative writing from the perspective of writing linguistics. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the linguistic characteristics of argumentation from the perspective of writing linguistics. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the origin, general situation and development of the theory writing. In this part, the author first expounds the original intention of the topic, that is, from the perspective of writing linguistics to analyze the linguistic characteristics of the theory, and secondly, to trace back to the source of the word "theory of explanation". This paper explains the historical basis of taking the theory of representation as the subject of the civil servant examination, and finally introduces the general situation of the examination of the theory of representation: the setting of questions, the link of examination and the development trend, and so on. The second part is the macroscopical strategy of the use of the writing language of the theory, that is, from the aspect of intellectual literacy, it mainly studies the cognitive mechanism, the thinking mechanism and the psychological mechanism of the writing subject. This paper mainly discusses the influence of political accomplishment, theory accomplishment, world outlook and other factors on subject's argumentative writing. The third part is the medium strategy of the application of the writing language. The author tries to analyze the ability of examinees in the process of writing, and put forward the cultivation of reading ability, including examination strategy, reading strategy and writing strategy. The cultivation of generalizing ability and comprehensive analysis ability are analyzed and deconstructed. The fourth part is the micro strategy of the use of discourse writing language, mainly from the analysis of the language characteristics of the theory writing, analysis of the characteristics of theory writing in vocabulary, sentence structure, rhetoric, and so on. This part is the focal point of this thesis and the starting point of this thesis, which is to analyze the characteristics of argumentative language from the perspective of writing linguistics. Moreover, it is the civil servant examination article, the language of the argumentation writing has the thick official document color, but also has the political, practical and so on characteristic, this article will carry on the analysis separately from the vocabulary, the sentence pattern and the rhetoric aspect. The author hopes that this paper can help us understand and learn from the theory of argumentation and contribute to the rich development of writing linguistics.
【学位授予单位】：山西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H152.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈翼霞;;论“申论”考试与《写作》教学[J];经济与社会发展;2006年12期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 郭宇程;《申论》写作主体研究[D];福建师范大学;2007年
本文编号：2143965
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2143965.html
