《容斋随笔》与《十驾斋养新录》之训诂学比较研究
发布时间：2019-01-06 15:02
【摘要】：笔记文献是一座史料宝库，其中之宝藏正在被越来越多的人所认识和利用。笔记中不仅保留了若干真实的历史资料，内容还涵盖了政治、经济、社会、文化诸方面，更重要的是，它是汉语史研究的重要语料，理应受到人们，尤其是语言研究者的重视，并作为重要的语料加以开发和利用。然而在这些笔记中宋代洪迈的《容斋随笔》与清代钱大昕的《十架斋养新录》具有十分重要的研究价值。 本文试以《容斋随笔》与《十驾斋养新录》这两部代表宋清两代笔记文献最高成就的作品为研究对象，从训诂学的角度对其进行分析、对比与阐释。 论文分为五章，包括引言和正文四章。引言部分主要论述了选题依据、研究方法、研究状况、创新之处、选题意义这五个方面。 第一章主要论述了“作者与成书”。分为两个小节：第一小节主要论述了洪迈的生平与其《容斋随笔》的创作及版本情况；第二小节论述了钱大昕的生平与其《十驾斋养新录》的创作及版本情况。 第二章主要论述了洪迈《容斋随笔》的训诂学内容。分为两个小节：第一小节主要论述了《容斋随笔》中的对语词的研究状况，分为名物词与俗语词研究两个部分；第二小节主要论述了《容斋随笔》中对典章制度的研究。 第三章主要论述了钱大昕《十驾斋养新录》的训诂学内容，分为三个小节：第一小节主要论述了钱氏在该书中对《说文》的研究，包括《说文》体例的阐发与应用以及说文引经两部分；第二小节主要论述了钱氏对《尔雅》的研究，包括对其作者的考证以及文字的考释两部分；第三小节主要论述了钱氏在该书中记载的其他内容，包括对音韵学的研究，对经学的研究，对方志学与金石学的研究三部分。 第四章主要论述了两书训诂学内容的区别与联系，，包括解释词语、探究音韵、总结避讳义例、记录典章制度四个部分。
[Abstract]:Notebooks are a treasure trove of historical materials, in which treasure is being recognized and used by more and more people. The notes not only retain some real historical materials, but also cover political, economic, social and cultural aspects. More importantly, they are important materials in the study of Chinese history and deserve attention from people, especially language researchers. And as an important corpus to be developed and used. However, in these notes, Hongmai's "Rong Zhai essay" in Song Dynasty and Qian Daxin's "Shi Jia Zhai Yang Xin" in Qing Dynasty have very important research value. This paper tries to analyze, contrast and explain the two works which represent the highest achievements of the two dynasties of Song and Qing dynasties, from the angle of exegetics, with the two works "Rong Zhai essay" and "Ten Jia Zhai raising New Records" as the research objects. The paper is divided into five chapters, including the introduction and the body of four chapters. The introduction mainly discusses the basis, research methods, research status, innovation and significance of the topic. The first chapter mainly discusses the author and the book. It is divided into two sections: the first section mainly discusses the life of Hong Mai and the creation and edition of his essay Rongzhai, and the second section discusses the life of Qian Daxin and the creation and edition of his "Ten Jia Zhai's New Records". The second chapter mainly discusses the exegetics content of Hongmai Rongzhai essay. It is divided into two sections: the first section mainly discusses the research status of the words in the essay of Rong Zhai, which is divided into two parts: the study of the names and objects and the study of the colloquial words; the second section mainly discusses the study of the rules and regulations in the essay of Rong Zhai. The third chapter mainly discusses the exegetics content of Qian Daxin's "Ten Jia Zhai New Records", which is divided into three sections: the first section mainly discusses Qian's research on Shuowen in this book. It includes the analysis and application of the style of Shuo Wen, and the two parts of citing the classics of Shuo Wen. The second section mainly discusses Qian's research on "Erya", including the textual research of the author and the textual research. The third section mainly discusses the other contents recorded by Qian in the book, including the study of phonology, the study of Confucian classics, the study of Fangzhi and the study of petrology. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the differences and relations between the two books' exegetics, including explaining words, probing into phonology, summarizing taboo examples, and recording the rules and regulations.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13
本文编号：2402948
[Abstract]:Notebooks are a treasure trove of historical materials, in which treasure is being recognized and used by more and more people. The notes not only retain some real historical materials, but also cover political, economic, social and cultural aspects. More importantly, they are important materials in the study of Chinese history and deserve attention from people, especially language researchers. And as an important corpus to be developed and used. However, in these notes, Hongmai's "Rong Zhai essay" in Song Dynasty and Qian Daxin's "Shi Jia Zhai Yang Xin" in Qing Dynasty have very important research value. This paper tries to analyze, contrast and explain the two works which represent the highest achievements of the two dynasties of Song and Qing dynasties, from the angle of exegetics, with the two works "Rong Zhai essay" and "Ten Jia Zhai raising New Records" as the research objects. The paper is divided into five chapters, including the introduction and the body of four chapters. The introduction mainly discusses the basis, research methods, research status, innovation and significance of the topic. The first chapter mainly discusses the author and the book. It is divided into two sections: the first section mainly discusses the life of Hong Mai and the creation and edition of his essay Rongzhai, and the second section discusses the life of Qian Daxin and the creation and edition of his "Ten Jia Zhai's New Records". The second chapter mainly discusses the exegetics content of Hongmai Rongzhai essay. It is divided into two sections: the first section mainly discusses the research status of the words in the essay of Rong Zhai, which is divided into two parts: the study of the names and objects and the study of the colloquial words; the second section mainly discusses the study of the rules and regulations in the essay of Rong Zhai. The third chapter mainly discusses the exegetics content of Qian Daxin's "Ten Jia Zhai New Records", which is divided into three sections: the first section mainly discusses Qian's research on Shuowen in this book. It includes the analysis and application of the style of Shuo Wen, and the two parts of citing the classics of Shuo Wen. The second section mainly discusses Qian's research on "Erya", including the textual research of the author and the textual research. The third section mainly discusses the other contents recorded by Qian in the book, including the study of phonology, the study of Confucian classics, the study of Fangzhi and the study of petrology. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the differences and relations between the two books' exegetics, including explaining words, probing into phonology, summarizing taboo examples, and recording the rules and regulations.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 常晓雁;从《容斋随笔》看洪迈的修辞思想[J];池州师专学报;1997年02期
2 李晓菊;洪迈《容斋随笔》所论古代文书问题[J];档案学通讯;2002年01期
3 周斌武;钱大昕与清代音韵学[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1985年04期
4 周建;洪迈《容斋随笔》版本考[J];古籍整理研究学刊;1996年01期
5 力之;《容斋随笔》刊误[J];贵州文史丛刊;1998年05期
6 吕友仁;;钱大昕小学表微[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年01期
7 吕友仁;钱大昕与《说文》两大家[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年03期
8 许明;;《容斋随笔》中的单音节反义词及其使用原因[J];吉林广播电视大学学报;2006年03期
9 熊庆年;钱大昕音转说试析[J];江西教育学院学报(综合版);1989年04期
10 汪受宽;;试论钱大昕的历史考证学[J];兰州大学学报;1991年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘玉屏;从《世说新语》看魏晋南北朝时期汉语语法的流变[D];福建师范大学;2001年
本文编号：2402948
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2402948.html
