西方翻译“三模式”说批评—兼论“路德模式”

发布时间：2018-08-03 18:18

【摘要】：20世纪80年代，，以比利时翻译家安德烈·勒弗维尔和英国翻译家苏珊·巴斯奈特为代表的文化学派提出了翻译研究中的“文化转向”。他们在考察西方翻译史和翻译理论史时，总结出翻译的三种模式：“哲罗姆模式”、“贺拉斯模式”和“施莱尔马赫模式”。“哲罗姆模式”强调原文的核心地位，因而，译者应尽可能忠实地再现原文。“贺拉斯模式”认为翻译的基本原则并非体现在译者对所译文本的忠实,而是忠实于译者的“客户”,因而“客户”成了译者的主要考虑因素，“协商”遂成为翻译的核心概念。“施莱尔马赫模式”突出翻译中“异化”的重要性，认为翻译的目的是为了把目的语读者带到国外去旅行。“三模式”说在西方翻译研究界流行开来，被很多翻译研究者所引用,反对的声音几乎听不到。有个别中国学者对这种认识提出过质疑。遗憾的是，没有更多学者对“三模式”说展开深入研究。本文作者经过认真研读西方翻译史，发现“三模式”说在时间维度、时代思潮、翻译方法、原文观、译者的地位和翻译的本质诸方面存在不足。本文拟对“三模式”说进行深入研究，采用对比分析方法文本分析方法和历时与共时相结合的方法，旨在批评“贺拉斯模式”，并提出“路德模式”取而代之。本文共五章。第一章是绪论，介绍本研究的背景、意义、目的、研究方法及写作框架。第二章为文献综述，介绍西方翻译研究传统，勒弗维尔和巴斯奈特的翻译思想和合作成果，介绍他们提出的“三模式”。第三章探讨“三模式”说的不足，重点分析“贺拉斯模式”在时间维度、时代思潮、翻译方法、原文观、译者的地位和翻译的本质诸方面的不妥。第四章通过分析圣经翻译家马丁·路德的翻译思想、翻译实践及其历史影响，总结出“路德模式”，并对“路德模式”和“贺拉斯模式”进行比较。第五章为本文结论，认为“三模式”的提法缺乏真正的系统性，“贺拉斯模式”不足以构成一种“模式”，建议以“路德模式”取代之。
[Abstract]:In the 1980s, the cultural school represented by the Belgian translator Andrei Leverville and the English translator Susan Bassnett put forward the "cultural turn" in translation studies. When they examine the history of western translation and translation theory, they summarize the three modes of translation: the "Jelome Model", "Horace Model" and "Schlermah Model". The Jerome Model emphasizes the core position of the original text, therefore, the translator should reproduce the original text faithfully as much as possible. Horace Mode holds that the basic principle of translation is not the translator's faithfulness to the translated text, but to the translator's "customer", so the "customer" has become the translator's main consideration. Therefore, negotiation becomes the core concept of translation. Schlermach Model highlights the importance of "alienation" in translation, and argues that the purpose of translation is to take the target language readers abroad. The theory of "three models" has gained popularity in western translation studies and has been cited by many translation researchers. Some Chinese scholars have questioned this understanding. Unfortunately, no more scholars have carried out in-depth research on the "three models" theory. After a careful study of the history of Western translation, the author finds that the theory of "three models" is deficient in time dimension, trend of thought, translation method, source view, translator's position and the essence of translation. This article intends to carry on the thorough research to the "three modes" theory, uses the contrast analysis method? Text analysis and diachronic and synchronic methods aim at criticizing Horace Model and proposing Luther Model instead. There are five chapters in this paper. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the background, significance, purpose, research methods and writing framework of this study. The second chapter is a literature review, which introduces the tradition of western translation studies, the translation thoughts and cooperative achievements of Levell and Bassnett, and their "three models". Chapter three discusses the deficiency of the theory of "three modes", and analyzes the defects of Horace mode in terms of time dimension, trend of thought, translation method, source view, translator's position and the essence of translation. Chapter four summarizes the Luther Model by analyzing the translation thought, translation practice and historical influence of Martin Luther, and compares Luther Model with Horace Model. The fifth chapter is the conclusion of this paper that the formulation of "three modes" lacks real systematicness, and that "Horace mode" is not enough to form a "model", which is suggested to be replaced by "Luther model".
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H059

【参考文献】