俗世生命伦理学视域中的大学生生命教育
[Abstract]:At present, college students commit suicide, violent behavior, moral and ethical loss and other phenomena, we have to reflect on the problems in higher education, it is obvious that the lack of life education makes the development of higher education and society as a whole into a dilemma. First, higher education blurs its essential mission in social development; secondly, college students' life education ignores the characteristics of college students; finally, college students' life education lacks the pursuit of individual life meaning. In this predicament of life development, Engelhardt's worldly bioethics provides a new perspective and method for the development practice of life education in the new era background. Under the background of pluralism and collapse of religious authority, the development of life education also faces the same background. The aim of worldly bioethics is to build a bridge for the peaceful settlement of contradictions and conflicts between specific communities, and he proposes that the principle of permission is the supreme principle to be followed by all communities. Any good deed needs the permission of the subject of life to have value. The key to realize the cooperation and communication between moral aliens is to respect and understand each other's value. In terms of the background of the times and the concept of principles, the worldly bioethics has a strong adaptability to the college students' life education at the present stage, and the new concept of life education can be interpreted from its hidden implication of life education. In the perspective of worldly bioethics, the key of life education to solve multiple contradictions lies in the common value and energy of human collective subconscious consciousness, and the life education emphasizes the self-realization of individual. Finally, life education must respect the freedom of choice of the educatee, emphasize the responsibility of the educatee and pursue its own meaning of life. Therefore, in order to adapt to the pluralistic values and the increasingly materialized social environment, college students' life education must build a worldly life education framework under the theoretical foundation of worldly bioethics. First of all, life education for college students must be an education system that can contain multiple values. Education itself should embody the color of diversity. However, in order to prevent the chaos caused by diversity, we should firmly grasp the common values of the core of life. These values of life shared by all mankind are the key to conflict resolution and cooperation in life education. The application of life education in practice also needs specific ways and methods. As an important driving force of life development, goals and hopes can stimulate the potential strength of individuals. Through career planning and career guidance education for college students, they can help college students establish a clear goal. Through their own struggle to achieve their own success; By strengthening the general education curriculum, college students can learn and appreciate literature and art while indirectly feeling the common power of truth, goodness, beauty and love in human nature, so as to stimulate their inner creativity and life energy. For the growing university students, the plight is not the tragedy of life. Suffering is precisely the opportunity for life to gain great growth. College students can gain a deeper understanding of life from each suffering, and strengthen their spirit and body in suffering. Strengthen the meaning of your life. In the perspective of worldly bioethics, the key problems of college students' life education mainly include the following three aspects: first, how should college students face the pluralistic society in which they live; Secondly, the life development of college students requires them to learn to solve the conflicts between multiple values; finally, the core of life development is to pursue the significance of their own life in a society with chaotic values.
【学位授予单位】:江苏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G641
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 裴娣娜;;读懂叶澜教授及其“生命·实践”教育学派[J];当代教育与文化;2015年03期
2 刘济良;赵荣;;生命教育:道德教育的核心[J];课程.教材.教法;2013年09期
3 恩格尔哈特;张颖;;中国生命伦理学应立足本土文化[J];中国医学伦理学;2013年04期
4 万旭;郭玉宇;;中国生命伦理学的当下难题及发展趋势分析[J];中国医学伦理学;2012年05期
5 H.Tristram Engelhardt.Jr.;郑林娟;;平等之后:一些关于医疗保健筹资的批判性反思[J];医学与哲学;2012年03期
6 李芳;李洋;孙莹炜;;大学生生命观教育的历史与现状综述[J];北京教育(德育);2010年11期
7 罗崇敏;;全面实施“三生教育” 建设现代教育价值体系[J];昆明学院学报;2009年01期
8 杜治政;;文化多元与全球化境遇中的生命伦理学[J];科学文化评论;2008年04期
9 孙慕义;;生命伦理学的知识场域与现象学问题[J];医学与哲学(人文社会医学版);2008年02期
10 冯建军;;生命教育的内涵与实施[J];思想·理论·教育;2006年21期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 郑林娟;允许(Permission)作为一种程序原则是否可行?[D];山东大学;2012年
2 刘铁芳;生命与教化[D];湖南师范大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 张豫林;论加缪的荒诞哲学[D];福建师范大学;2014年
2 陈雯霆;允许原则—恩格尔哈特生命伦理学思想研究[D];湖北大学;2012年
3 赵坤;大学生生命教育研究[D];东北师范大学;2007年
4 邓艳平;当代美国生命伦理学中原则之争述评[D];湖南师范大学;2003年
,本文编号:2315005
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2315005.html