从认知语言学视角研究Dao（道/Way）的多义性及其拓展的语义概念形成
发布时间：2021-09-25 07:40
语义问题一直是传统认知语言学（CCL）和后认知语言学（NCL）的分水岭。传统认知语言学认为语言形式的存在是独立于意义，和意义无关，因此语言研究就是分析句法；而后认知语言学在语言研究过程中把对意义的研究视为不可或缺的中心话题。这一转变也体现了后认知语言学的主要特征。在认知语言学领域，存在诸多的语义构建观点和理论，如认知语法、隐喻理论、理想认知模式、合成理论等；这些理论都试图从不同的视角论述语义现象产生的机理。然而到目前为止，还没有文献表明语义概念的研究采用过本研究所用的研究方法，也没有文献报道过以往的研究曾有把不同学科中的某些研究方法用于Dao（道/way）的多义性及其拓展的研究。本论文总的指导理念是人类拥有同一的认知。在此基础上，从理论和经验出发，对语义，特别是对英、汉语Dao（道/way）的多义性及其拓展的语义概念形成进行了研究，通过对中、英文对应概念的语言表示方式翔实语料的分析，了解多义词的诸多概念与其他认知系统的关系。本研究的主要特点在于其体现了认知语言学研究的多学科性，具体地说，以心理学的格式塔理论，实证哲学中的图式理论，以及认知语言学中的重组和再生理论为核心建立的体现人类基本...
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：173 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
摘要
Abstract
List of Figures
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
1.1 Focus of the research
1.2 The materials and methods of the Research
1.3 The hypotheses of the research
1.4 Organization of the individual chapters
CHAPTER 2 CLASSICAL COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (CCL) vs. NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
2.1 Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
2.1.1 Background of Chomsky’s Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
2.1.2 Chomsky’s fundamental assumptions under Western objectivism
2.1.3 General problems with CCL
2.1.3.1 Problems with Chomsky’s Core constructions
2.1.3.2 Problems with Chomsky’s Transitivity
2.1.3.3 Problems with Chomsky’s Compositional Semantics
2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
2.2.1 The assumption of NCL on language
2.2.2 Symbolic nature of language from NCL perspectives
2.2.3 NCL view of grammar
2.2.4 NCL embodied view of language
2.2.5 NCL view on the function of language
2.2.6 NCL view of constraints on language
2.3 Summary
CHAPTER 3 G-S-R-E APPROACH TO SEMANTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POLYSEMY DAO (道/WAY) AND ITS EXTENSIONS
3.1 Embodied mechanism of language
3.1.1 Configurational structures of polysemy Dao (道/way) within G-S-R-E framework
3.1.1.1 The overlap between four principles of perception and semantic conceptualization of spatial language
3.1.1.2 The overlap between the construal of Figure - Ground and semantic conceptualization of language
3.1.2 Schema’s contribution to the general principle of meaningfulness within G-S-R-E framework
3.1.2.1 Schematic principle of organizing semantic conceptualization
3.1.2.2 Comparison and contrast of schema and Formalist rules
3.1.2.3 Schemas of Dao (道/way) at different levels of organization
3.1.3 Access to categorization: another cognitive ability relative to semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions
3.1.4 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of Metonymy and metaphor
3.1.4.1 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of metonymy
3.1.4.2 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy in terms of metaphor
3.1.5 Summary
3.2 Non-linguistic and cognitive semantics
3.2.1 Traditional view of meaning: meaning in words alone
3.2.2 NCL view of meaning
3.2.2.1. Meaning in interaction with our bodies
3.2.2.2 Conceptualization central to NCL
3.2.2.3 Composite meaning of NCL
3.2.2.4. Economy of language
3.2.3 The content and construal for semantic conceptualization
3.2.3.1 The content and construal
3.2.3.2 The content
3.2.3.3 The construal
3.2.4 Summary
3.3 Elaborate networks of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions within G- S-R-E framework
3.3.1 Meaning construction and Dynamicity
3.3.1.1 Concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/行）
3.3.1.2 Mechanism of concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/ 行）
3.3.2. Concept and mechanism of time in terms of motion way/go/move (道/路/走)
3.3.2.1 Concept Time in terms of motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
3.3.2.2 Mechanism of concept time through motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
3.3.3 Concepts right, wrong, behavior, or morality in terms of way/path (道/路)
3.3.4 Hierarchical embedding in the morphological and semantic extension of within the polysemy Dao (道/way)
3.3.4.1 Cognitive organizing systems in the extension of polysemy Dao（Way/道）
3.3.4.2 Productivity in the polysemous extension through due to topological characteristic of language
3.3.4.3 Pattern of recombination and emergency of polysemy Dao (道/Way) and its extensions
3.3.5 Summary
CHAPTER 4 IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE STUDIES
4.1 Implications of the study
4.1.1. Implications for the study of semantic conceptualization
4.1.2. Implications for language
4.1.3. Implications for philosophy
4.2 Conclusions
4.3 Future studies
Bibliography
Appendix: Polysemous meanings of Day (道/Way)
本文编号：3409358
【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】：173 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
摘要
Abstract
List of Figures
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
1.1 Focus of the research
1.2 The materials and methods of the Research
1.3 The hypotheses of the research
1.4 Organization of the individual chapters
CHAPTER 2 CLASSICAL COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (CCL) vs. NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
2.1 Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
2.1.1 Background of Chomsky’s Classical Cognitive Linguistics (CCL)
2.1.2 Chomsky’s fundamental assumptions under Western objectivism
2.1.3 General problems with CCL
2.1.3.1 Problems with Chomsky’s Core constructions
2.1.3.2 Problems with Chomsky’s Transitivity
2.1.3.3 Problems with Chomsky’s Compositional Semantics
2.2 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS (NCL)
2.2.1 The assumption of NCL on language
2.2.2 Symbolic nature of language from NCL perspectives
2.2.3 NCL view of grammar
2.2.4 NCL embodied view of language
2.2.5 NCL view on the function of language
2.2.6 NCL view of constraints on language
2.3 Summary
CHAPTER 3 G-S-R-E APPROACH TO SEMANTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF POLYSEMY DAO (道/WAY) AND ITS EXTENSIONS
3.1 Embodied mechanism of language
3.1.1 Configurational structures of polysemy Dao (道/way) within G-S-R-E framework
3.1.1.1 The overlap between four principles of perception and semantic conceptualization of spatial language
3.1.1.2 The overlap between the construal of Figure - Ground and semantic conceptualization of language
3.1.2 Schema’s contribution to the general principle of meaningfulness within G-S-R-E framework
3.1.2.1 Schematic principle of organizing semantic conceptualization
3.1.2.2 Comparison and contrast of schema and Formalist rules
3.1.2.3 Schemas of Dao (道/way) at different levels of organization
3.1.3 Access to categorization: another cognitive ability relative to semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions
3.1.4 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of Metonymy and metaphor
3.1.4.1 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy Dao (道/way) in terms of metonymy
3.1.4.2 Semantic conceptualization of polysemy in terms of metaphor
3.1.5 Summary
3.2 Non-linguistic and cognitive semantics
3.2.1 Traditional view of meaning: meaning in words alone
3.2.2 NCL view of meaning
3.2.2.1. Meaning in interaction with our bodies
3.2.2.2 Conceptualization central to NCL
3.2.2.3 Composite meaning of NCL
3.2.2.4. Economy of language
3.2.3 The content and construal for semantic conceptualization
3.2.3.1 The content and construal
3.2.3.2 The content
3.2.3.3 The construal
3.2.4 Summary
3.3 Elaborate networks of polysemy Dao (道/way) and its extensions within G- S-R-E framework
3.3.1 Meaning construction and Dynamicity
3.3.1.1 Concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/行）
3.3.1.2 Mechanism of concept change in terms of motion go/walk/move（走/ 行）
3.3.2. Concept and mechanism of time in terms of motion way/go/move (道/路/走)
3.3.2.1 Concept Time in terms of motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
3.3.2.2 Mechanism of concept time through motion way/go/move（道/路/走）
3.3.3 Concepts right, wrong, behavior, or morality in terms of way/path (道/路)
3.3.4 Hierarchical embedding in the morphological and semantic extension of within the polysemy Dao (道/way)
3.3.4.1 Cognitive organizing systems in the extension of polysemy Dao（Way/道）
3.3.4.2 Productivity in the polysemous extension through due to topological characteristic of language
3.3.4.3 Pattern of recombination and emergency of polysemy Dao (道/Way) and its extensions
3.3.5 Summary
CHAPTER 4 IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE STUDIES
4.1 Implications of the study
4.1.1. Implications for the study of semantic conceptualization
4.1.2. Implications for language
4.1.3. Implications for philosophy
4.2 Conclusions
4.3 Future studies
Bibliography
Appendix: Polysemous meanings of Day (道/Way)
本文编号：3409358
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/3409358.html
