责备类羡余否定的多角度分析

发布时间：2018-12-09 08:22

【摘要】：责备类羡余否定是一种边缘性的非典型羡余否定,长久以来得不到语言学家的重视。本文以这一类羡余否定为研究对象,从句法、语义、语用和认知四个层面进行分析研究。我们归纳总结了责备类羡余否定的句法特征和语义特点,分析了责备类羡余否定的语用效果,并从认知角度对其成因进行了解释。本文的研究内容主要包括以下五个部分：第一章,绪论。这一部分我们主要介绍了本文的研究对象、研究意义、研究方法和研究内容,羡余否定的研究现状以及语料来源。第二章,简要介绍羡余及羡余否定。为了使读者大致了解本文的研究对象,我们在这一章明确界定了羡余及羡余否定的定义,并对这两者进行了细致的分类。第三章,责备类羡余否定的句法语义分析。这一章我们对责备类羡余否定的每一个组成部分都进行了分析,总结它们在句法和语义上的特点。其中V都含有一定的否定意味,“不该”与之共现,就成为一个羡余成分。后接成分X一般由肯定形式的复杂短语或句子组成,表示过去发生的不如意的事件行为。X具有主观消极性和可控性的特征。第四章,责备类羡余否定的语用认知分析。责备类羡余否定违背了适量原则,但是它明确表达了说话人对事件的否定态度和消极评价,能够增强句子的语气,取得更好的表达效果。此外,羡余否定还是体现语言主观性的一种结构形式,是主观化的一种结果。本文从说话人的视角、情感和认识三个角度分析了责备类羡余否定的主观性。我们认为责备类羡余否定是由于隐涵义的追加造成的。第五章,结论。这一章我们总结了本文的主要内容和存在的不足之处。
[Abstract]:Reproachful envy negation is a marginal atypical surplus negation, which has not been attached importance to by linguists for a long time. This paper takes this kind of envious negation as the research object and analyzes it from four aspects: syntax, semantics, pragmatics and cognition. We generalize and summarize the syntactic and semantic features of blame envy negation, analyze the pragmatic effects of blame envy negation, and explain its causes from a cognitive perspective. The research content of this paper mainly includes the following five parts: chapter one, introduction. In this part, we mainly introduce the research object, research significance, research methods and contents, the research status quo and the source of corpus. The second chapter briefly introduces envious surplus and envy surplus negation. In order to give readers a general understanding of the research object of this paper, we clearly define the definitions of envy surplus and envy surplus negation in this chapter, and make a detailed classification of them. The third chapter is the syntactic and semantic analysis of reproachful surplus negation. In this chapter, we analyze each component of blame envy negation and summarize their syntactic and semantic characteristics. Among them V all contain certain negation meaning, "should not" appear with it, become an envious element. X is usually composed of complex phrases or sentences in positive form, indicating the dissatisfactory behavior of events in the past. X has the characteristics of subjective negativity and controllability. Chapter four, the pragmatic cognitive analysis of reproachful surplus negation. Reproachful negation violates the principle of moderation, but it clearly expresses the speaker's negative attitude to events and negative evaluation, which can enhance the mood of the sentence and achieve a better expression effect. In addition, envious negation is also a structural form of language subjectivity and a result of subjectivization. This paper analyzes the subjectivity of reproachful envy and negation from the perspective of the speaker, emotion and cognition. We believe that blame type envy negation is caused by the addition of implicit meaning. Chapter V, conclusion. In this chapter, we summarize the main contents and shortcomings of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H04;H030

【参考文献】