剧本中冲突性话语研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 12:03

本文选题：剧本　切入点：冲突性话语　出处：《延边大学》2006年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：冲突性话语，也称为冲突话语、争论性话语等，指言语交际过程中产生的争执类话语。从80年代开始，这一有趣的语言现象进入了话语分析者的研究视野。冲突性话语是一个很有价值的研究课题。然而，，我国的冲突性话语研究无论是在广度上还是在深度上都远不及国外的研究，还有很广阔的研究空间。本文以剧本台词为语料来源，运用描写和解释相结合的方法，通过对剧本中冲突性话语的定性及定量描述，揭示冲突性话语的开始方式、展开方式和结束方式，以此阐释冲突性话语的构建并对此做出语用学上的解释。全文共分五章。第一章是绪论部分。包括研究目的与意义，研究方法、内容及理论依据，语料来源及符号说明，以及相关研究现状。第二章介绍剧本中冲突性话语的开始方式。以出现频率的高低为序，可分为表态、阐述、指令及询问4类开始方式。各类又可以分为若干小类，如：表态类又分为肯定类、指责类、赞赏类等8小类，其中具体包括“肯定(?)直接反对式”、“指责(?)打断式”、“道歉(?)质疑式”等形式。第三章介绍剧本中冲突性话语的展开方式。按照其出现的频率高低，依次为综合式、反问质疑式、各抒己见式、直截了当式、解释原因式、重复再用式、否定回避式、更正表态式、言词谩骂式和诙谐幽默式10种类型。第四章介绍剧本中冲突性话语的结束方式。可将其归纳为7种方式，依次为：转移话题式、妥协让步式、第三方介入式、一方获胜式、退出式、客观环境中止冲突式及诙谐幽默式。第五章用关联理论和面子理论对剧本中的冲突性话语做出解释，提出冲突性话语无论具体形式怎样，都可以分为由于交际双方信息意图和交际意图非关联而形成的两类。本文最后探讨了面子威胁行为及语用距离和冲突性话语的构建形式及结束方式之间的联系。
[Abstract]:Conflict discourse, also known as conflict discourse, argumentative discourse, etc., refers to the dissension that occurs in the course of verbal communication. This interesting language phenomenon has entered the perspective of discourse analysts. Conflict discourse is a valuable research topic. However, the study of conflict discourse in China is far less than that in foreign countries in terms of its breadth and depth. There is still a lot of room for research. Taking script lines as the source of the corpus and using the method of combining description and explanation, this paper reveals the starting, developing and ending modes of conflicting discourse through the qualitative and quantitative description of the conflicting discourse in the script. The thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, including the purpose and significance of the research, research methods, content and theoretical basis, the source of the corpus and the description of symbols, as well as the current situation of relevant research. The second chapter introduces the starting mode of conflict discourse in the script. In the order of occurrence frequency, it can be divided into four types: declaration, elaboration, instruction and inquiry. Blame class, praise class and so on 8 subcategories, including specifically "affirmative?" (direct opposition "," blame "? (the "break", "apologize"? Questioning, etc. The third chapter introduces the mode of development of conflict discourse in the script. According to the frequency of its appearance, it is in turn the comprehensive type, the counter-questioning type, the different expression type, the direct type, the explanation type, the repeated use type, the negative evasive type. There are 10 types of correction, verbal abuse and humorous humor. Chapter 4th introduces the ending mode of conflict discourse in the play. It can be divided into 7 ways, which are: topic shifting, compromise, third party intervention, winning by one side, withdrawal, etc. The objective environment stops the conflict and the humor. Chapter 5th uses relevance theory and face theory to explain conflicting discourse in the script, and proposes conflict discourse regardless of its specific form. It can be divided into two categories: the information intention and the non-relevance of the communicative intention. Finally, the paper discusses the relationship between face threatening behavior and pragmatic distance, and the form of construction and conclusion of conflicting utterance.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：I053

【引证文献】