韩汉多层状语连用语序对比
发布时间：2019-03-12 16:36
【摘要】：本课题主要从类型学视角,对韩汉两种语言多层状语的连用语序进行梳理和对比分析。全文共分八章。 第一章主要说明,韩汉多层状语连用语序的研究意义、研究现状、相关理论及方法。语序类型研究的深入,为本文能够尽可能充分详尽的描写和分析韩汉多层状语连用的语序提供了理论基础和方法上的指导。 第二章主要对比分析,韩汉状语的句法特征和语义类别。韩汉状语作为谓语的状态元,呈现出自由、不自由、半自由三种情况。根据句法-语义特征和语用特征,首先将韩汉状语分为外围性状语和内在性状语,其次将内在性状语分为补足性状语、限制性状语和描写性状语。根据构成要素,韩汉状语分为题元状语和非题元状语。 第三章主要对比分析韩汉多层外围性状语连用语序的异同。韩汉语外围性状语,在句法位置上居于主语前,在语义上呈现出[+关联]、[+评注]、[+限定]等语义特征,构成要素上分为：题元状语和非题元状语。总体而言,在语义上,韩汉多层外围性状语的连用语序呈现为[+关联][+评注][+限定]；在构成要素上,韩汉多层状语连用语序是非题元状语先于题元状语。韩国语[+关涉格]状语归属于内在性状语,汉语的[+关涉格]状语隶属于外围性状语。 第四章主要对比分析,韩汉多层内在性状语连用语序的异同。韩国语多层内在性状语连用的语序是,限制性状语补足性状语描写性状语；汉语多层内在性状语连用的语序是限制性状语描写性状语补足性状语。 第五章主要对比分析,韩汉语多层题元状语连用语序的异同。韩国语多层题元状语的连用语序是：[+根由格]题元状语[+条件格]题元状语[+时地格]题元状语[+邻体格]题元状语[+客体格]题元状语；汉语多层题元状语的连用语序是：[+根由格]题元状语[+条件格]题元状语[关涉格]题元状语[+时地格]题元状语[+邻体格]题元状语[+客体格]题元状语。韩国语[关涉格]题元状语是内在性状语,汉语[关涉格]题元状语是外围性状语。 第六章主要对比分析韩汉多层副词状语连用语序的异同。韩汉多层副词状语的连用语序是,关联性副词评注性副词限定性副词描摹性副词。韩国语的否定副词状语最靠近谓语,汉语的否定副词则随否定域而移位。 第七章主要描写和分析汉语多层补语连用语序及在韩国语中的对应表现。从而进一步验证汉语的补语同状语一样是降级述谓性成分,是谓语的补足性成分,对应于韩国语的状语或谓语。 第八章是结语,主要说明本课题所作的基本工作、创新之处和不足之处。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of typology, this paper makes a contrastive analysis of the sequence of consecutive adverbial words in Korean and Chinese languages. The full text is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter mainly explains the significance, the present situation, the related theories and methods of the research on the order of multiple adverbial conjunctions in Han and Han dynasties. The in-depth study of word order types provides the theoretical basis and methodological guidance for this paper to describe and analyze the word order of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial conjunction in as much detail as possible. Chapter two is a contrastive analysis of the syntactic features and semantic categories of Han-Han adverbial. Han-Han adverbial, as a state element of predicate, presents three kinds of conditions: freedom, non-freedom and semi-freedom. According to the syntactic-semantic and pragmatic features, the Han-Han adverbial is firstly divided into peripheral adverbial and intrinsic adverbial, then the intrinsic adverbial is divided into complementary adverbial, restrictive adverbial and descriptive adverbial. According to the constituent elements, Han-Han adverbial is divided into thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. The third chapter mainly compares and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of multi-layer peripheral adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han. Korean-Chinese peripheral adverbial, which occupies the front of the subject in syntactic position, presents semantic features such as [relevance], [commentary], [restriction] and so on. The constituent elements are as follows: thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. In general, the sequential order of Han-Han multi-layer peripheral adverbial appears as [relevance] [commentary] [limit], and in the constituent elements, the order of non-topic adverbial is prior to the title meta-adverbial. The sentence order of Han-Han multi-layer adverbial is related to [commentary] [limited] in terms of the constituent elements of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial. The Korean adverbial belongs to the intrinsic adverbial, and the Chinese one belongs to the peripheral adverbial. The fourth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences in the order of adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han Chinese. The word order of Korean multilayered intrinsic adverbial is the descriptive adverbial of restrictive adverbial complement, and the order of Chinese multilayered intrinsic adverbial is limited adverbial descriptive adverbial complement. The fifth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences of Korean-Chinese multi-level meta-adverbial order. The sequential order of Korean multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial, [object-case] item meta-adverbial, [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [time-case] item meta-adverbial; The sequential order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial. The subadverbial order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is: [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case]; The Korean meta-adverbial is an intrinsic adverbial, while the Chinese one is a peripheral adverbial. The sixth chapter mainly contrasts and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of adverbial conjunction between Han and Han. The sequential order of adverbial adverbs in Han and Han is that the adverbs of relevance adverbs are critical adverbs with definite adverbs describing imitative adverbs. Korean negative adverbs are closest to predicates, while Chinese negative adverbs shift with non-localization. The seventh chapter mainly describes and analyzes the sequence of Chinese multi-level complement and its corresponding expression in Korean. As a result, the complement of Chinese is the same as adverbial, which is the complement of predicate, corresponding to the adverbial or predicate of Korean. Chapter 8 is the conclusion, which mainly explains the basic work, innovation and deficiency of this topic.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146;H55
本文编号：2438963
[Abstract]:From the perspective of typology, this paper makes a contrastive analysis of the sequence of consecutive adverbial words in Korean and Chinese languages. The full text is divided into eight chapters. The first chapter mainly explains the significance, the present situation, the related theories and methods of the research on the order of multiple adverbial conjunctions in Han and Han dynasties. The in-depth study of word order types provides the theoretical basis and methodological guidance for this paper to describe and analyze the word order of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial conjunction in as much detail as possible. Chapter two is a contrastive analysis of the syntactic features and semantic categories of Han-Han adverbial. Han-Han adverbial, as a state element of predicate, presents three kinds of conditions: freedom, non-freedom and semi-freedom. According to the syntactic-semantic and pragmatic features, the Han-Han adverbial is firstly divided into peripheral adverbial and intrinsic adverbial, then the intrinsic adverbial is divided into complementary adverbial, restrictive adverbial and descriptive adverbial. According to the constituent elements, Han-Han adverbial is divided into thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. The third chapter mainly compares and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of multi-layer peripheral adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han. Korean-Chinese peripheral adverbial, which occupies the front of the subject in syntactic position, presents semantic features such as [relevance], [commentary], [restriction] and so on. The constituent elements are as follows: thematic meta-adverbial and non-thematic meta-adverbial. In general, the sequential order of Han-Han multi-layer peripheral adverbial appears as [relevance] [commentary] [limit], and in the constituent elements, the order of non-topic adverbial is prior to the title meta-adverbial. The sentence order of Han-Han multi-layer adverbial is related to [commentary] [limited] in terms of the constituent elements of Han-Han multi-layered adverbial. The Korean adverbial belongs to the intrinsic adverbial, and the Chinese one belongs to the peripheral adverbial. The fourth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences in the order of adverbial conjunctions between Han and Han Chinese. The word order of Korean multilayered intrinsic adverbial is the descriptive adverbial of restrictive adverbial complement, and the order of Chinese multilayered intrinsic adverbial is limited adverbial descriptive adverbial complement. The fifth chapter is a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences of Korean-Chinese multi-level meta-adverbial order. The sequential order of Korean multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial, [object-case] item meta-adverbial, [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [time-case] item meta-adverbial; The sequential order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is as follows: [root case] question meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case] item meta-adverbial [neighbor case] item meta-adverbial [object case] item meta-adverbial. The subadverbial order of Chinese multi-level item meta-adverbial is: [root-case] item meta-adverbial [conditional case] item meta-adverbial [related case]; The Korean meta-adverbial is an intrinsic adverbial, while the Chinese one is a peripheral adverbial. The sixth chapter mainly contrasts and analyzes the similarities and differences of the order of adverbial conjunction between Han and Han. The sequential order of adverbial adverbs in Han and Han is that the adverbs of relevance adverbs are critical adverbs with definite adverbs describing imitative adverbs. Korean negative adverbs are closest to predicates, while Chinese negative adverbs shift with non-localization. The seventh chapter mainly describes and analyzes the sequence of Chinese multi-level complement and its corresponding expression in Korean. As a result, the complement of Chinese is the same as adverbial, which is the complement of predicate, corresponding to the adverbial or predicate of Korean. Chapter 8 is the conclusion, which mainly explains the basic work, innovation and deficiency of this topic.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146;H55
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 巴旭华;韩国学生汉语多项状语习得的偏误分析及教学对策[D];沈阳师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2438963
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2438963.html
