从“祛魅”到“返魅”—对审美自律性之考察

发布时间：2018-04-10 21:41

本文选题：审美 + 自律性　；参考：《四川大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】：本论文审视的对象是审美自律性。全文由四个部分构成：在综述部分，论文首先对研究的意义作出界定：对该问题的研究不是一个单纯的学术之争，而是直接关涉到我们当下的生存定位。接着，陈述了论文具体的运思轨迹和写作方法：以韦伯首提的“祛魅”为指导原则，以现代性和审美现代性作为背景，主要以审美价值域在现代的扩张和由此导致的审美自律性张力为突破口，对审美自律性在现代的际遇作一个总体性思考。正文第一章是对祛魅和自律性本身进行知识梳理。在对韦伯的祛魅理论进行全面梳理后，文章提出自己的祛魅观：祛魅，不仅仅是以理性祛宗教之魅，而是以理性祛文化领域中一切神圣化、终结化、权威化倾向之魅，这意味着理性也要成为被审视的对象。接着，文章通过对自律性概念本身的历史回顾，得以认定：自律性是传统社会向现代社会转变过程中文化价值域分化的另外一种表述，，是纯粹的现代性概念。第二章正式进入对审美自律性的考察。首先是对审美自律性如何在现代西学体制中获得合法性作出分析，并认为其中有三个关节点：即传统的对人的智慧结构之区分；美学的命名和成熟；以及现代美的艺术之确立。接着，论文转入对审美价值域的分析。认为现代审美实际上有两个价值取向：一是作为社会的否定力量，从对感性的肯定，走向对现存社会的批判，进而走向审美就世的本体论；一是作为既存社会的肯定力量，维持着社会体系的正常运行。审美自律性在这一过程中，起到了重要作用。但也因此造成了内部的矛盾重重。
[Abstract]:The object of this thesis is aesthetic self-discipline.The full text consists of four parts:In the summary part, the thesis first defines the significance of the research: the research on this issue is not a simple academic debate, but directly related to our current survival position.Then, the paper describes the specific thinking path and writing methods: Weber's first "disenchantment" as the guiding principle, modernity and aesthetic modernity as the background,Based on the expansion of aesthetic value domain in modern times and the resulting aesthetic self-discipline tension as a breakthrough point, the author makes a general thinking on aesthetic self-discipline in modern times.The first chapter is about disenchantment and self-discipline.After comprehensively combing Weber's disenchantment theory, the article puts forward his own disenchantment view: disenchantment is not only disenchantment by reason, but also the demoralization, termination and authoritarianism in the field of rational disenchantment.This means that reason should also be the object of scrutiny.Then, by reviewing the history of the concept of self-discipline itself, it is concluded that self-discipline is another expression of the differentiation of cultural value domain in the process of transformation from traditional society to modern society, and is a pure concept of modernity.The second chapter formally enters the investigation of aesthetic self-discipline.First of all, it analyzes how aesthetic self-discipline obtains legitimacy in modern western learning system, and points out that there are three key points among them: the traditional distinction of human wisdom structure; the naming and maturity of aesthetics; and the establishment of modern beauty art.Then, the thesis turns to the analysis of the domain of aesthetic value.It is believed that there are two value orientations in modern aesthetics: first, as the negative force of society, from the affirmation of sensibility to the criticism of the existing society, and then towards the ontology of the aesthetic world, the other is the positive force of the existing society.Maintain the normal operation of the social system.Aesthetic self-discipline plays an important role in this process.But it also created internal contradictions.
【学位授予单位】：四川大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：I01

【引证文献】