当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文学理论论文 >

公共艺术介入功能空间的非零和效应研究

发布时间:2018-02-03 16:00

  本文关键词: 功能空间 艺术介入 公共艺术 零和效应 非零和效应 出处:《江西师范大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:建筑空间的本质为“用”早有定论。①但由于空间的语言建构极其丰富、活跃,致使其内涵的所指与时俱增和外延的界定不断拓展。当“空间”一词前缀“公共”时,,传统的空间意涵已经开始注入民主、开放、交流、共享的现代构筑意义②;而将“公共”一词前缀于“艺术”时,则“空间”的形态便由此打上了“场域精神”的烙印。公共—空间—艺术,毫无疑问,“公共”赋予了“空间”与“艺术”的现代词性内涵,而基于“公共”前提的空间与艺术的嫁接则成就了公共艺术的产生。这里,艺术介入空间的过程即为公共艺术的形式体现,其本质是构筑或注入功能空间某种“场域精神”。但是,在景观的功能空间构筑中,通过艺术的介入来营造具有某种“场域精神”的公共氛围,存在如何协调解决二者之间的矛盾冲突的难题。功能空间追求的是使用的最大化效应,而艺术介入则有可能在强化自身效应的同时削弱空间的使用功能,反之也然。二者之间的结合是否能通过协调实现一种互补的关系,即获得趋向双赢的非零和效应呢?实际上,这个问题的探究即是本文将要着手研究的重点,也是笔者选题并决定撰写该文的初衷和努力的方向。 文章由绪论;公共空间与艺术介入;艺术介入的零和效应与非零和效应;艺术与功能整合的双赢结果;结语等五个部分组成。绪论阐述了论文的选题目的与意义和研究的方法、现状与难点以及创新点;第二部分通过完形学的体验形式对空间与艺术的公共性及其结合的途径、特性与方法进行了解析,认为基于功能属性的艺术介入是人与物交流互动的体验传感器,其最终目的还是为了营造具有某种“场域精神”的公共氛围;第三部分侧重分析了功能空间与艺术介入的矛盾冲突,以及获得非零和效应的协调的办法,双赢的途径是强化实地调查、民意调研和科学论证的环节;第四部分对艺术与功能空间结合的传统典范、成功案例、营构模式,进行了可行性的研析和构想式的展望——艺术生活化,生活艺术化是艺术介入功能空间的非零和效应的双赢结果;最后是结语,概括了本文的研究成果,明确对艺术介入功能空间的理念与价值的重新认识,是旨在探索出一套可供公共艺术实践参考的可行性营构模式,为我国公共艺术理论体系的深化与普及贡献些许力量。
[Abstract]:The essence of architectural space is "use". 1. But because of the language construction of space is extremely rich and active. When the term "space" is prefixed with "public", the traditional meaning of space has begun to inject democracy, openness and communication. The significance of modern construction of sharing; When the word "public" is prefixed to "art", then the form of "space" is marked with the "field spirit". "Public" endows "space" and "art" with the modern connotation of part of speech, while the grafting of space and art based on the premise of "public" makes the public art come into being. The process of art intervention in space is the form of public art, and its essence is to construct or inject some kind of "field spirit" into the functional space. However, in the construction of the functional space of landscape. Through the intervention of art to create a kind of "field spirit" of the public atmosphere, there is a problem of how to coordinate the conflict between the two, the functional space is to pursue the maximum effect of use. The artistic intervention may weaken the use of space while strengthening its own effect, otherwise, whether the combination of the two can achieve a complementary relationship through coordination. That is, to achieve a win-win non-zero-sum effect? In fact, the exploration of this problem is not only the focus of this paper, but also the original intention and direction of the author's choice. The article is introduced; Public space and artistic intervention; The zero-sum effect and non-zero-sum effect of artistic intervention; The win-win result of the integration of art and function; The introduction explains the purpose and significance of the topic, the research methods, the present situation and the difficulties, and the innovation points. The second part analyzes the publicness of space and art and the ways, characteristics and methods of combining space and art through the experience form of Gestalt. The author thinks that the artistic intervention based on the function attribute is the experience sensor of the interaction between people and objects, and its ultimate purpose is to create a public atmosphere with a kind of "field spirit". The third part focuses on the analysis of the conflict between the function space and the art intervention, as well as the way to get the coordination of the non-zero sum effect. The win-win way is to strengthen the field survey, public opinion survey and scientific argumentation. 4th part of the traditional model of the combination of art and functional space, successful cases, the mode of construction, the feasibility of analysis and conceptualized outlook-the life of art. The artistry of life is the win-win result of the non-zero sum effect of artistic intervention in the functional space. The last part is the conclusion, which summarizes the research results of this paper, and clarifies the re-understanding of the concept and value of the function space of art intervention, which is aimed at exploring a set of feasible models for reference in public art practice. For our country public art theory system deepening and popularizing contribution some strength.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:TU986;J0

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王中;发展与回归——城市发展中的公共艺术理念[J];雕塑;2002年04期

2 马钦忠;公共艺术与城市品牌的塑造[J];雕塑;2004年01期

3 翁剑青;;公共艺术的社会方式与文化反思[J];雕塑;2008年04期

4 吴若虎;;中国公共艺术的反思[J];风景园林;2011年06期

5 王中;;当代公共艺术视野中的城市形态[J];北京规划建设;2006年04期

6 金峰;;重新解读公共艺术与公共生活[J];风景园林;2011年06期

7 孙振华;;公共艺术四题[J];公共艺术;2009年01期

8 杨达;;心之完形与物之完形——以考夫卡格式塔心理学的视角看江南私家园林[J];华中建筑;2008年06期

9 袁运甫;公共艺术的观念·传统·实践[J];美术研究;1998年01期

10 伍悦;;融合与多元的描述——公共空间中的公共艺术[J];上海艺术家;2009年06期



本文编号:1487783

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/1487783.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c9619***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com