文学研究也要接“地气”

发布时间：2018-01-06 21:06

本文关键词：文学研究也要接“地气”　出处：《求是》2013年23期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正文学研究要不要接"地气",怎么接"地气"?当下,不少文学评论和文学史研究在"兜圈子":只在作家作品——批评家、文学史家这个圈子里打转,很少有人把目光放到圈子之外的普通读者身上。当然,这并不是说这种重在作家作品评价的研究不好、不重要。相反,文学研究在作家作品的一亩三分地上深耕细作,是很有必要的。我们所要强调的是,现在大多数文学研究只在"内循环"式研究的一条道上走,不考虑普通读者的接受情况,割裂了作品与社会群体之间的联系。今天的文学研究之所以单调乏味、缺少活力,恐怕与这种做法有很大关系。文学研究离不开"理想读者"。所谓"理想读者",并不是大众眼里高不可及的专业评论家,而是被很多人忽视的普通读者。很多情况下,能够最直接、最真实地反映作家作品实
[Abstract]:Should the study of orthodox literature be connected with "ground air", and how to "land air"? Nowadays, a lot of literary criticism and literary history research are in "circles": only in the circle of writers, critics, literary historians, few people focus their eyes on ordinary readers outside the circle. Of course. This is not to say that this kind of research, which focuses on the evaluation of writers' works, is not good or important. On the contrary, it is very necessary for literary research to be cultivated in three acres of the writers' works. What we want to emphasize is. At present, most literary studies are only on the way of "internal circulation" study, and do not consider the acceptance of ordinary readers, and break up the connection between works and social groups. Today's literary studies are monotonous. The lack of vitality may have much to do with this practice. Literary research cannot be separated from "ideal readers". The so-called "ideal readers" are not highly accessible professional critics in the eyes of the public. It is an ordinary reader who is ignored by many people. In many cases, it is the most direct and truest reflection of the writer's work
【作者单位】：山东大学;
【分类号】：I06
【正文快照】： 文学研究要不要接“地气”,怎么接“地气”?当下,不少文学评论和文学史研究在“兜圈子”:只在作家作品——批评家、文学史家这个圈子里打转,很少有人把目光放到圈子之外的普通读者身上。当然,这并不是说这种重在作家作品评价的研究不好、不重要。相反,文学研究在作家作品的一

【相似文献】