建构融会、超越中西的文艺理论新体系——读王锺陵先生《20世纪中西文论史》

发布时间：2017-12-28 10:38

本文关键词：建构融会、超越中西的文艺理论新体系——读王锺陵先生《20世纪中西文论史》　出处：《上海文化》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：王锺陵先生的新著《20世纪中西文论史》以不同于西方文论与中国传统文论的宏大理论视野对20世纪的西方文论和中国文学与戏剧的文体流变进行了全面而深入的论述,不仅完成了文论史研究的革新,而且也建立起了融合、超越中西的文艺理论新体系。在文论史研究革新方面,王锺陵先生将文论史放在20世纪中西文化思想内在矛盾的运行轨迹中展开论述,揭示了中西方文论演变的内在规律。在文艺理论体系建设方面,王锺陵先生将文体作为理论体系的重点,以新存在论、新诠释学为基础,以文艺史运动规律与各种文艺体类的本体论为核心展开论述。一方面探究文体特征的哲学依据,另一方面探究文体变化的历史规律。在研究方法方面,王锺陵先生以活的逻辑学思路叙述文论史的动态规律,以跨学科的方法探讨文论史的复杂性,并以心理感悟的方法把握理论家的内心世界,使文论史变得更加鲜活。
[Abstract]:Mr. Wang Zhongling's twentieth Century "Chinese and Western literary history" style evolution in the western literary theory of Western Literary Theory in the twentieth Century grand view and Chinese literature and drama theory and traditional culture Chinese conducted a comprehensive and in-depth discussion, not only completed the study on history of innovation, but also establish a fusion beyond the Western literary theory system. In the reform of literary history, Mr. Wang Zhongling put the history of literary criticism on the track of the internal contradictions between Chinese and Western culture and thought in twentieth Century, and revealed the inherent law of the evolution of Chinese and Western literary theories. In terms of the construction of literary theory system, Mr. Wang Zhongling takes stylistics as the focal point of the theoretical system, based on the new ontology and new hermeneutics, and takes the movement rule of art history and the ontology of all kinds of literature and art as the core. On the one hand, it explores the philosophical basis of stylistic features, and on the other hand, explores the historical laws of stylistic changes. In terms of research methods, Mr. Wang Zhongling described the dynamic rule of literary history by means of living logic. He explored the complexity of literary history by interdisciplinary approach, and grasped the inner world of theoreticians in the way of psychological perception, which made the history of literary theory more vivid.
【作者单位】：教育部社科中心;
【分类号】：I0
【正文快照】： 季羡林先生在反思20世纪中国人文社会科学研究成果时感慨,我们中国人似乎没有什么拿得出手的成果。季羡林先生的这个世纪之问,是20世纪中国人文社会科学研究的尴尬。中国哲学史界出于对“照着说”、“跟着说”的不满,提出了“接着说”,意图按照自己的文化传统说话。但局限于接

【相似文献】