“我有一个问题”：一项对在中国语境下提问者在学术会议、讲座提问回答环节语言运用的研究
发布时间：2019-01-02 18:33
【摘要】：作为学术讲座、学术会议一部分的提问回答环节目前还未得到语言学研究者的足够重视。尤其在中国，很少有研究者对该体裁进行专门的研究。而该体裁对几乎每位学者都有重要的意义，因为他们学术领域的成长离不开参加学术讲座、学术会议。与讲座、发表环节相比，提问回答环节有其特点：更具有互动性，参与者可以进行面对面的探讨、争论；更具即时性，问答双方事先准备的成分较少，而临场发挥的程度多。 本文研究的是提问者在提问回答环节中的语言。Pauline Webber（1997）对提问者的问题进行过分类，本文采用她的分类标准，将通过参与观察收集到的语料进行分类后，重点研究提问者提问的最多一类的信息引导型问题。本文从宏观以及微观两个方面进行研究，旨在探索提问者所提问题的体裁结构以及他们在具体语言使用中对于介入资源的策略性选择。 宏观结构分析结果表明，在GDUFS语料中提问者以一种由八个元素组成的“三明治”风格进行提问。第一层包括对发表者的感谢、称呼、恭维；第二层包括表明意图、提供语境、提问、再次提问；第三层由提前感谢组成。第一、第三层为面子工作层，是可选的；而第二层则是真正的目的层，是必须的。通过与Querol-Julián (2011)对于同一领域同一类型问题的研究进行对比，本文发现文化因素似乎的确是体裁结构不同的一个影响因素。Querol-Julián (2011)的语料中提问者的问题只包含一层，即真正的目的层；而在这层中，提问者没有提供语境，而是直接表明意图、然后提问。基于对比，我们可以推断：西方学者喜欢直接的方式，，而中国学者更倾向于循环的方式；面子工作在中国文化中比在西方文化中更重要。 微观介入资源的分析表明，每种介入资源的分布是不同的。在GDUFS语料中ENTERTAIN是最受欢迎的，而CONCUR和DISTANCE没有被使用过。虽然每种介入资源分布不同，他们都帮助为问答双方构建了对话空间，在打开或者关闭对话空间的过程中，相应的人际功能得到了实现。在“三明治”结构中，提问者倾向于在第二层即真正的目的层使用介入资源。 本文从宏观和微观两个层面对作为学术讲座、学术会议一部分的提问回答环节中提问者的语言进行了研究。鉴于目前国内研究尚少，本研究具有一定的开拓性;同时本研究的发现对于新学者的社会化过程以及提高他们的学术素养(LeaStreet2000)也具有一定的指导意义。
[Abstract]:As an academic lecture, the questions and answers of the academic conference have not been paid enough attention by linguistics researchers. Especially in China, few researchers have made a special study on this genre. This genre is of great significance to almost every scholar, because their growth in the academic field depends on attending academic lectures and conferences. Compared with lectures and lectures, questions and answers have their own characteristics: more interactive, participants can face to face discussion, argument, more immediate, the two sides of the question and answer prepared in advance less, but the degree of play on the spot more. In this paper, the questioner's language. Pauline Webber (1997 has been used to classify the questioner's questions. This paper adopts her classification standard and classifies the collected language by participating in the observation. Focus on the most types of information-oriented questions asked by questioners. The purpose of this study is to explore the genres of the questions put forward by the questioners and their strategic choices in the use of specific languages. The results of macro-structural analysis show that the questioner in the GDUFS corpus asks questions in a "sandwich" style composed of eight elements. The first layer consists of gratitude, address, compliment to the publisher; the second layer consists of expressing intention, providing context, asking questions, and asking questions again; the third layer is composed of early thanks. First, the third layer is the face working layer, optional; the second layer is the true goal layer, is necessary. By comparing it with Querol-Juli 谩 n (2011) on the same type of problem in the same field, It is found that the cultural factor does seem to be an influential factor in different genres. In the corpus of Querol-Juli 谩 n (2011), the questioner's question contains only one layer, that is, the real target level; In this layer, the questioner does not provide the context, but expresses the intention directly and then asks the question. Based on comparison, we can infer that Western scholars prefer direct ways, while Chinese scholars prefer circular ones, and face work is more important in Chinese culture than in western culture. The analysis of microcosmic intervention resources shows that the distribution of each intervention resource is different. ENTERTAIN is the most popular in the GDUFS corpus, while CONCUR and DISTANCE are not used. Although each intervention resource is distributed differently, they help build a dialogue space for both sides of the question and answer, and the corresponding interpersonal functions are realized during the process of opening or closing the dialogue space. In the sandwich structure, questioners tend to use interventional resources at the second level, the true destination level. In this paper, the language of the questioner is studied from the macro and micro aspects of answering questions as part of academic lectures and conferences. In view of the lack of domestic research at present, this study has some pioneering significance, and the findings of this study also have certain guiding significance for the socialization process of new scholars and the improvement of their academic literacy (LeaStreet2000).
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H05
本文编号：2398835
[Abstract]:As an academic lecture, the questions and answers of the academic conference have not been paid enough attention by linguistics researchers. Especially in China, few researchers have made a special study on this genre. This genre is of great significance to almost every scholar, because their growth in the academic field depends on attending academic lectures and conferences. Compared with lectures and lectures, questions and answers have their own characteristics: more interactive, participants can face to face discussion, argument, more immediate, the two sides of the question and answer prepared in advance less, but the degree of play on the spot more. In this paper, the questioner's language. Pauline Webber (1997 has been used to classify the questioner's questions. This paper adopts her classification standard and classifies the collected language by participating in the observation. Focus on the most types of information-oriented questions asked by questioners. The purpose of this study is to explore the genres of the questions put forward by the questioners and their strategic choices in the use of specific languages. The results of macro-structural analysis show that the questioner in the GDUFS corpus asks questions in a "sandwich" style composed of eight elements. The first layer consists of gratitude, address, compliment to the publisher; the second layer consists of expressing intention, providing context, asking questions, and asking questions again; the third layer is composed of early thanks. First, the third layer is the face working layer, optional; the second layer is the true goal layer, is necessary. By comparing it with Querol-Juli 谩 n (2011) on the same type of problem in the same field, It is found that the cultural factor does seem to be an influential factor in different genres. In the corpus of Querol-Juli 谩 n (2011), the questioner's question contains only one layer, that is, the real target level; In this layer, the questioner does not provide the context, but expresses the intention directly and then asks the question. Based on comparison, we can infer that Western scholars prefer direct ways, while Chinese scholars prefer circular ones, and face work is more important in Chinese culture than in western culture. The analysis of microcosmic intervention resources shows that the distribution of each intervention resource is different. ENTERTAIN is the most popular in the GDUFS corpus, while CONCUR and DISTANCE are not used. Although each intervention resource is distributed differently, they help build a dialogue space for both sides of the question and answer, and the corresponding interpersonal functions are realized during the process of opening or closing the dialogue space. In the sandwich structure, questioners tend to use interventional resources at the second level, the true destination level. In this paper, the language of the questioner is studied from the macro and micro aspects of answering questions as part of academic lectures and conferences. In view of the lack of domestic research at present, this study has some pioneering significance, and the findings of this study also have certain guiding significance for the socialization process of new scholars and the improvement of their academic literacy (LeaStreet2000).
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张斌;;仪式、象征权力与学术秩序——学术会议过程的社会学分析[J];高等教育研究;2012年01期
本文编号：2398835
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2398835.html
