接受理论与解构主义的阅读差异

发布时间：2018-02-13 02:41

本文关键词： 接受理论解构主义阅读理论　出处：《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：接受理论与解构主义的阅读理论构成了西方20世纪后期文学理论中一次鲜明的理论转向。在这一理论转向中,读者这一以往备受忽视的要素一跃成为文学四要素中的主导因素,从而掀起了阅读理论中的一场读者革命。虽然,接受理论与解构主义在阅读理论中有许多共性,但是,其差异亦同样明显,具体展现在三个方面:第一,接受理论将作者看作读者阅读的合作者,而解构主义的阅读则绝然地否定作者的存在;第二,接受理论强调阅读作品是要体现读者的创造性并最终确认一种意义,而解构主义则把阅读看作是读者解构文本符码的能指游戏;第三,接受理论十分强调阅读的历史语境,而解构主义的阅读理论则表现出一种超历史语境与反人文性的游戏姿态。这三组差异的比较,揭示了接受理论与解构主义是两种不同范式的阅读理论。
[Abstract]:The reception theory and the deconstructionist reading theory constitute a clear theoretical turn in the western literature theory in the late 20th century. In this theoretical turn, the reader, a neglected element in the past, has become the dominant factor in the four elements of literature. This set off a reader revolution in reading theory. Although reception theory and deconstruction theory have many commonalities in reading theory, the differences are also obvious in three aspects: first, The reception theory regards the author as the collaborator of the reader's reading, while the deconstructionist reading absolutely negates the author's existence. Secondly, the reception theory emphasizes that the reading works are meant to embody the reader's creativity and ultimately confirm a kind of meaning. Deconstructionism regards reading as a signifier game for readers to deconstruct text codes. Thirdly, reception theory emphasizes the historical context of reading. On the other hand, the deconstruction theory of reading shows a cross-historical context and anti-humanism game posture. The comparison of the three sets of differences reveals that reception theory and deconstruction are two kinds of reading theories of different paradigms.
【作者单位】：南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：I0

【参考文献】