从“文学性”到“娱乐性”——一种解构文学本质观的策略

发布时间：2018-03-05 05:35

本文选题：文学性　切入点：文学本质　出处：《文艺争鸣》2010年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从去年第1期本刊推出"关于文艺学的建构论与本质论问题的讨论"专栏,至本期,我们连续7次专栏,共发表了25篇讨论文章。现在,专栏可以告一段落,作一下小结了。由是,我们约请了中国社会科学院文学研究所党圣元教授和四川大学文学院曹顺庆教授为本专栏讨论写出阅读报告。在此,我们向专栏审读人,向所有支持本专栏讨论的论文作者和读者表示感谢。党圣元先生从本刊的专栏讨论生发开去,对国内文艺理论界近年来的相关讨论作了范围广泛、思路清晰的梳理。曹顺庆先生对当前有关本质论、建构论、关系论诸观点也作出了比较明晰的总结。有关建构论与本质论的讨论是非常有意义的,是关涉到当代中国文学实践、文学观念和文艺理论根本问题的。本栏目的终结,并不意味着讨论的结束,我们将在理论板块中继续关注和发表相关文章,以期将讨论更加深入下去。本专栏发表的论文索引附在第32页,以利读者检索。
[Abstract]:From the first issue of last year's issue of "A discussion on Constructivism and essence in Literature and Art" to this issue, we have published 25 discussion articles in seven consecutive columns. Now, the column can be concluded. Let's make a brief conclusion. Therefore, we have invited Professor Dang Shengyuan, Institute of Literature, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and Professor Cao Shunqing, School of Literature, Sichuan University, to write a reading report for this column discussion. Thank you to all the authors and readers of the papers who supported the discussion of this column. Mr. Dang Shengyuan started the discussion of this column and made a wide range of relevant discussions in the domestic literary and art theoretical circles in recent years. Mr. Cao Shunqing also made a relatively clear summary of the current views on essence, constructivism, and relation. The discussion on constructivism and essence is of great significance and is related to the practice of contemporary Chinese literature. The end of this column does not mean the end of the discussion. We will continue to pay close attention to and publish relevant articles in the theoretical section. The index of papers published in this column is attached on page 32 to facilitate readers' search.
【作者单位】：温州大学文学院;
【分类号】：I0

【共引文献】