作为日常语言的“理论”与作为学术语言的“理论”——新世纪中国文论研究中一种值得辨析的混淆

发布时间：2018-01-05 22:29

本文关键词：作为日常语言的“理论”与作为学术语言的“理论”——新世纪中国文论研究中一种值得辨析的混淆　出处：《学术月刊》2012年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新世纪以来,在文化研究持续影响下,中国文论界关于学科性质的反思正趋深入。但各种相关讨论时常微妙地混淆着"理论"一词作为日常语言的意义与作为学术语言的意义,从而妨碍着持不同立场的学者间对话的有效性。作为日常语言的"理论",在希腊语言与拉丁语言中都并不是形而上学的同义语,而是一种超越常识却最终仍回归着常识、联系着实践、实现着抽象逻辑与生活世界的有机统一的思想活动,在形而上学与形而上层面上,分别具有不同特征。作为学术语言的"理论",则是20世纪西方文论发展中一个特定阶段,需要被置于文学理论、理论与后理论这一错综学术嬗变格局中,主要从文化批评理论的角度加以特定的理解。两种语言意义最为根本的区别在于:在日常语言中,文学理论是理论的一部分;在学术语言中,理论则是文学理论的一部分。经此辨析,这两种语言意义才可互为参照系,实现在"理论之后"背景下的有效互补,从而发展出我们自己面向新世纪、具有积极前景的后理论。
[Abstract]:Since the new century, the continuing impact of cultural studies, field reflection on the disciplinary nature of literary theory is becoming Chinese deeply. But various discussions often subtly confuse the word "theory" as a daily language as the academic significance and the meaning of language, which hinders the effectiveness of the dialogue between scholars hold different positions. As a daily language "theory" in the Greek language and Latin languages are not synonymous with metaphysics, but a kind of go beyond common sense, but it will eventually return a common sense, with practice, realize the organic unity of abstract logic and the life world, the activity of thought in metaphysics and metaphysical level, respectively, with different characteristics as an academic language. "Theory" is the twentieth Century western literary theory in the development of a particular stage, need to be placed in literary theory, theory and the theory of evolution after the intricate academic pattern, mainly From the angle of cultural criticism to specific understanding. The two languages of the most fundamental difference is that: in everyday language, literary theory is a part of the theory; in the academic language, theory is a part of literary theory. Through this analysis, the two languages can cross reference significance to achieve effective complementary, "after theory" in the background, so as to develop our own facing the new century, after the theory has a positive outlook.

【作者单位】：华东师范大学中文系;
【基金】：2011年国家社科基金项目“叙事逻辑理论创新研究:从文艺叙事到文化叙事”(11CZW004)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I0
【正文快照】： 一、两种语言意义的混淆同样意在达成客观性,自然科学主要通过对知识的说明进行,人文社会科学则主要通过“同时进行的、对于知识与(知识的)社会条件的批评性反思”来实现。①在一种人文理论中,“知识”是理论的内容,指该种理论所涉及的经验事实;“知识的社会条件”则是理论的

【参考文献】