论后现代挪用艺术的法律保护困境

发布时间：2018-06-25 23:19

本文选题：法律与文艺 + 判词艺术　；参考：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年01期

【摘要】：《中国古代判词艺术的形态学分析》提出,中国古代判词从语体上可分为语判和书判,从语言形式和风格上可分为骈判、散判和花判,从使用主体上可分为批词和判词、审语和判语。波兰导演基耶斯洛夫斯基在"《十诫》之五.杀人短片"中,对作为宗教戒律的"不可杀人",作了全新的现代阐析,由此也引出一个文艺与法律的关系的问题。法律有它自身的立场,而艺术的叙事也有它特有的逻辑。但它们的终极目标是一致,可以在一定程度上相互补充。这是《"不可杀人"的现代阐析》的基本观点。《论后现代挪用艺术的法律保护困境》则认为,依据版权法"保护表达不保护思想"的二分原则,借用已有作品表达进行再创作的后现代挪用艺术要么被拒之于版权保护的门外,要么深陷侵权的泥潭。然而,从认识论来说思想/表达间并不存在通常认为的明确界限,表达是能指与所指的统一,思想与形式的重合。机械割裂思想/表达,既不利于艺术繁荣,又损害了版权法的发展完善。
[Abstract]:A morphological Analysis of the Art of Ancient Chinese judgments suggests that ancient Chinese judgments can be divided into sentence and book judgment in style, parallel judgment in language form and style, and judgment in flower in form and style, and in terms of the subject of use, it can be divided into critical words and judgments. The trial language and the judgment language. Polish director Kieslowski in the fifth of the Ten Commandments. In the short film of murder, "can't kill", as a religious precepts, makes a new modern analysis, which also leads to a question of the relationship between literature and art and law. Law has its own stand, and the narrative of art has its own logic. But their ultimate goal is to be consistent and to some extent complementary. This is the basic view of the Modern explanation of "not to kill". "on the dilemma of legal protection of post-modern misappropriation of art" holds that, according to the dichotomy principle of copyright law, "protect the expression of unprotected thought", The post-modern misappropriation of art, which is expressed by existing works, is either rejected from copyright protection or mired in infringement. However, from the perspective of epistemology, there is no clear boundary between thought and expression. Expression is the unity of signifier and signifier, and the coincidence of thought and form. Mechanical separation of thought / expression is not conducive to the prosperity of art, but also damages the development and perfection of copyright law.
【作者单位】：湘潭大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省法学研究基地一般项目:“批判法学在中国”(编号:09fx06010)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：J110.9;D913

【参考文献】