从语境角度分析中国庭审会话的权力建构

发布时间：2018-10-31 12:08

【摘要】：庭审话语体现了法庭审判中各参与者之间由于话语资源的不均衡而产生的权力不对称。同时，，权力不对称的关系又影响着庭审话语的内容和方式。目前国内研究庭审话语与权力关系的学者侧重于运用话语分析研究庭审话语，而从语境角度研究庭审话语与权力之间关系的资料不多。因此，本文作者结合语境理论，着重从语言学的角度研究研究庭审参与者的作用、地位以及其权力实现的手段。本文运用语境理论，对当前的庭审话语权力在语境层面上进行分析，试图揭示中国法庭审判中话语与权力的关系。通过现场法庭审判的录音转写材料进行分析，以实现以下目标： 1揭示庭审中各个参与者的地位。 2揭示庭审话语中权力控制的表现形式。 3探讨庭审中各话语方实现权力控制或权力抵制的手段。本文作者尝试运用语境理论，从情景语境、上下文语境和文化语境三个维度分析研究庭审话语。在情景语境下，分析法庭的场景、庭审话题以及各个参与者所扮演的角色，发现在法庭这个场景下，权力以固定的形式分配于各个参与者。在上下文语境下，主要研究庭审主要参与者如法官、公诉人、律师和原被告的话语手段。庭审审判过程事实上是一种庭审参与者之间的权力较量过程。法官是最有权势的主体，可以进行指示、问话、裁决、甚至打断等话语行为。公诉人和律师的权力则次之，而原被告则是处于被主导的地位，只能就他人的问话提供具体确切的答话。。在文化语境下，主要分析不同的法律体制、不同的法律文化、不同的法院建筑和庭审中参与者不同的背景，在庭审话语和权力分配中起到怎样的影响。综上所述，作者主要是运用语境理论对中国庭审话语进行研究。本文创新点在于运用语境理论对庭审话语进行分析。
[Abstract]:The trial discourse reflects the asymmetry of power between the participants in the trial due to the imbalance of discourse resources. At the same time, the asymmetry of power affects the content and mode of court discourse. At present, domestic scholars who study the relationship between trial discourse and power focus on the use of discourse analysis to study court discourse, but there are few materials to study the relationship between court discourse and power from the perspective of context. Therefore, combining with context theory, the author focuses on the role and status of trial participants and the means to realize their power from the perspective of linguistics. Based on the theory of context, this paper analyzes the relationship between discourse and power in court trial in China. Through the analysis of the recorded transcripts of the on-site court trial, the following objectives are achieved: 1 revealing the status of each participant in the trial. (2) to reveal the manifestation of power control in court discourse. Third, to explore the means of power control or power resistance. The author tries to use the theory of context to analyze the trial discourse from three dimensions: situational context, contextual context and cultural context. In the context of the situation, this paper analyzes the court scene, the trial topic and the roles played by each participant, and finds that in the court context, power is assigned to each participant in a fixed form. In the context of the context, the main participants in the trial such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers and the original defendant discourse. In fact, the trial process is a process of power contest between the participants in the trial. The judge is the most powerful subject, who can direct, question, adjudicate, and even interrupt. The power of the prosecutor and the lawyer is second, and the original defendant is in the dominant position, can only provide specific and precise answers to the questions of others. In the context of culture, it mainly analyzes different legal systems, different legal cultures, different court buildings and different backgrounds of participants in court hearings. To sum up, the author mainly uses context theory to study Chinese trial discourse. The innovation of this paper is to use context theory to analyze the trial discourse.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】