“以头偿目”与“踌躇之路”——鲁迅与卡夫卡话语世界比较

发布时间：2018-03-17 09:57

本文选题：在场　切入点：延宕　出处：《学术月刊》2010年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在鲁迅与卡夫卡的话语世界中,"但是"、"然而"等反意连词的使用都极为频繁,这种表达上的特点与克尔凯郭尔的"反思性的悲伤"的概念深为契合。不同的是,鲁迅的话语世界有着血气充盈的"在场"感,显得血性十足,迅疾、直接、凝聚,同时也存在着高度悖论化的倾向;而卡夫卡的话语世界却是一派简洁而又神秘的"延宕"感。这种话语风格的不同源于两人价值观选择上的歧出,"以头偿目"与"踌躇之路"是对这两种价值观的最好概括。所谓"以头偿目",是指鲁迅拒绝接受任何虚设的价值高标("上帝"之类),执著于现在,把自我的生命本身作为自己反抗绝望与虚无的养料;所谓"踌躇之路",是指卡夫卡拒绝了走向信仰的行动尝试,在写作中高度抽离具体的历史感,留连于令人惊异的细致描写,努力将绝望感本身延宕成为异样的文本世界。
[Abstract]:In the discourse world of Lu Xun and Kafka, the negative conjunctions such as "but", "however" and "however" are used very frequently. This expressive characteristic is consistent with Kierkegaard's concept of "reflective sadness". Lu Xun's discourse world has the feeling of "presence", which is full of blood, appears bloody, swift, direct and condensed, and also has the tendency of highly paradoxical. However, Kafka's discourse world is a simple and mysterious sense of "delay". The difference in the style of utterance originates from the difference in the choice of values between the two people. It is best to generalize. The so-called "head compensation" means Lu Xun refuses to accept any false high value mark ("God" and so on) and insists on the present. Take the life of the self itself as the nourishment of one's own resistance to despair and nothingness; the so-called "path of hesitation" refers to Kafka's rejection of an attempt to move towards faith, the high degree of withdrawal from the specific sense of history in his writing, and the persistence of an amazing and detailed description. Try to delay the sense of despair itself into a strange world of text.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学人文学院;深圳职业技术学院;
【分类号】：I0-03

【共引文献】