文学性叙事与主体的第三种命运

发布时间：2018-01-05 22:36

本文关键词：文学性叙事与主体的第三种命运　出处：《理论月刊》2013年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："叙事自我"是对反人本主义浪潮的一次重要修正。"叙事自我"是否具有主体性?对这个问题的回答有两种。一种是以丹尼特为代表的后结构主义主体观,认为叙事自我的观念仅具有形式上的实用价值。另一种是以麦金太尔为代表的,主张叙事自我具有弱的内在价值,即弱的主体性。但是由于前者强调主体的功能性,否认其主体性,伦理和道德的维度被遮蔽了。而后者所采用的历史性自我叙事方式则依赖于文化共同体,并且有实体化这种共同体的倾向。利科以文学性叙事的方式来建构自我观念,同时克服了功能性和实体化的两种倾向。"叙事自我"成为了一种介于功能与实体之间的,具有独立性的社会产品。从而避免在"全有"或"全无"主体性的问题上作出非此即彼的选择,并由此展现出主体的第三种命运。
[Abstract]:"Self narrative" is an important revision of anti humanism wave. "Self narrative" is the subjectivity? The answer to this question in two ways. One is the subject of post structuralism represented by Dennett's view that the concept of self narrative form only has practical value. One is represented by Macintyre, advocated self narrative has intrinsic value is weak, weak subjectivity. But because the function of the former emphasizes, deny the subjectivity, ethical and moral dimensions has been obscured by the latter. The historic self narrative way depends on culture and community. This entity has a tendency to community. In Ricoeur's literary narrative way to construct self concept, and overcome the two tendencies and functional entity. "Self narrative" has become a kind of between function and entity, is unique The product of the society. To avoid making choices in either this or that "all or nothing" subjectivity on the issue, and thus show the main third kinds of destinies.

【作者单位】：浙江大学人文学院哲学系;
【分类号】：I04
【正文快照】： 正如弗莱德·多尔迈所言:“主体性观念已在丧失着它的力量,这既是由于我们时代的具体经验所致,也是因为一些先进哲学家们的探究所致。”[1](P1)在笛卡尔式的主体哲学摇摇欲坠的今天,一种具有历史主义倾向的“叙事自我”(Narrative Self)理论重新唤起了对于“自我”这个陈旧观

【共引文献】