汉语否定式能性表达结构研究
[Abstract]:In modern Chinese, there are many negative ways, both synonymous substitutability and their own unique features. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes an analysis of the semantic, syntactic and pragmatic aspects of the three structures of Chinese negative expression structure: "No V", "V not C", "V not" and "V can't do it" based on the relevant theories of linguistics. In order to find more theoretical and practical value, this paper sums up and compares the similarities and differences among the three in the practical use of language. The full text is divided into four parts, the main contents are as follows: the first part: introduction. This paper mainly describes the purpose and significance of this paper, summarizes the current research situation, limits the scope of this study, and introduces the research methods and the source of the corpus. The second part: semantic analysis of Chinese negative expression structure. In this chapter, from the point of view of the construction of structure meaning and the semantic and structural semantic focus of C, the semantic analysis of "not V", "V not C" and "V can not be" is carried out. Part three: syntactic and functional analysis of Chinese negative expression structure. This chapter mainly discusses the syntactic elements and the co-occurrence elements which can be used in sentences by "can't V", "V not C", "V can not be". Part four: pragmatic analysis of Chinese negative expressive structure and teaching Chinese as a foreign language. On the basis of semantic and syntactic functional analysis, this chapter makes a comprehensive comparison of the three structures of "No V", "V not C" and "V not less" from the perspective of pragmatics, and analyzes their different usage conditions and substitutability. To provide practical value in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Finally is the conclusion, summarizes the main point of view of this article.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏文丽;;从历时角度看“V+得个+W”句式的使用[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2010年03期
2 林可;析“V得/不动”与“V得/不了”[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期
3 彭湃,彭爽;与“V得起”和“V不起”相关的问题[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年01期
4 张先亮;孙岚;;留学生习得能否式“V得/不C”的偏误分析及教学策略[J];汉语学习;2010年05期
5 刘培玉;刘人宁;;复动“V得”句的构造及相关问题[J];汉语学习;2011年03期
6 胡清国;“V得/不C”的强势与理据[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期
7 陈虎;汉语“得”字补语结构新探[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2001年02期
8 力量;“V得(个)R”、“V他(个)R”结构的深层比较[J];江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版);1995年02期
9 邱晓玫;;汉语补语可能式“v不c”结构日语翻译的探讨[J];科教文汇(中旬刊);2011年09期
10 李剑影;;以“V得/不C”为特点的汉语能性结构研究[J];科技信息(科学教研);2007年18期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 朴元基;《水浒传》述补结构研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙利萍;可能补语在北方官话里的不对称考察[D];河南大学;2003年
2 秦慧云;论"V得/不C"结构与对外汉语教学[D];北京师范大学;2005年
3 于准;汉语“可能”的表达方式研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
4 李淑婷;现代汉语中与“得/de/”有关的结构[D];南昌大学;2006年
5 赵福龙;能性述补结构“V不了”研究[D];延边大学;2007年
6 易丹;元代述补结构研究[D];华中科技大学;2006年
7 李美玲;动结式和可能式不对称现象研究[D];首都师范大学;2008年
8 张钊;汉语儿童述补结构的习得研究[D];首都师范大学;2008年
9 顾斐;早期儿童能性补语习得个案研究[D];首都师范大学;2008年
10 董玲玲;“V不得”的词汇化及其例证[D];上海师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2182654
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2182654.html