中国文学作品修辞翻译研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 17:57

本文选题：修辞格　切入点：翻译　出处：《上海外国语大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】： 众所周知,翻译工作既繁难复杂而又令人神往。由于修辞语言的广泛运用,翻译中的种种矛盾又都缘于不同语言和文化之间的不对等。因此,在一种语言中使用的修辞格很难在另一种语言中找到与之完全对应的修辞格,这便使得修辞翻译困难重重。本文作者重点对奈达翻译理论的“功能对等”和纽马克的“翻译与文化”理论进行了阐述,得出翻译实践离不开翻译理论为指导,但译者不能期望有任何放之四海而皆准的翻译模式和翻译理论可以遵循。因此作者指出在翻译中国文学作品中的修辞格时,要正确理解以上提到的两种翻译理论并能灵活运用各种翻译方法。通过对多篇中国文学作品中的修辞格翻译实例的分析,本文探讨了修辞格翻译需要正确处理好的两个问题:修辞格蕴涵的文化因素和修辞格所折射出的中西两种文化的不同点。并在此基础上提出修辞格翻译的一些规则和方法,意在使中国文学作品中修辞格翻译既能最大限度地体现“功能对等”又能达到“跨文化”交流的目的。谈到中国文学作品中的修辞格翻译时必定会涉及到异化和归化翻译之争。对于这两种翻译方法,不同的人有不同的偏爱,在翻译实践中,仁者见仁,智者见智,因为两种方法各有其优缺点。本文没有深入探讨这两种翻译方法,而是通过实例分析得出:如果译文能达意、传神和表形,无论是异化还是归化,都是可行的。文章分五部分:第一部分是该文的介绍,指出修辞翻译研究的重要性。文中不仅简要介绍了一些翻译理论和中国文学作品中修辞格翻译的实例,更重点分析、比较了一些修辞格翻译的不同译本,在此基础上提出中国文学作品中修辞格翻译的行之有效的翻译方法,译文既要忠实原文又能确保译文读者领会原文中的修辞美。第二部分着重阐述了奈达和纽马克的翻译理论,强调修辞格翻译应该努力做到内容和形式的对等,并且跨越文化障碍,实现跨文化交流,这样的译文才能称得上优秀之作。同时指出,译者不能禁锢于某一翻译模式和翻译理论,而是应该灵活运用各种翻译理论和翻译方法。第三部分,从中国文学作品中的一些可译修辞格着手,通过分析比较,并对一些修辞格翻译实例进行修正和完善,从而提出作者自己的参考译文。第四部分,从语言学和文化的角度出发,分析了造成中国文学作品中一些修辞格无法翻译的原因。因为汉英两种语言和文化的诸多差异,中国文学作品中的确存在
[Abstract]:As we all know, translation is both complicated and fascinating.Due to the wide use of rhetorical language, all kinds of contradictions in translation are due to the inequivalence between different languages and cultures.Therefore, it is difficult to find the corresponding figure of speech in another language, which makes rhetorical translation difficult.The author focuses on Nida's translation theory "functional equivalence" and Newmark's "Translation and Culture" theory, and concludes that translation practice can not be separated from translation theory.However, translators cannot expect any universal translation model and translation theory to be followed.Therefore, the author points out that in translating the rhetorical devices in Chinese literary works, we should correctly understand the two translation theories mentioned above and be able to apply various translation methods flexibly.Based on the analysis of several examples of rhetorical translation in Chinese literary works, this paper discusses two problems that need to be properly handled in rhetorical translation: the cultural factors implied by rhetorical devices and the differences between Chinese and western cultures reflected by rhetorical devices.On the basis of this, some rules and methods of rhetorical translation are put forward in order to make the rhetorical translation in Chinese literary works embody "functional equivalence" to the maximum extent and achieve the purpose of "cross-cultural" communication.When it comes to rhetorical translation in Chinese literary works, there is bound to be a dispute between foreignization and domestication.For these two translation methods, different people have different preferences. In translation practice, different people have different opinions, because each method has its own advantages and disadvantages.This paper does not probe into these two translation methods in depth, but through the analysis of examples, it is concluded that if the translation can achieve meaning, evangelism and appearance, whether it is alienation or domestication, it is feasible.The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction of this paper, pointing out the importance of rhetorical translation.This paper not only briefly introduces some translation theories and examples of rhetorical translation in Chinese literature, but also analyzes and compares the different versions of some rhetorical translation.On this basis, an effective translation method for rhetorical translation in Chinese literary works is put forward. The target text should be faithful to the original text and ensure that the target readers can understand the rhetorical beauty in the original text.The second part focuses on Nida and Newmark's translation theory, emphasizing that rhetorical translation should strive to achieve equivalence in content and form, and cross cultural barriers to achieve cross-cultural communication.At the same time, it is pointed out that translators should not be confined to a certain translation mode and translation theory, but should use various translation theories and methods flexibly.The third part, starting from some translatable figures of speech in Chinese literary works, analyzes and compares some examples of rhetorical translation, and then puts forward the author's own reference translation.The fourth part analyzes the reasons why some figures of speech in Chinese literature can not be translated from the perspective of linguistics and culture.Because of the many differences between Chinese and English languages and cultures, Chinese literary works do exist.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：H059;I046

【相似文献】