王铎与傅山行草书的比较研究
[Abstract]:This article takes the walking cursive script of Wang Duo and Fu Shan as the research object, under the background of the great change in the late Ming Dynasty, through the comparative study of each aspect of the two kinds of cursive writing, then to highlight their commonness and individuality, so that they can have the appearance of the cursive script. At the same time, it also expounds the influence of the two kinds of cursive calligraphy and the enlightenment to the higher calligraphy education and the contemporary calligraphy world. In the course of the study, the author tries to divide the article into five parts and make a comparative study of Wang Duo and Fu Shan's cursive writing. The first chapter introduces the background of the research object and how the era has changed, including social thoughts and cultural landscape, material conditions and calligraphy and painting activities, as well as the development of cursive writing in the late Ming Dynasty. The second chapter begins to compare and study the causes of the two styles of cursive writing, including life experience and political experience, aesthetic thought and calligraphy proposition, as well as the new comparison between the learning process and the following ancient times, among which, the study of the course of the book. This paper uses the book theory of Zhao Zhenqian, a tutor, to systematize, theorize and generalize it. The third chapter makes a comparative study on the main visual elements of calligraphy, that is, artistic language, including brushwork, calligraphy, ink, rules and so on, at the same time, The metaphysical connotation and rich implication of calligraphy works are also important objects of comparison. The fourth chapter mainly narrates Wang Duo and Fu Shan's traveling cursive book to domestic and overseas influence. The fifth chapter mainly analyzes and studies the enlightenment of Wang Duo and Fu Shan's calligraphy spirit to contemporary higher calligraphy education and the calligraphy world, including the advanced calligraphy education and the putting forward and application of the idea of "Sixteen character principle". And Wang Duo and Fu Shan calligraphy spirit of cultural value, and lead to some thinking. This paper not only compares the similarities and differences between Wang Duo and Fu Shan's artistic language, but also compares the similarities and differences in the origin of the style of writing cursive writing between Wang Duo and Fu Shan, as well as the similarities and differences of the overall meaning and connotation of the works. The angle of comparison does not only focus on techniques and visual aesthetics, but also extends to the methods of learning books, aesthetic thoughts, life experiences, and influence on domestic and foreign countries and so on. Wang Duo and Fu Shan's methods of learning science are systematized and theorized as the "16-character policy" (in the language of Mr. Zhao Zhenqian): "to carry forward tradition and extensive specialization, to encourage the creation and advocacy of individuality", This scientific learning method, concise and concise, provides a scientific training model for higher calligraphy education, as well as a better and deeper study of traditional calligraphy, as well as calligraphy creation based on it. It provides a kind of guiding theory with strong maneuverability.
【学位授予单位】:河南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:J292.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;“全国第三届行草书大展”征稿启事[J];书画世界;2012年03期
2 姜秀真;行草书及其创作浅谈[J];淮北煤师院学报(社会科学版);1996年04期
3 ;全国第一届行草书大展作品选[J];书法之友;1997年02期
4 郑可春;;不拘一格 海纳百川——邓大强硬笔行草书作品欣赏[J];中国钢笔书法;2008年02期
5 徐攀;简论行草书的笔顺[J];成都师专学报;2001年03期
6 杜旭光;;晋唐两期行草书笔法比较[J];安阳师范学院学报;2007年04期
7 吴富民;;书写行草楹联探索[J];老年教育(书画艺术);2009年12期
8 黎向群;;清朗爽劲 飘逸遒美——薛始亨其人及其行草书册[J];书法;2012年09期
9 朱以撒;;行草书审美心理流变[J];书画艺术;2013年01期
10 ;风行太湖·无锡行草书八人作品展在无锡博物院举行[J];书画艺术;2013年01期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 丁芒;;行草书幅的结构审美[A];春华秋实——江苏省美学学会(1981—2001)纪念文集[C];2001年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 桂运安;全国第三届行草书展在肥举行[N];安徽日报;2012年
2 记者 叶玉跃;全国第三届行草书展合肥开展[N];美术报;2012年
3 首席记者 肖宇辉;杨代飞:行草书风灵动雄浑[N];昆明日报;2011年
4 李克俭;儒雅之道 风骨之力[N];美术报;2008年
5 江美英;牛家湘行草书印象[N];中国文化报;2003年
6 记者 董晓雅;墨海融情 翰书一生[N];中华新闻报;2008年
7 本报记者 杨秀贵;大气磅礴 厚重生动[N];中国贸易报;2010年
8 杨春;天津国拍融入北京秋拍[N];人民政协报;2006年
9 郭舒权;楷书为何在“国展”中缺席?[N];文汇报;2008年
10 山东 袁云鹏;齐燕铭的一副行草书七言联[N];中国文物报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李大蒙;字组与气势[D];杭州师范大学;2015年
2 李佳兴;王铎书法对我行草书创作的影响[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2015年
3 王洁玫;风格与习气[D];杭州师范大学;2016年
4 宋世桢;颜真卿“尚意”行草书风研究[D];山东大学;2016年
5 孟令琦;王铎与傅山行草书的比较研究[D];河南大学;2015年
6 胡亚萍;黄道周行草书管窥[D];河南大学;2010年
7 常海琴;古代行草书中“字组”现象研究[D];河南大学;2011年
8 梁文斌;行草书斗方创作的形式研究[D];中国美术学院;2011年
9 魏信孟;二十世纪八十年代以来行草书创作理念及其演变研究[D];江西师范大学;2012年
10 冷辉道;王铎行草书的形态变化研究[D];南昌大学;2013年
,本文编号:2376498
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2376498.html