作为方法的“文学性”
发布时间:2018-01-20 15:02
本文关键词: 学术随笔 吴晓东 现代文学 一本 语言学角度 八十年代 何其芳 历史小说 文学比较 文本内部 出处:《读书》2014年08期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:正当看到《文学性的命运》时,"命运"这么沉重的话题让我以为这可能是一本较艰深的著作。阅读时才发现相当一部分是学术随笔:带个人体温的文字,有着作者独特的视角和个人化经验,同时又不乏严谨而审慎的学理,从中可以看出吴晓东对文学过往与现实的精微体察;从体例上看这或许是作者的有意追求,因为即便是对于同样的问题,如现代文学与风景的发现,作者选录的也是《孤独的人才能发现风景》、《拟像的风景》等更富个人化的文字,而非《郁达夫与中国现代"风景的发现"》,这类在笔者看来无疑更为"专业"
[Abstract]:Just as I saw the Literary Destiny, the heavy topic of Destiny made me think it might be a more difficult book. When I read it, I found out that quite a few were academic essays: words with personal body temperature. With the author's unique perspective and personal experience, and at the same time, there is no lack of rigorous and prudent academic theory, from which we can see Wu Xiaodong's fine understanding of the literary past and reality; In style, this may be the author's deliberate pursuit, for even for the same problems, such as the discovery of modern literature and landscape, the author chooses "the lonely man to discover the landscape." More individualized words such as "simulated scenery", rather than "Yu Dafu and the Discovery of Landscape in Modern China", which undoubtedly seem to me to be more "professional".
【分类号】:I0
【正文快照】: 当看到《文学性的命运》时,“命运”这么沉重的话题让我以为这可能是一本较艰深的著作。阅读时才发现相当一部分是学术随笔:带个人体温的文字,有着作者独特的视角和个人化经验,同时又不乏严谨而审慎的学理,从中可以看出吴晓东对文学过往与现实的精微体察;从体例上看这或许是作
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 摩罗;;重新发现劳动的诗意[J];社会科学论坛(学术评论卷);2007年02期
,本文编号:1448631
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/1448631.html