法律语篇中的名物化隐喻研究
发布时间：2018-08-06 20:17
【摘要】：名物化在各类语篇尤其是在书面语篇中大量存在并起着多种功能。名物化在法律语篇中的应用也十分广泛。法律语篇通常指法律、法规、条例、协议、判决等法律界通用的书面语言。国内外有关名词化隐喻的研究主要集中于名物化隐喻在各类语篇中的体现及其与语篇正式程度的关系，而从系统功能语言学视角探讨法律语篇中的名物化隐喻的研究并不多。本文拟从韩礼德的语法隐喻理论视角出发，对名物化在各类语篇中的分类及其功能：概念功能、人际功能和语篇功能进行研究。在概念功能方面，名物化可以减少语篇的主观性；在人际功能方面，名物化可以增加语篇的可信性；在语篇功能方面，名物化可以使法律语篇更加准确、客观。在此基础上，，本文试探讨名物化隐喻在法律语篇中的特点和作用，翻译英汉法律语篇中的名物化隐喻所遇到的问题，以及将名物化隐喻应用于法律语篇中存在的问题，以期更好地理解和从总体上把握名物化隐喻现象。
[Abstract]:Nominalization exists in a large number of texts, especially in written texts, and plays a variety of functions. Nominalization is also widely used in legal discourse. Legal discourse usually refers to the written language of the legal profession, such as laws, regulations, agreements, judgments, etc. The research on nominalization metaphor at home and abroad mainly focuses on the embodiment of nominalization metaphor in all kinds of discourse and its relationship with the formal degree of discourse, but there are few researches on nominalization metaphor in legal discourse from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. From the perspective of Halliday's grammatical metaphor theory, this paper attempts to study the classification and functions of nominalization in various discourses: conceptual function, interpersonal function and textual function. In the aspect of conceptual function nominalization can reduce the subjectivity of discourse; in interpersonal function nominalization can increase the credibility of discourse; in the aspect of textual function nominalization can make legal discourse more accurate and objective. On this basis, this paper attempts to explore the characteristics and functions of nominalization metaphor in legal discourse, the problems encountered in translating nominalization metaphor in legal discourse, and the problems in applying nominalization metaphor to legal discourse. In order to better understand and grasp the nominalization metaphorical phenomenon.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H315;H15
本文编号：2168875
[Abstract]:Nominalization exists in a large number of texts, especially in written texts, and plays a variety of functions. Nominalization is also widely used in legal discourse. Legal discourse usually refers to the written language of the legal profession, such as laws, regulations, agreements, judgments, etc. The research on nominalization metaphor at home and abroad mainly focuses on the embodiment of nominalization metaphor in all kinds of discourse and its relationship with the formal degree of discourse, but there are few researches on nominalization metaphor in legal discourse from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. From the perspective of Halliday's grammatical metaphor theory, this paper attempts to study the classification and functions of nominalization in various discourses: conceptual function, interpersonal function and textual function. In the aspect of conceptual function nominalization can reduce the subjectivity of discourse; in interpersonal function nominalization can increase the credibility of discourse; in the aspect of textual function nominalization can make legal discourse more accurate and objective. On this basis, this paper attempts to explore the characteristics and functions of nominalization metaphor in legal discourse, the problems encountered in translating nominalization metaphor in legal discourse, and the problems in applying nominalization metaphor to legal discourse. In order to better understand and grasp the nominalization metaphorical phenomenon.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H315;H15
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王晋军;名词化在语篇类型中的体现[J];外语学刊;2003年02期
2 肖云枢;法律英语语法特点初探[J];外语教学;2000年04期
3 杨丰宁;名词化现象及其原因[J];外语教学;1996年03期
4 王菊泉,宗福常;英汉被动意义名词性短语的对比研究[J];外语教学与研究;1988年04期
5 胡壮麟;语法隐喻[J];外语教学与研究;1996年04期
6 胡壮麟!100871;评语法隐喻的韩礼德模式[J];外语教学与研究;2000年02期
7 朱永生!200433,严世清!215006;语法隐喻理论的理据和贡献[J];外语教学与研究;2000年02期
8 杨敏;法律语篇权力意志剖析[J];外语与外语教学;2004年05期
9 朱永生;英语中的语法比喻现象[J];外国语(上海外国语学院学报);1994年01期
本文编号：2168875
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2168875.html
