德里达文学理论批评思想与中国文论话语的转换

发布时间：2018-07-10 06:00

本文选题：德里达的文学理论批评思想 + 中国文论　；参考：《兰州大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 德里达文学理论批评思想与中国文论话语的转换是一个纷繁复杂、不断变换的动态过程。德里达解构理论对西方“逻各斯中心主义”的批判、对“互文性”的论述及其“文学是一种建制”的观点，都顺利在中国找到了生根发芽的土壤并形成了相应的批评实践。而中国文学理论话语也正是吸纳了德里达的文学理论批评思想的精髓，对原有的批评模式进行了深刻的反思、批判，进而促使固有的批评话语发生变化。首先，从传播的纬度看，由于文本本身的晦涩难懂和不同传播者的文化背景、传播的途径以及翻译的滞后等因素的影响，被传播的思想与源思想之间发生一定程度的偏离。其次，从接受的纬度来看，，德里达思想仅仅是涌入中国文坛的众多理论流派之一家，处于被选择的地位，作为接受者，理论界的学人们的心态是复杂的，理论立场、学术心态、方法论等都会影响接受。最后，从应用的纬度看，中国文论话语的转换本身是一面镜子，文学创作自觉不自觉地解构宏大叙事的趋向，诱使批评家对一些具有解构主义特质的文学文本进行解构主义批评、阐释。当然，理论的传播、接受与应用这三者之间并没有不可逾越的鸿沟，实际上三者是难于分割、密切关联的。本文分别以清晰可辨的三部分来论述，只是为了便于问题的展开。
[Abstract]:The transformation between Derrida's critical thought of literary theory and the discourse of Chinese literary theory is a complicated and dynamic process. Derrida's deconstruction theory criticizes the "logos centrism" in the West, discusses "intertextuality" and "literature is a kind of system", all of them find the soil to take root and form the corresponding critical practice in China. Meanwhile, the discourse of Chinese literary theory also absorbs the essence of Derrida's literary theory criticism thought, and deeply reflects on and criticizes the original critical mode, which makes the inherent critical discourse change. First of all, from the perspective of communication, due to the obscurity of the text itself and the influence of the cultural background of different communicators, the channel of communication and the lag of translation, there is a certain degree of deviation between the transmitted thought and the source thought. Secondly, from the perspective of acceptance, Derrida's thought is only one of the many theoretical schools that pour into the Chinese literary world and is in the selected position. As a receiver, the mentality of the scholars in the theoretical circle is complicated, the theoretical stand, the academic mentality, Methodology can influence acceptance. Finally, from the perspective of application, the transformation of Chinese literary discourse itself is a mirror, whether literary creation consciously deconstructs the trend of grand narration. It induces critics to criticize and interpret some literary texts with deconstruction characteristics. Of course, there is not an insurmountable gap between the spread of theory, acceptance and application. In fact, the three are difficult to separate and closely related. This paper discusses the problem in three distinct parts, just for the sake of the problem.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：I06

【引证文献】