论反讽模态

发布时间：2018-06-01 02:12

本文选题：反讽模态 + 传统反讽　；参考：《湖南科技大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 反讽是中西文艺批评的基础理论。从古希腊、雅典时期到现代语义学、语用分析时期,从苏格拉底到米克、哈桑,从中国的社会反讽到西方式技巧,反讽多被当作修辞技巧、文本结构与创作原则来看待;新批评以来,作为一种对待世界的方法,反讽被当作动态的文化模态,从文化批判、文化研究的角度重新认识与评估其概念、性质、功能、意义。反讽模态即用模态对已有反讽理论进行归整。作为一种文化现象,反讽模态是反讽过程中形成的固定功能状态,既涵括一般性反讽,又掺揉反讽稳定功能范式,还蕴含反讽不同语境条件下性质、功能、意义的嬗变,用模态寄意在突出其动态特征。以新批评为过渡形态将其分作传统模态与现代模态两种,前者基本形成古典修辞反讽模态、德国浪漫主义的诗性哲学反讽模态、新批评的文本诗学反讽模态三种历时形态,其审美特征表现在内层意义的能指与所指、矛盾的双重形式结构、情感与符号上。后者主要形成词语反讽模态、话语反讽模态、主题反讽模态三种共时形态,其审美特征表现在不确定性、陌生化、语用化上。从实用性技巧经诗性哲学、文本诗学再到当下语用、语义分析,是从实践到理论再回到实践的辩证检验过程,促成反讽模态一次次理论飞跃。同时,在历史流变中标志出反讽模态处于漂流的发展趋势。任何理论范畴、艺术门类的建立都存在特定的哲学基础。根据黑格尔哲学理论,反讽模态的哲学审美构建主要反映在存在性与对象性两方面,分别从可能化、现实化、必然化与主体性、否定性、批判性展开。作为一种前期性构建,为以后继续研究拓宽空间。反讽模态的多维度批评实践主要从修辞学、诗语、叙事学与接受美学等修辞与文学及现代学科层面展开,具体表现在反讽模态源于修辞性技巧,本质是一种对话与解答;既是诗歌语言的组织特点,又是诗歌内义的平衡原则;采用本述与反述方式,反讽视角灵活多变;从读者中心与本文中心两个循环体展开心理接受。作为思想生命之自由与文学艺术之思的结晶品,反讽模态将社会批判与对人本身、人性、生命存在的反思两相结合来实现与深化自身美学意义。
[Abstract]:Irony is the basic theory of Chinese and western literary criticism. From ancient Greece, Athens period to modern semantics, pragmatic analysis period, from Socrates to Meek, Hassan, from Chinese social irony to Western skills, irony is often regarded as rhetorical skills, text structure and creative principles. Since the new criticism, as a way of dealing with the world, irony has been regarded as a dynamic cultural mode, and it has been re-recognized and evaluated from the angle of cultural criticism and cultural research in terms of its concept, nature, function and significance. The ironic modal is used to integrate the existing theories of irony. As a cultural phenomenon, the mode of irony is a fixed functional state formed in the process of irony, which includes both general irony and the stable functional paradigm of irony, as well as the transmutation of nature, function and meaning of irony under different context conditions. Its dynamic characteristics are highlighted by modal signalling. Taking the new criticism as the transitional form, it is divided into the traditional mode and the modern mode. The former basically forms the classical rhetorical irony mode, the German Romantic poetic philosophical irony mode and the new criticism's textual poetic irony mode three diachronic forms. Its aesthetic characteristics are embodied in the signifier and signifier of inner meaning, the contradictory dual formal structure, emotion and symbol. The latter mainly forms three synchronic forms: verbal irony mode, discourse irony mode and thematic irony mode. The aesthetic features of the latter are uncertainty, strangeness and pragmatics. From practical skills to poetic philosophy, text poetics to present pragmatics, semantic analysis is a dialectical test process from practice to theory and back to practice, which promotes the theoretical leap of irony mode again and again. At the same time, in the historical evolution, the ironic mode is in the development trend of drift. The establishment of any theoretical category and art category has a specific philosophical basis. According to Hegel's philosophical theory, the philosophical aesthetic construction of irony mode is mainly reflected in the aspects of existence and object, which are carried out from possibility, reality, inevitability and subjectivity, negation and criticism respectively. As a kind of early-stage construction, it will broaden the space for further research. The multi-dimensional criticism practice of irony mode is mainly carried out from rhetoric, poetry, narratology and receptive aesthetics in rhetoric, literature and modern disciplines, which is embodied in that irony mode originates from rhetorical skills and is essentially a kind of dialogue and solution. It is not only the organizational feature of poetic language, but also the balance principle of poetic meaning; adopting the way of this and the reverse, the perspective of irony is flexible and changeable; and the psychological acceptance is carried out from the reader center and the center of this article. As the crystallization of the freedom of thought and the thought of literature and art, irony combines social criticism with reflection on human beings, human nature and existence of life to realize and deepen its own aesthetic significance.
【学位授予单位】：湖南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I04

【引证文献】