徐悲鸿与现代性
发布时间:2018-06-04 05:22
本文选题:徐悲鸿 + 现代性 ; 参考:《美术研究》2017年02期
【摘要】:本文主题是现代性视角的徐悲鸿研究。1、现代性问题纷繁复杂,本文着重现代性理解之一的马克斯韦伯路线,并以列奥·斯特劳斯的《现代性的三次浪潮》为切入点。但西方现代性的开启与成果早已不仅仅只属于西方,而属于全世界人民共同的财富。现代性并不等于西方化。"五四"运动是中国现代性启蒙的真正开篇和时代强音。反思的"五四"是中国现代性重临的起点和永恒的目标。2、徐悲鸿是"五四"新文化运动的一员。他选择并为之奋斗一生的写实主义的终极原因即是"五四"精神洗礼的自由民主与科学之追求,晚清及至"五四"精神的现代性启蒙是徐悲鸿写实主义的思想史基础。3、本文对徐悲鸿的主张近一百年来大约遭到的四方面批评、质疑进行了"现代性"问题纠缠的学理性清理,和现代艺术思想史的剖析。4、以公共精神的关怀者阐释也改造世界意义是画家徐悲鸿的现代人文知识分子的角色认定,并极富行动体现。5、徐悲鸿毕生坚持文化建设、保藏和文化输出,他的亚洲足迹和欧洲巡展都在避免民族自卑而不成其为"被看"的"他者"形象,改写着中国文化在世界的弱势乃至失声状态。坚持民族文化的身份认同,努力与第一世界建设平等对话关系,这使得徐悲鸿极富后殖民时代的当代意义。
[Abstract]:The theme of this paper is the study of Xu Beihong from the perspective of modernity. The problem of modernity is complicated. This paper focuses on Marx, one of the understanding of modernity. Weber line, and with Leo Strauss's "three waves of modernity" as the starting point. However, the opening and achievement of western modernity have long belonged to the common wealth of people all over the world. Modernity does not mean westernization. " The May fourth Movement is the real opening of the Enlightenment of modernity in China and the strong tone of the times. "May 4th" is the starting point and eternal target of Chinese modernity. Xu Beihong is a member of "May 4th" New Culture Movement. The ultimate reason for the realism he chose and fought for all his life was the pursuit of freedom, democracy and science in the baptism of the May 4th spirit. The modernity enlightenment of the spirit of the late Qing Dynasty and the May 4th Movement was the foundation of the ideological history of Xu Beihong realism. This paper, in view of the four aspects of criticism about Xu Beihong's proposition in the past 100 years, questioned the academic rationality of the entanglement of "modernity". And the analysis of the history of modern art ideology. 4. The interpretation of the world significance by the soliciters of public spirit is the role of modern humanistic intellectuals of the painter Xu Beihong, and it is extremely rich in action. Xu Beihong insists on cultural construction all his life. Preservation and cultural export, his Asian footprint and European tour both avoid the national inferiority complex and become the "other" image, rewriting the weak and even silent state of Chinese culture in the world. Adhering to the identity of national culture and striving to establish an equal dialogue relationship with the first world makes Xu Beihong extremely rich in the contemporary significance of the post-colonial era.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学艺术学院;徐悲鸿艺术研究院;徐悲鸿艺术研究院学术部;
【分类号】:J203
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 朱平;;实验水墨对中国“现代性”的艺术表征[J];美术界;2013年06期
2 殷双喜;城市·水墨·现代性[J];美术研究;2001年02期
3 刘静轩;;现代性视阈中的时装流行趋势研究[J];美术大观;2012年10期
4 荣剑;;重返现代——社会转型时代的艺术转型[J];美术研究;2007年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 安鹏飞;设计艺术中的现代性思考[D];天津工业大学;2008年
2 袁小慧;从现代流行女装文化看女性的现代性[D];陕西师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:1976142
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huihuayishu/1976142.html