林夕歌词的偏离搭配研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, more and more people begin to pay attention to the lyric language research. In order to enrich the corpus and the research angle of the lyric language research, explore the lyric language style and style characteristic, this article takes the lyrics of Lin Xi as the research corpus. Based on the deviation theory expounded by Wang Xinjie and the theoretical framework in Zhou Chunlin's book study on the deviation and collocation of semantic Grammar of words, this paper sums up and analyzes the phenomenon of deviation and collocation in the lyrics of Lin Xi. This paper is divided into four chapters, the first chapter briefly introduces the theory of deviation. The second and third chapters classify Lin Xi's original color lyrics and poetic lyrics' language deviation collocation (including semantic deviation collocation and grammatical deviation collocation) respectively. The fourth chapter compares the deviation and collocation of Lin Xi's lyrics with those of He Jingzhi and Mu Dan's masterpieces of poetry, and finds out the similarities and differences in deviating collocation between the lyric language which is inclined to the spoken language and the poetry language which is inclined to the written language. In this paper, a large number of deviations and collocations are found from the lyrics of Lin Xi. Semantic deviation includes subpredicate, object, definite, joint, comparative and complement phrases deviating from collocation type, among which, the phenomenon of subject-predicate phrase deviation is the most. Compared with the deviation phenomenon summarized in Zhou Chunlin's A study of semantic Grammar deviation and collocation of words in Zhou Chunlin's book, there is a semantic deviation and collocation phenomenon in Lin Xi's lyrics at the sentence level of "Ba" word structure. The semantic deviation between the original lyrics and the poetic lyrics is basically consistent, however, the semantic deviation of the original lyrics is mainly focused on the phrase level, and the poetic lyrics often have the sentence level deviations. In terms of the proportion of deviation from collocation, the proportion of original lyrics in the whole lyric is far less than that of poetic lyric. In terms of deviation, poetic lyrics are often larger than the semantic span of the original lyrics. In terms of grammatical deviation and collocation, the phenomenon of grammatical deviation and collocation in Lin Xi's lyrics is not much, but it is concentrated on the phenomenon of word usage, which is related to the characteristics of temporary auditory decoding of lyrics, and complicated grammatical deviations can easily lead to difficulties in understanding. It does not accord with the essential characteristics of the lyrics. Comparing the semantic deviation between Lin Xi's lyrics and He Jingzhi's and Mu Dan's poems, we find that the type of semantic deviation between Lin Xi's lyrics and poems' semantic deviation is basically the same. The difference is that poetry prefers symbolism, metonymy, etc. Compared with poetry, the proportion of semantic deviation and the span of semantic deviation are not as good as poetry. Compared with the semantic deviation and collocation in He Jingzhi's poetry, there is no obvious difference in quantity, proportion and span of deviation between poetic lyrics and He Jingzhi's poems, and the deviation of lyrics is sometimes greater than that of He Jingzhi's poetry. Comparing the poetic lyrics with Mu Dan's poems, the proportion and span of the deviations from the poems of Mu Dan are much larger than those of the lyrics. Due to the limitation of time, ability and corpus resources, we can only use MI value and T value to calculate the semantic span, and we can not give accurate data to explain the difference between the semantic span of poetry and lyrics. From the comparison of semantic deviation and collocation, we can see that popular lyrics, as a form of language among the common people, need to be easily understood, while poetry, as a form of language in elegant literature, can be popular or profound. The overall style of the lyrics of Lin Xi is in line with the essential feature of the lyric creation which is easy to understand. Compared with poetry, the two are different in the same, larger than the same, and they do not belong to the same style.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:H146
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王聿发;;聊斋俚曲中歇后语的分布与类型[J];蒲松龄研究;2006年04期
2 刘远志,马翔宇;试论辞格的施事功能[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2002年02期
3 鞠红;论低调陈述的特征和社会心理基础[J];安徽大学学报;2005年01期
4 鞠红;;论低调陈述的语言特点及其语用功能[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期
5 刘旺余;;委婉语跨文化研究[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2006年04期
6 潘瑞春;;浅论缩略语结构与修辞功能[J];安徽职业技术学院学报;2007年01期
7 亢娟妮;;动态顺应下的中西方面子观研究[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
8 徐琳;;释“飙X”[J];安徽文学(下半月);2007年09期
9 马海江;刘姣;;从“郎才女貌”到“郎财女貌”的转化[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年05期
10 赵涛;;从修辞学角度看《麦田里的守望者》里的语言特点[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年07期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 叶李滨;;从体育专业词汇的普通化趋势看文化对语言的影响(英文)[A];福建省外国语文学会2008年年会论文集[C];2008年
2 黎运汉;;四十年来语言风格定义研究述评[A];文学语言理论与实践丛书——辞章学论文集(上)[C];2002年
3 李名方;;心理认同是检验修辞效果的惟一标准[A];文学语言理论与实践丛书——辞章学论文集(下)[C];2002年
4 余京辉;;港式中文对普通话水平测试的影响及培训策略[A];第三届全国普通话水平测试学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
5 郑荣馨;;大力倡导修辞学研究的辩证法——兼论中国修辞学研究的现状和发展[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
6 郑荣馨;;论王希杰修辞学研究的科学精神[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
7 赵贤德;;学走王希杰先生做学问之路[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
8 陈帅;;浅谈王希杰修辞理论逻辑结构[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
9 孟建安;;三一语言学派及其形成的基本条件[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
10 胡世雄;;三一理论与国外修辞学——试谈三一理论的创新意义[A];走向科学大道的修辞学[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 原雪;二语/外语语境下的批判性阅读理论构建研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
2 卢玉卿;文学作品中言外之意的翻译研究[D];南开大学;2010年
3 王艳红;美国黑人英语汉译研究[D];南开大学;2010年
4 刘中黎;中国百年日札写作教育与教学研究[D];福建师范大学;2010年
5 侯桂运;文言小说诗化特征研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
6 姜燕;汉语口语美学研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
7 方清明;现代汉语名名复合形式的认知语义研究[D];暨南大学;2011年
8 阮氏黎心;汉越人体名词隐喻对比研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
9 王俊;现代汉语离合词研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
10 张金圈;汉语单音方位词与单音动词的偏正性组配研究[D];华中师范大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 黄姗姗;系统功能理论视阈下的“X是X”结构研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
2 赵桂阳;现代汉语“不是X的X”结构考察[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
3 周崴嵬;《围城》中人物描写的辞格运用研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2010年
4 王斌;论品牌名称命名翻译[D];广西师范学院;2010年
5 李玲;婚联隐喻的语篇功能研究[D];长沙理工大学;2010年
6 陈芳;《越策越开心》语言艺术研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年
7 赵文曙;长株潭地区民歌歌词修辞与语言风格研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年
8 彭峥;《曾国藩全集·书信》谦敬婉词研究与《谦词敬词婉词词典》修订[D];湘潭大学;2010年
9 梁菊;马斯洛需要层次理论下的委婉语动机研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年
10 唐薇薇;汉语连词的非连词用法研究[D];广西民族大学;2010年
本文编号:2364208
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2364208.html