韩国语对立转折复句在汉语中的对应研究

发布时间：2018-08-01 16:25

【摘要】：复句是由两个或两个以上意义上有一定联系、结构上互不包含的单句形式组成的句子,此时单句为复句的分句,主要连接手段是连接语尾。而连接语尾是指用来连接谓词、谓词性短语或分句,表示所连接成分之间关系的语尾。对立关系复句的分句之间为对立关系,而将之连接起来的语法单位则为表示对立转折关系的连接语尾。所以要掌握对立关系复句,应该从连接语尾开始。本文从表示对立转折关系的连接语尾入手,以具有代表性的“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”为中心,在语义、句法以及汉语中的对应关系等层面对四者分别进行了分析,进而对四者间异同进行了比较。分析其相同点和不同点,以期对韩国语的学习者在四者的使用方面给予一定的帮助。本文通过对比与分析,得出以下结论：第一,四者在语义层面上所表达的对立转折意义是不同的。在对立关系连接语尾的使用中,“(?)”和“(?)”是首当其冲并且最具代表性的连接语尾,其中在书面语的使用方面尤以“(?)”最为普遍和常用。而连接语尾“(?)”和“(?)”所表达的对立转折意味相对较弱,而“(?)”在实际使用中出现的频率也较低。第二,连接语尾“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,他们四者在句法特点上,在同一主语的制约,谓语的制约,时制语尾的制约以及叙述法的制约等四个方面具有不同特点,受到制约的数量和程度也不尽相同,这样就为对他们之间进行比较分析创造了条件。第三,通过语义、句法和汉语中对应等方面的分析可以看出,四者中“(?)”和“(?)”不管是在语义、句法或是在汉语对应层面具有很多的共同点,在大部分情况下都能进行互换,但也存在不通用的情况：“(?)”在先行词为现在时态的时候使用上会显得不自然。“(?)”和“(?)”在语义上表达的对立意义相对于“(?)”和“(?)”较弱,但“(?)”在句法方面又受到较多制约,并且经常出现后一分句使用表示否定意义的词或否定句型,所以两者的不同点较为突出。
[Abstract]:A complex sentence is a sentence made up of two or more than two meanings in which a single sentence is not included in the structure. At this time, a single sentence is a clause of a compound sentence, and the main connection means the end of the connection. The end of the connection refers to the end of the predicate, the phrase or the clause, the relation between the components connected. The grammatical units, which are connected together, are the connectives of the opposing turning relations. Therefore, to master the compound sentence of the opposite relationship, it should start from the end of the connection.
This paper, starting with the end of the connection of the opposing turning relationship, analyzes the four parties in the context of semantic, syntactic and Chinese correspondence with the representative "(?)", "(?)" and "(?)" and then compares the similarities and differences between the four. Learners of language can give some help in the use of the four.
Through comparison and analysis, this paper draws the following conclusions:
In the semantic level, the meaning of the opposing turning point is different. In the use of the end of the connection of the opposite relationship, "(?)" and "(?)" are the first and most representative connectives, especially in the use of the written language "(?)" the most common and common. And the connection of the end of the word "(?)" and "(?)". The opposite turn of the Da means relatively weak, and the frequency of "(") appears in practice is also low.
Second, "(?)", "(?)", "(?)", "(?)", their four in the syntactic characteristics, in the same subject, the restriction of the predicate, the restriction of the time system and the restriction of the narrative method, the number and degree of restriction are different, so that the comparison between them is to compare the differences between them. Analysis creates conditions.
Third, through the analysis of semantic, syntactic and Chinese correspondence, we can see that "(?)" and "(?)" in the semantic, syntactic or Chinese corresponding layer mask have many common points, in most cases can be exchanged, but also in the non general situation: "(?)" in the present tense of the antecedent words. "(?)" and "(?)" in the semantic expression of the opposite meaning relative to "(?)" and "(?") is weaker, but "(?)" in the syntactic aspects of more constraints, and often appear after the use of negative meaning words or negative sentence patterns, so the two different points are more prominent.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H55;H146

【共引文献】