《艺术人生》与《咏乐汇》会话分析比较
发布时间：2018-08-07 22:01
【摘要】：自2000年开始,著名的主持人朱军主持的《艺术人生》在中央电视台播出,这一档温情的谈话类节目开播至今,为观众展示了不同艺术家的艺术历程,也为其他电视谈话类节目的制作提供了新的视角。《咏乐会》于2008年首次在央视播出,由李咏主持,秉承“每个人都是自己的英雄,每个人都有自己的传奇”这一节目宗旨,在推出的短短几年中,以其独特的形式和视角,让人耳目一新。 本文通过会话分析的方法,对《艺术人生》和《咏乐会》两个谈话节目进行了对比研究,试图找出两个节目不同风格形成的原因,也试图探寻出两位名嘴所主持的谈话类节目的语言运用规律及结构模式。 首先通过对两个节目整体结构的比较,找出节目在开端、主体及结尾方面的不同点。两个节目的基调在节目开始时就奠定了,开场方式各有不同,主体部分的比较在下文中进行了详细的阐释,结尾处《咏乐会》较《艺术人生》更加随意。 其次对两个节目的局部细节结构进行了比较。在话题的选择、发起方式及语篇的连贯方式上有所不同,《艺术人生》侧重对话题的深度挖掘,主持人牢牢地控制住了话题,话题衔接紧密,而《咏乐会》话题选择相对比较自由,主持人和嘉宾都可以发起话题,话题的衔接采用了多种方式；同时在话轮及话轮的转换上也存在明显差异,《艺术人生》话轮较长,采用毗邻双部式的对答结构,话轮转换方式比较单一,《咏乐会》话轮较短,采用毗邻多部式的对答结构,话轮转换方式灵活多样,两个节目的话语打断的原因也有所不同。这是文章的主体部分,通过对语料的分析,我们可以看出两个节目不同风格的形成原因。 再次对两位主持人朱军和李咏的主持风格进行了对比,分别从形象、语言、体态语三个方面进行了分析,可以看出主持人的风格对节目风格的影响。 最后通过以上对语料的详细分析,试图从节目定位、话题选择、主持人角色定位和语境手段的利用上找出《艺术人生》辉煌至今和《咏乐会》开播两年多却草草收场的原因。
[Abstract]:Since 2000, "art life", presided by the famous host Zhu Jun, has been broadcast on CCTV. This kind of warm talk shows the art history of different artists and provides a new perspective for the production of other TV talk shows. The purpose of the program is to chant "everyone is his own hero, everyone has his own legend". In the short years that has been introduced, it is refreshing with its unique form and perspective.
Through the method of conversational analysis, this paper makes a comparative study of the two talk shows of "art life" and "chanting music", trying to find out the reasons for the formation of the different styles of the two programs, and trying to find out the rules of language use and the structure model of the two talk shows.
First of all, through the comparison of the overall structure of the two programs, find out the different points of the program in the beginning, the subject and the end. The keynote of the two programs is laid out at the beginning of the program, the way of opening is different, the comparison of the main part is explained in detail in the following, and the end of the song is more casual than the art life.
Secondly, the local detail structure of the two programs is compared. The choice of the topic, the mode of initiation and the coherence of the text are different. < art life > focuses on the depth of the topic; the host firmly controls the topic, the topic is closely connected, and the theme selection is relatively free, the host and the guest are all available. At the same time, there are many different ways to connect the topic and the topic. At the same time, there are obvious differences between the turn of the talk and the turn of the talk. The reasons for the interruption of the two programs are also different. This is the main part of the article. Through the analysis of the corpus, we can see the reasons for the formation of the different styles of the two programs.
Again, the style of the two hosts, Zhu Jun and Li Yong, was compared and analyzed from three aspects of image, language and body language, and the influence of the style of the host on the style of the program could be seen.
Finally, through the detailed analysis of the language materials, this paper tries to find out the reasons of "art life", "art life" and "singing music club" for more than two years, from the program positioning, topic selection, the position of the host role and the use of contextual means.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13
本文编号：2171477
[Abstract]:Since 2000, "art life", presided by the famous host Zhu Jun, has been broadcast on CCTV. This kind of warm talk shows the art history of different artists and provides a new perspective for the production of other TV talk shows. The purpose of the program is to chant "everyone is his own hero, everyone has his own legend". In the short years that has been introduced, it is refreshing with its unique form and perspective.
Through the method of conversational analysis, this paper makes a comparative study of the two talk shows of "art life" and "chanting music", trying to find out the reasons for the formation of the different styles of the two programs, and trying to find out the rules of language use and the structure model of the two talk shows.
First of all, through the comparison of the overall structure of the two programs, find out the different points of the program in the beginning, the subject and the end. The keynote of the two programs is laid out at the beginning of the program, the way of opening is different, the comparison of the main part is explained in detail in the following, and the end of the song is more casual than the art life.
Secondly, the local detail structure of the two programs is compared. The choice of the topic, the mode of initiation and the coherence of the text are different. < art life > focuses on the depth of the topic; the host firmly controls the topic, the topic is closely connected, and the theme selection is relatively free, the host and the guest are all available. At the same time, there are many different ways to connect the topic and the topic. At the same time, there are obvious differences between the turn of the talk and the turn of the talk. The reasons for the interruption of the two programs are also different. This is the main part of the article. Through the analysis of the corpus, we can see the reasons for the formation of the different styles of the two programs.
Again, the style of the two hosts, Zhu Jun and Li Yong, was compared and analyzed from three aspects of image, language and body language, and the influence of the style of the host on the style of the program could be seen.
Finally, through the detailed analysis of the language materials, this paper tries to find out the reasons of "art life", "art life" and "singing music club" for more than two years, from the program positioning, topic selection, the position of the host role and the use of contextual means.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨思明;两岸电视情感类访谈节目会话分析比较研究[D];暨南大学;2013年
，本文编号：2171477
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2171477.html
