徐州地区传统自然村与新农村的景观评价对比研究

发布时间：2019-01-08 19:48

【摘要】：文章利用景观评价中的心理物理学评价模式中的美景度评价法,通过选取江苏省徐州市的4个传统自然村和3个新农村示范村作为采样地区,以照片为媒介,以100位在校大学生和100位公众为评价者,对比研究了徐州地区传统自然村及新农村的景观视觉质量及其景观特征的关系。研究结果表明,水体的可接近性、陆地植被覆盖度、景观色彩数量这三个景观要素特征是徐州地区传统自然村景观审美体验可靠而稳定的预测者。同时,景观小品、视野开敞度对新农村景观审美体验产生显著的影响。景观小品的出现,提高了人们对于新农村景观的审美体验。而在视野开敞度方面,人们倾向于拥有一定私密性的空间,随着开敞度的增加人们的审美体验降低。文章还通过比较研究的方法,试图探究徐州地区传统自然村和新农村景观特征和视觉质量的差异。结果显示,在15个景观特征中,二者有7个景观特征存在显著差异:植被的外貌形态、建筑的新旧、铺装园路面积、景观色彩数量、色彩对比度、环境维护程度、景观小品。同时,文章还得出新农村景观评价得分均值高于传统自然村。也就是说,当前新农村景观建设一定程度上改善了农村的居住环境。然而结果还显示,尽管新农村景观评价得分均值高于传统自然村,但是仍有一些传统自然村的景观样本在景观评价中获得了较高的得分。这表明传统自然村景观中的一些景观特质对新农村景观建设同样具有借鉴意义。此外,文章还就群体特征对景观审美体验的影响做了研究,试图探寻不同群体之间的景观审美体验水平是否存在差异,文章以年龄、性别、专业背景和生活环境四方面作为群体特征的划分依据,研究得出群体特征对人们的景观审美体验产生一定的影响。
[Abstract]:By using the method of beauty degree evaluation in the psycho-physical evaluation model of landscape evaluation, this paper selects four traditional natural villages and three new rural demonstration villages in Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, as sampling areas and takes photographs as the medium. Taking 100 college students and 100 public as evaluators, the relationship between the visual quality and landscape characteristics of traditional natural villages and new rural areas in Xuzhou was studied. The results show that the characteristics of water accessibility, land vegetation coverage and landscape color are reliable and stable predictors of traditional natural village landscape aesthetic experience in Xuzhou. At the same time, landscape sketches, visual field open to the new rural landscape aesthetic experience has a significant impact. The appearance of landscape sketch improves the aesthetic experience of new rural landscape. In the field of visual field, people tend to have a certain private space, with the increase of openness, people's aesthetic experience decreases. The paper also attempts to explore the differences of landscape characteristics and visual quality between traditional villages and new rural areas in Xuzhou by means of comparative study. The results showed that there were significant differences in 7 of the 15 landscape features: the appearance of vegetation, the new and old buildings, the area of paved garden road, the quantity of landscape color, the contrast of color, the degree of environmental maintenance, the landscape sketch. At the same time, the paper points out that the new rural landscape evaluation score is higher than the traditional natural village. In other words, the current new rural landscape construction to a certain extent improved the rural living environment. However, the results also showed that, although the average score of new rural landscape evaluation was higher than that of traditional natural villages, there were still some traditional natural village landscape samples obtained a higher score in landscape evaluation. This indicates that some landscape characteristics in traditional natural village landscape are also useful for the construction of new rural landscape. In addition, the article also makes a study on the influence of group characteristics on landscape aesthetic experience, and tries to find out whether there are differences in landscape aesthetic experience between different groups. Professional background and living environment as the basis of the division of group characteristics, it is concluded that the group characteristics of people's landscape aesthetic experience has a certain impact.
【学位授予单位】：中国矿业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU982.29

【相似文献】