西安市景观水体调研及富营养化控制基础研究
[Abstract]:In this study, the water quality and eutrophication degree of six landscape water bodies in Xi'an were investigated and evaluated firstly, and then two typical landscape water bodies were selected to track and monitor their water quality, phytoplankton and sediment throughout the year. On this basis, principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were used to study the relationship between water quality characteristics and dominant algae. The improved fuzzy evaluation method and the comprehensive nutrition state index method were used to evaluate the water quality and eutrophication respectively. Finally, the biological filter reactor was used to quickly treat the serious eutrophication landscape water. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the moat is serious eutrophication, Xingqing Lake and Fengqing Lake are medium eutrophication, Nanhu Lake and Hancheng Lake are light eutrophication, and Weiyang Lake is medium eutrophication. In addition, the dominant algae in Nanhu Lake were Chlorophyta phylum, and the dominant algae in the other five water bodies were all cyanobacteria. (2) the water quality of Fengqing Lake and moat showed obvious seasonal changes: the water quality of Fengqing Lake was the best in winter and the worst in summer. The main pollutants were 6 phyla 39 genera of phytoplankton detected by COD, the dominant algae were Anabaena pseudocephala, Chlorella microphylla, Chlorella oblongata and Acanthopsis sinensis, and the water quality of moat was the worst in spring and summer, and the main pollutants were TN,TP and NH3-N, and there were 7 phyla and 53 genera of phytoplankton detected in the moat. The dominant algae are Sargassum, Drum, Cystis, Cyclophyta, Cyclopsis. Therefore, the most characteristic of urban landscape water quality is seasonal difference and algae difference. In addition, The content of nitrogen and phosphorus in sediment of two water bodies also showed certain seasonality: the content of TN in the bottom of Fengqing Lake was the highest (11.04 mg/g) in spring and the lowest in summer (9.98 mg/g), while the content of TN in sediment of moat was the highest (13.52 mg/g) in winter (8.76 mg/g), and the content of TP was the highest in summer (8.76 mg/g). However, the TP of moat sediment in summer and winter was 3.95 and 2.36 times of that in Fengqing Lake, respectively. (3) the results of PCA and CCA analysis showed that PCA and DO were the most important water quality factors in Fengqing Lake. The effect of TN, mineralization on Anabaena pseudocephala was significant. Chlorella and Chlorophyta were affected by the pH of TTPTPPO43-NN. TN, and DO were the important water quality factors of Moat. The pH and salinity of Chlorophyta and Chlorophyta were the most important factors affecting the dominant alga, while Chlorophyta and Chlorophyta were the most important water quality factors in the Moat, and the pH and salinity of Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorophyta were the most important water quality factors in the Moat River, and Chlorophyta had a great effect on the dominant algae. TSD and PO43--P have great influence on the genus Nymphocystis and P. sp., and TSD and PO43--P have a great effect on the genus Nymnymus, and the degree of mineralization has a great effect on the genus Cystis and the genus Cystis. Therefore, the factors affecting the water quality of algae in different water bodies are different. (4) when the HRT is 3 h and the ratio of air to water is 2:1, The average removal rate of CHLA and COD in the total drainage of moat was 65.8 and the average removal rate of COD was 50.2and TN was 10.9and the average removal rate of NH3-N was over 90% after being treated by biological aerated filter, and the average removal rate of algae density was 86.7% and the average removal rate of TN was 10.9% and the average removal rate of NH3-N was more than 90%. In addition, the chroma decreased significantly, and the average turbidity removal rate reached 83.3%.
【学位授予单位】:西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:X52
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈昆根;姚俊杰;;景观水体生态修复[J];现代园林;2006年05期
2 邵林广;邹丹;;景观水体污染防治技术现状与发展[J];市政技术;2008年06期
3 谭海剑;潘伟斌;于海涛;;广州某景观水体应急除臭处理研究及工程应用[J];环境保护科学;2009年01期
4 李川;易威;王坚伟;;景观水体的净化方法[J];中国资源综合利用;2009年02期
5 马俊;王三反;张训江;刘海刚;;景观水体的修复技术[J];环境科学与管理;2009年05期
6 朱强;任汇东;任良志;杨玉姣;何志平;;景观水体治理技术的研究[J];环境科学与管理;2009年05期
7 彭森;谭春晓;刘星;;景观水体的循环模式研究与流场分析[J];中国给水排水;2009年11期
8 商弘;;小型污染景观水体生态修复技术探讨——以浙江海洋学院文心湖为例[J];甘肃科技;2011年02期
9 谭小琴;;成都市景观水体污染防治问题探讨[J];资源开发与市场;2012年05期
10 甘树应,杨青,潘煜,夏丹;景观水体污染处理工艺研究及工程应用[J];给水排水;2002年12期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 史京伟;吴珊;崔哲;;景观水体中微量元素对藻类繁殖的影响探讨[A];2007年全国给水排水技术信息网成立三十五周年纪念专集暨年会论文集[C];2007年
2 刘志明;严立;郑向勇;吴德意;何圣兵;孔海南;;粉煤灰吸附模拟富营养化景观水体中磷的研究[A];第二届全国环境化学学术报告会论文集[C];2004年
3 徐小牛;王勤;;合肥市城区景观水体水质特点分析[A];食品安全的理论与实践——安徽食品安全博士科技论坛论文集[C];2005年
4 任丽艳;甘庆午;;再生水回用于景观水体的富营养化问题分析[A];2012中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第二卷)[C];2012年
5 何国富;刘伟;徐慧敏;;景观水体修复方法及生态示范工程案例[A];第三届全国河道治理与生态修复技术交流研讨会专刊[C];2011年
6 赵乐军;王秀朵;刘春光;颜炳魁;;再生水回用于景观水体时富营养化趋势研究[A];全国给水排水技术信息网2009年年会论文集[C];2009年
7 李志颖;张统;董春宏;;景观水体超磁分离处理系统设计[A];2010年全国给水排水技术信息网年会论文集[C];2010年
8 黄彩娣;王燕锋;陈红萍;;上海公园富营养化景观水体的生物修复试验研究[A];上海市风景园林学会论文集[C];2005年
9 李书江;;景观水体净化技术的应用研究[A];全国排水委员会2012年年会论文集[C];2012年
10 张统;李志颖;芦小山;周勉;;人工景观水体水质保持技术[A];全国给水排水技术信息网2009年年会论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 记者 吴宏林;自治区政府参事:治理景观水体水草有三法[N];华兴时报;2009年
2 本报记者 李雪林;小区水景岂能只建不养[N];文汇报;2007年
3 方霏;人水和谐的世博水环境[N];人民公安报;2010年
4 本刊记者 谢群;深圳构筑城市与水新的平衡[N];中国水利报;2007年
5 丁利民 潘琦;上海将出台住宅水景建设规范[N];中华建筑报;2004年
6 本报记者 王素慧;用“水草”还水一个清净[N];民营经济报;2005年
7 李铁军;污水“浇出”美丽景观[N];北方经济时报;2006年
8 本报记者 李铁军;“水环境”提供“生态示范”[N];北方经济时报;2006年
9 徐瑞哲;“细菌”让十条河流变清[N];解放日报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 解岳;城市富营养化景观水体的植物修复机理及现场试验研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2011年
2 孔建;景观水体功能恢复技术研究及其环境效益评价[D];吉林大学;2006年
3 刘书宇;景观水体富营养化模拟与生态修复技术研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2007年
4 宋英伟;城市景观水体生境改善技术与机理研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 赵海江;西安市景观水体调研及富营养化控制基础研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2015年
2 侯萍;合肥市景观水体水质评价方法及“复合酶—原位生物修复法”试验的研究[D];合肥工业大学;2010年
3 刘科峰;合肥城区典型景观水体水环境变化特征及评价[D];合肥工业大学;2014年
4 薛铖;应用优化藻坪技术调控富营养化景观水体冬季氮磷研究[D];福建师范大学;2015年
5 陈彦熹;非常规水源补给型景观水体的模拟研究[D];天津大学;2010年
6 解学良;青岛高新区景观水体的富养化评价[D];青岛大学;2011年
7 朱晓燕;小型人工景观水体生物炭强化水质控制技术及滨水环境人体舒适度影响研究[D];同济大学;2008年
8 罗东;景观水体中微量元素分布特征及对水环境质量的影响研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2015年
9 李家;城市景观水体净化处理实验研究[D];安徽工业大学;2010年
10 张梁;村镇景观水体监测典型指标间相关性分析及水质模型研究[D];湖南大学;2014年
,本文编号:2220150
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2220150.html