《金瓶梅》与《源氏物语》人物形象比较研究

发布时间：2018-02-11 22:36

本文关键词： 《金瓶梅》《源氏物语》人物形象现实主义比较研究　出处：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《源氏物语》是世界首部长篇小说,也是日本文学史上第一部现实主义风格的小说,其出现对日本的小说创作特别是物语文学产生了深远的影响。《金瓶梅》是中国首部现实主义风格的长篇小说,为中国小说现实主义创作的进一步发展奠定了基础。《金瓶梅》和《源氏物语》不仅都熟练采用现实主义手法,且在具体创作中也存在诸多可比较之处,特别是人物形象方面,都塑造了具有高度真实性和典型性的人物形象。目前学界对这一方面的研究并未予以重视,还存在进一步深化的空间。本文将从现实主义创作手法入手,从四个方面对两书的人物形象塑造方法展开研究。在心理描写上,《源氏物语》比《金瓶梅》有所发展,但在肖像描写、语言描写、动作描写方面,《源氏物语》总体上都不及《金瓶梅》进步。一、肖像描写。《金瓶梅》抓住特征简笔勾勒人物形象时更为细致,《源氏物语》则较多的呈现出一种印象式描述。侧面烘托和反复描写手法的运用上,《金瓶梅》相对比较匮乏,使用较少,而《源氏物语》则运用熟练。同时两书又都存在类型化和概念化的不足；二、动作描写。《金瓶梅》对人物动作的描写呈现出特写式、多样性和对比强烈的特点,而《源氏物语》则体现为印象式、广泛性和反差平和的特点。三、语言描写上,《金瓶梅》的人物语言体现出高度的个性化和俚俗化,对话较为激烈,然而内心独白发展不够。《源氏物语》人物语言表现出较为一致的贵族化和优雅化倾向,人物对话不及《金瓶梅》发达,而人物独白却相对进步；四、心理描写。《源氏物语》在随文刻画心理活动和内心独白的运用上都是《金瓶梅》所不能及的,然而在梦境和幻觉的使用上《金瓶梅》已经达到自觉阶段,《源氏物语》却还停留在自发阶段；最后一章梳理中日现实主义文学的发展脉络,以及两书在现实主义文学发展史上的地位。同时从创作背景、文学思潮两方面分析《金瓶梅》在人物形象塑造方面总体上比《源氏物语》进步的原因。
[Abstract]:The Story of Genji is the first novel in the world and the first realistic novel in the history of Japanese literature. Its appearance has exerted a profound influence on Japanese novel creation, especially on the literature of the object language. Jin Ping Mei is the first Chinese novel with realistic style. It lays a foundation for the further development of realism in Chinese novels. Jin Ping Mei and Genji Tale not only skillfully use realistic techniques, but also have many comparable points in their specific creation, especially in the image of characters. At present, scholars have not paid much attention to this aspect, and there is still room for further deepening. This article will start with the realistic creation technique, from four aspects to carry on the research to the two books' character image shaping method. In the psychological description, the "Genji Tale" is more developed than "Jin Ping Mei", but in the portrait description, the language description, In terms of movement description, the "Genji" is not as advanced as "Jin Ping Mei" on the whole. Portrait description. "Jin Ping Mei" is more meticulous when it captures the features of a simple brush to outline the character's image, while the "Genji" presents a more impressionistic description. In the use of side foil and repeated description techniques, "Jin Ping Mei" is relatively scarce. Less is used, and Genji is skillful. At the same time, the two books also have the deficiency of typology and conceptualization; second, the description of action. < Jin Ping Mei > shows features of close-up, diversity and strong contrast in the description of characters' movements. On the other hand, the character language of Jin Ping Mei is highly individualized and vulgar, and the dialogue is more intense, in terms of language description, the character language of Jin Ping Mei is highly individualized and vulgar, and it is characterized by impressions, extensiveness and peace of contrast. However, the development of inner monologue is not enough. The character language shows a more consistent tendency of aristocrat and elegance. The character dialogue is not as developed as Jin Ping Mei, but the character monologue is relatively advanced. Psychological description. "the Story of Genji" is beyond the reach of Jin Ping Mei in depicting psychological activities and the application of inner monologues. However, in the use of dreams and hallucinations, Jin Ping Mei has reached a conscious stage, while the Story of Genji is still in the spontaneous stage; the last chapter combs the development of realistic literature between China and Japan. And the status of the two books in the history of the development of realistic literature. At the same time, from the background of creation and the literary trend of thought, the author analyzes the reasons why Jin Ping Mei has made progress in the aspect of character image shaping than that in the Story of Genji on the whole.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I0-03;I106.4

【参考文献】