央视《百家讲坛》的动态多符号语篇分析
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of computer science and multimedia technology, non-verbal symbols such as color, music, gestures and images play an increasingly important role in daily communication and information dissemination. Therefore, the traditional discourse analysis, which takes language as the only object of study, must be transformed into discourse analysis which contains a variety of symbolic systems. In this case, multimodal discourse analysis based on systemic functional linguistics emerged as the times require and quickly became the focus of research. Up to now, many scholars have done in-depth research on multimodal discourse analysis, but most of them focus on single types of symbols, such as language and image, and most of them are confined to two-dimensional planar text or static text. There are few comprehensive studies on the construction of multiple meanings in three-dimensional dynamic discourse. As a TV lecture column of CCTV, the Lecture Forum is deeply loved by the audience and has aroused widespread social concern. Because of its rich symbol resources, the interpretation of its meaning requires the audience to have a certain multi-modal reading ability. The previous studies on the Lecture were mainly from the angle of communication, and did not involve the field of linguistics. In view of this, this paper tries to use multi-modal discourse theory and register theory to deeply explain how the various symbolic resources, such as visual symbols and text symbols, interact with each other to form meaning. In order to achieve the best results of the lecture column. This study reconstructs Janette Joan's two-stage multi-modal discourse analysis framework. The first stage is quantitative analysis, which is called multimodal component analysis, which aims to explore the distribution characteristics of typical symbols in the discourse, and the second stage is an explanatory qualitative analysis. That is, to explain the causes of the choice and distribution of various symbols in the text, and to summarize the implications for teaching and other fields. The empirical analysis shows that the program uses a variety of symbol resources, among which embedded video and subtitles at the bottom of the screen are the most commonly used. Correspondingly, video technology is the most frequently used technology to make visual symbols. However, the distribution of these symbol resources in the outline structure is very different. Specifically, the beginning (trailers 1 and the beginning) and the end (trailers 3) represent the majority of the symbolic resources for interpersonal meaning, while the middle part is mainly used to express empirical meaning. In addition, visual symbols, rather than text boxes, occupy the main space of the screen. The column's frequency-screen designers tend to use normal-sized non-serif fonts to express text boxes. All of these contribute to the construction of comprehensive meaning. The research results of this paper have the following practical significance: first, as an important way of education, there are many similarities between the "hundred forums" and classroom teaching. This research can help teachers to coordinate the choice and distribution of various symbols scientifically and reasonably in classroom teaching design so as to achieve the best classroom teaching effect. Secondly, through the multimodal discourse analysis of some successful episodes in "100 Lecture", this paper explains the reason why this column is so popular from the perspective of linguistics, which will have some positive implications for TV programming. Thirdly, this paper discusses the internal mechanism of choosing and distributing symbol resources with different meanings, which will play a positive role in improving the multi-modal reading ability of students and TV viewers to decode all kinds of symbol resources. In practical language communication activities such as campaign speeches, advertisements and commodity marketing, this dynamic discourse communication model has certain practical significance for language learners and users how to use multiple language symbols for successful communication.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H152
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈瑜敏;;奥运电视公益广告多模态评价意义的构建[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
2 何山燕;;国内多模态话语分析研究述评[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2011年03期
3 李妙晴;;改编电影的多模态话语分析——以《大红灯笼高高挂》为例[J];电影文学;2007年15期
4 程春松;;电影海报的多模态话语解读[J];电影文学;2008年15期
5 胡丹;;多模式话语的社会符号学分析——则香水广告赏析[J];华东交通大学学报;2007年03期
6 励松青;社会符号学与广告话语分析[J];安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
7 李妙晴;;中国同学录电子语篇的特点[J];科教文汇(中旬刊);2008年02期
8 陈瑜敏;王红阳;;多模态语篇图像的概念意义与图文关系——当代教科书的多模态语篇分析[J];宁波大学学报(教育科学版);2008年01期
9 李战子;多模式话语的社会符号学分析[J];外语研究;2003年05期
10 安建;;基于西南大学校园网主页的视觉语法的多模态分析[J];教育教学论坛;2010年12期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 郭恩华;篮球赛事网络英语新闻报道的多模态话语分析[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
2 李清清;教科书语篇的多模态话语分析[D];厦门大学;2009年
3 汪永勤;单模态和多模态英语传记的比较研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
4 白美娴;教育博客中意义构建的多模态话语分析[D];西南大学;2010年
5 裴晓娜;多模态奥巴马竞选海报语篇的社会符号学分析[D];曲阜师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2172838
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2172838.html