德莱塞的《金融家》与朱秀海的《乔家大院》商业伦理比较

发布时间：2018-05-05 09:03

本文选题：比较文学 + 美国小说　；参考：《山西大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《金融家》是德莱塞的一部伟大的美国商界小说,堪称空前绝后;《乔家大院》是朱秀海反映晋商的典型之作,随着晋商文化的兴起,越来越受到了世界各国的广泛关注。本文作者从商业伦理的角度对两部小说作了平行比较研究,通过比较作者旨在加深对两部小说的了解,进一步加深对美国及中国伦理的认识,最主要的是通过对影响两部小说主人公柯帕乌与乔致庸商业伦理的社会背景、创作背景及作者创作心理的研究,作者指出不同的社会背景,不同的创作背景以及作者的不同的创作心理决定了小说主人公不同的商业伦理,因此,我们不能用一个民族的伦理标准来衡量与评价另一民族文化背景下的人物,这样做是不科学的,是没有任何意义的。本文作者首先分析了影响《金融家》及《乔家大院》两部作品商业伦理的社会背景,创作背景及作者的创作心理;其次,作者从四方面客观的呈现与比较了柯帕乌与乔致庸两位主人公所反映的商业伦理的异同。在比较的过程中作者对两位主人公的商业伦理只作了客观的比较与分析,而没有褒扬或否认他们的伦理行为。最后,结论部分作者指出用中国的伦理标准去否认柯帕乌的伦理行为是不合理的,没有意义的,也是不公正的;我们不能用中国的伦理标准定义柯帕乌为负面人物,或定义乔致庸为典范式的正面人物,而应该客观辩证地分析他们的伦理行为。作者提倡把人物放于其所处的特定环境中给与其客观的分析与评价,而不能用一个民族的伦理标准去衡量另一民族人物的伦理行为。
[Abstract]:"financier" is a great American business novel by Dreiser, which can be called unprecedented. "Qiaojia Courtyard" is a typical work of Zhu Xiuhai reflecting Shanxi merchants. With the rise of Shanxi merchants' culture, it has been paid more and more attention to all over the world. From the perspective of business ethics, the author makes a parallel comparative study of the two novels, through which the author aims to deepen his understanding of the two novels and further deepen his understanding of the ethics of the United States and China. The author points out different social backgrounds through the study of the social background, creative background and author's creative psychology that influence the business ethics of Cowperwood and Qiao Zhiyong, the protagonists of the two novels. Different writing backgrounds and the author's different creative psychology determine the different business ethics of the protagonist of the novel. Therefore, we can not use the ethical standard of one nation to measure and evaluate the characters in the cultural background of another nation. This is unscientific and meaningless. The author first analyzes the social background, the background of creation and the author's creative psychology of the business ethics of the two works "financier" and "Qiaojia Courtyard". The author objectively presents and compares the similarities and differences of business ethics between Cowperwood and Qiao Zhiyong. In the process of comparison, the author only makes an objective comparison and analysis of the business ethics of the two protagonists, and does not praise or deny their ethical behavior. Finally, the author points out that it is unreasonable, meaningless and unfair to deny Cowperwood's ethical behavior by using Chinese ethical standards, and we cannot define Cowperwood as a negative character by using Chinese ethical standards. Or define Qiao Zhiyong as an exemplary person, and analyze their ethical behavior objectively and dialectically. The author advocates that people should be given objective analysis and evaluation in their specific environment, and not be judged by the ethical standards of one nation.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：I0-03;I106.4

【参考文献】