美洲发现“甲骨文”一案错判剖析——兼论奥尔梅克象征图画和符号
发布时间:2019-06-11 01:24
【摘要】:中美洲奥尔梅克文化中的几枚玉片刻纹被一些学者辨识为中国甲骨文及金文。在研究中发现,这些刻纹实际上是一幅完整图像被破坏后的残余部分,并非文字符号,更非中国文字。这些残余刻纹仍然保留着和传统图画一脉相承的特征,据此可以说明它们本来的图画面貌。辨识者用来佐证的一些散布于中、南美洲的"符号"也存在偶然性强、不成系统等研究方法问题。因此,"奥尔梅克刻纹为中国文字"一案不能成立。
[Abstract]:Several jade inscriptions in Olmek culture in Central America have been identified by some scholars as Chinese oracle bone inscriptions and gold inscriptions. In the study, it is found that these tattoos are actually the remnant of a complete image destroyed, not to mention a character symbol, let alone a Chinese character. These residual tattoos still retain the same characteristics as the traditional pictures, according to which their original picture appearance can be explained. Some of the symbols used by identifiers are scattered in Central and South America, and there are also some research methods such as strong contingency, unsystematic and so on. Therefore, the Olmek engraved for Chinese character case can not be established.
【作者单位】: 威廉帕特森大学艺术史系;
【分类号】:H121;K877.1
[Abstract]:Several jade inscriptions in Olmek culture in Central America have been identified by some scholars as Chinese oracle bone inscriptions and gold inscriptions. In the study, it is found that these tattoos are actually the remnant of a complete image destroyed, not to mention a character symbol, let alone a Chinese character. These residual tattoos still retain the same characteristics as the traditional pictures, according to which their original picture appearance can be explained. Some of the symbols used by identifiers are scattered in Central and South America, and there are also some research methods such as strong contingency, unsystematic and so on. Therefore, the Olmek engraved for Chinese character case can not be established.
【作者单位】: 威廉帕特森大学艺术史系;
【分类号】:H121;K877.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 唐兰;;在甲骨金文中所见的一种已经遗失的中国古代文字[J];考古学报;1957年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许明珠;;《离骚》“凤皇受诒”考论[J];安徽文学(下半月);2011年02期
2 李娜;;龙凤图腾的发展演变[J];边疆经济与文化;2011年12期
3 邹晓丽;从文化学的角度看汉字构形的史料性[J];北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2000年02期
4 张继生,雷军蓉;舞龙运动发展与前瞻[J];北京体育大学学报;2003年05期
5 邓小娟;龙图腾与“S”队形的衍生——天水地区秦安羊皮鼓舞队形的文化研究[J];北京舞蹈学院学报;2005年02期
6 邓小娟;;甘肃秦安羊皮鼓祭礼舞蹈的遗存[J];北京舞蹈学院学报;2008年04期
7 张星德;中国龙的历史文化学阐述[J];北方文物;2003年03期
8 孙昕;吴李s,
本文编号:2496893
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2496893.html