英汉植物隐喻的认知比对研究作
发布时间：2019-05-06 07:10
【摘要】：隐喻研究传统上局限于修辞层和语言层。随着当代认知语言学的突起，人们越来越关注英语学习过程中的认知机制，，同时也发现推动人类认识的概念系统是隐喻性的，而概念系统又是语言形成的始作俑者和主要认知机制，所以语言也是隐喻性的。近二十年来，隐喻研究在认知科学领域的发展得到了越来越广泛的认同。Lakoff和Johnson的“概念隐喻理论”从认知的角度拓宽了隐喻的研究范围。认知理论认为隐喻不仅仅是一种语言现象，更是一种认知现象，是我们认知和理解世界的工具。 语言中存在着大量的植物隐喻，但是关于这方面的研究还很少。研究植物隐喻的论文只局限于从寻求喻体与本体的相似性的角度解释一些隐喻现象，侧重于隐喻在作品中产生的效果和美化作用。研究还是没有把隐喻当作人类的一种认知方式来研究，更多是从文化涵义，联想意义来分析。而且目前国内学者对于植物隐喻化及英汉植物隐喻对比所作的研究还不多，以往对于 英汉植物词对比所做的研究主要集中于其文化意义的差异，语料上也仅限于某几个特定的植物的对比。我认为其缺陷在于没有系统地讨论这些植物隐喻从植物作为源域向其他目标域的投射过程，忽略了隐喻产生的过程和读者理解隐喻的认知过程，没有从更深层次的思维，认知的角度来探讨植物隐喻。有鉴于此，本文以植物隐喻为研究内容，尝试从认知的角度，来对比分析英语汉语中的植物隐喻。本文采用描述性和解释性的研究方法，详尽探讨两种语言在植物隐喻表达上的异同。本文不仅从认知隐喻视角研究对英汉隐喻的异同描写上，且还要探讨背后思维方式的异同。研究发现，首先植物隐喻是概念隐喻的产物，人们用植物隐喻来理解和体验那些不熟悉的，抽象的，难以捉摸的事物。英汉植物隐喻的投射模式存在着共性，其共同点揭示了英汉植物隐喻同样源于身体经验，具有共同的心理基础。同时，英汉语在隐喻表达上也存在着很大的差异,这些差异源于文化的相对性。中西方许多独有的文化深深影响了中西方的思维和语言。 希望本研究对外语学习有所启示，对隐喻研究有所贡献。
[Abstract]:The study of metaphor has traditionally been limited to rhetoric and language. With the emergence of contemporary cognitive linguistics, people pay more and more attention to the cognitive mechanism in the process of English learning. At the same time, it is also found that the conceptual system that promotes human cognition is metaphorical. The conceptual system is the initiator and the main cognitive mechanism of language formation, so language is metaphorical. In the past two decades, the development of metaphor research in cognitive science has been more and more widely recognized. Lakoff and Johnson's "Conceptual metaphor Theory" has broadened the scope of metaphor research from the perspective of cognition. Cognitive theory holds that metaphor is not only a linguistic phenomenon, but also a cognitive phenomenon. It is a tool for us to recognize and understand the world. There are a lot of plant metaphors in language, but there is little research on it. The study of plant metaphor is limited to explain some metaphor phenomena from the point of view of similarity between metaphor and ontology, focusing on the effect and beautification of metaphor in the works. Metaphor is still not regarded as a cognitive style of human beings, and is analyzed from cultural meaning and associative meaning. At present, domestic scholars have not done much research on plant metaphorization and comparison of plant metaphors in English and Chinese. Previous studies on plant metaphor contrast between English and Chinese are mainly focused on the differences of their cultural meanings. The corpus is also limited to a few specific plant comparisons. I think its drawback lies in the lack of systematic discussion of the process of these plant metaphors projecting from the source domain to other target domains, ignoring the process of metaphor production and the cognitive process of the reader's understanding of metaphor, and not from a deeper level of thinking. A cognitive approach to plant metaphor. In view of this, this paper attempts to make a comparative analysis of plant metaphors in English and Chinese from the perspective of cognition. In this paper, descriptive and explanatory methods are used to explore the similarities and differences in the expression of plant metaphors between the two languages in detail. This paper not only studies the similarities and differences in description of English and Chinese metaphors from the perspective of cognitive metaphor, but also discusses the similarities and differences in the way of thinking behind them. Firstly, plant metaphors are the products of conceptual metaphors. Plant metaphors are used to understand and experience unfamiliar, abstract and elusive things. The projective patterns of plant metaphors in English and Chinese share common ground, which reveals that plant metaphors in English and Chinese also originate from physical experience and share a common psychological basis. At the same time, there are great differences in metaphorical expression between English and Chinese, which are due to the relativity of culture. Many unique cultures in China and the West have deeply influenced the thinking and language of China and the West. It is hoped that this study will enlighten foreign language learning and contribute to metaphor research.
【学位授予单位】：西华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H315;H15
本文编号：2469980
[Abstract]:The study of metaphor has traditionally been limited to rhetoric and language. With the emergence of contemporary cognitive linguistics, people pay more and more attention to the cognitive mechanism in the process of English learning. At the same time, it is also found that the conceptual system that promotes human cognition is metaphorical. The conceptual system is the initiator and the main cognitive mechanism of language formation, so language is metaphorical. In the past two decades, the development of metaphor research in cognitive science has been more and more widely recognized. Lakoff and Johnson's "Conceptual metaphor Theory" has broadened the scope of metaphor research from the perspective of cognition. Cognitive theory holds that metaphor is not only a linguistic phenomenon, but also a cognitive phenomenon. It is a tool for us to recognize and understand the world. There are a lot of plant metaphors in language, but there is little research on it. The study of plant metaphor is limited to explain some metaphor phenomena from the point of view of similarity between metaphor and ontology, focusing on the effect and beautification of metaphor in the works. Metaphor is still not regarded as a cognitive style of human beings, and is analyzed from cultural meaning and associative meaning. At present, domestic scholars have not done much research on plant metaphorization and comparison of plant metaphors in English and Chinese. Previous studies on plant metaphor contrast between English and Chinese are mainly focused on the differences of their cultural meanings. The corpus is also limited to a few specific plant comparisons. I think its drawback lies in the lack of systematic discussion of the process of these plant metaphors projecting from the source domain to other target domains, ignoring the process of metaphor production and the cognitive process of the reader's understanding of metaphor, and not from a deeper level of thinking. A cognitive approach to plant metaphor. In view of this, this paper attempts to make a comparative analysis of plant metaphors in English and Chinese from the perspective of cognition. In this paper, descriptive and explanatory methods are used to explore the similarities and differences in the expression of plant metaphors between the two languages in detail. This paper not only studies the similarities and differences in description of English and Chinese metaphors from the perspective of cognitive metaphor, but also discusses the similarities and differences in the way of thinking behind them. Firstly, plant metaphors are the products of conceptual metaphors. Plant metaphors are used to understand and experience unfamiliar, abstract and elusive things. The projective patterns of plant metaphors in English and Chinese share common ground, which reveals that plant metaphors in English and Chinese also originate from physical experience and share a common psychological basis. At the same time, there are great differences in metaphorical expression between English and Chinese, which are due to the relativity of culture. Many unique cultures in China and the West have deeply influenced the thinking and language of China and the West. It is hoped that this study will enlighten foreign language learning and contribute to metaphor research.
【学位授予单位】：西华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H315;H15
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 林书武;《隐喻与象似性》简介[J];国外语言学;1995年03期
2 安志伟;;汉语动植物名词指人现象的隐喻认知研究[J];东岳论丛;2009年10期
3 沈妍斌;;从文化内涵看英汉植物比喻的语用意义[J];疯狂英语(教师版);2009年05期
4 周艳鲜;;从喻体看中英植物词汇附加意义的差异[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2008年06期
5 李茜;论英汉植物词语文化内涵[J];怀化学院学报;2004年06期
6 赵艳芳;隐喻的认知基础[J];解放军外语学院学报;1994年02期
7 唐燕萍;从认知角度看英语植物词汇的隐喻意义[J];江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版);2002年04期
8 寇艳艳;刘海燕;俞星月;;汉英植物词语的不同文化内涵分析[J];考试周刊;2008年23期
9 宋艳华;;从动植物词汇的语义内涵看中西文化的差异[J];科技信息(学术研究);2007年27期
10 高鸿雁;;汉英植物词的文化差异[J];科技信息(学术研究);2008年09期
本文编号：2469980
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2469980.html
