当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 艺术理论论文 >

王国维“无我之境”说与艾略特“非个人化”论之比较

发布时间:2018-05-06 03:29

  本文选题:“无我之境” + “非个人化” ; 参考:《西北大学》2003年硕士论文


【摘要】: 王国维和艾略特分别是中西诗学转型期的代表性人物。他们在各自的文化领域做出了杰出的贡献,具有综合性和开创性的双重意义。王国维在融汇中西哲学和美学的基础上提出的“境界说”,以“无我之境”为艺术追求的最高境界,对我国古典诗学进行了继往开来的总结,在中国近代文学批评史上具有崇高的地位。无独有偶,欧洲著名诗人兼文学批评家T·S·艾略特,也以他类似的“无我”说的“非个人化”(Impersonal Theory又译为“非人格化”)诗学及创作,扭转了文坛的旧有的创作观念和风气,预示着西方现代主义文学创作的成熟,成为欧洲新批评理论的创始人。这两种理论在继承和发展文学传统、提倡诗人的非自我表现、追求诗歌的哲理表达、讲求诗歌的客观化表现等方面,体现出中西文论见仁见智的一致性,因此具有深远的意义和较强的可比性。本文欲围绕“无我之境”和“非个人化”的具体内涵,从两种理论的提出、生成的文化渊源、各自的影响及优缺点的比照,寻找其跨文化的规律和差异,以期对我国文艺理论研究有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Kingdom and Eliot are the representative figures in the transition period of Chinese and Western poetics. They have made outstanding contributions in their respective cultural fields, with the dual significance of comprehensiveness and originality. On the basis of combining Chinese and Western philosophy and aesthetics, Wang Guowei put forward the "realm theory", taking "the state of no self" as the highest realm of artistic pursuit, and summarized the classical poetics of our country from the future to the future. It has a high position in the history of modern Chinese literary criticism. Incidentally, T S Eliot, a famous European poet and literary critic, changed the old ideas and ethos of literary creation by translating his similar "impersonal Theory" into "impersonalization". It foreshadowed the maturity of western modernist literary creation and became the founder of European new criticism theory. These two theories, in the aspects of inheriting and developing the literary tradition, advocating the non-self-expression of the poet, pursuing the philosophical expression of the poem and emphasizing the objective performance of the poem, embody the consistency of different opinions between the Chinese and the western literary theories. Therefore, it has profound significance and strong comparability. This paper attempts to find the cross-cultural laws and differences from the point of view of the two theories, their cultural origins, their respective influences and their advantages and disadvantages, around the specific connotations of "no-self" and "impersonal". In order to our country literature and art theory research has the benefit.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2003
【分类号】:I0

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 宣庆坤;从“古雅”、“境界”理论论王国维与中国美学[J];安徽大学学报;2001年06期

2 葛桂录;论王国维的西方文学家传记[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2001年04期

3 江玉娇;艾略特文学批评理论与《荒原》的话语模式[J];湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2001年01期

4 黄开发;王国维的文学功用观及其现代性[J];江淮论坛;2000年05期

5 张剑;T.S.艾略特在西方──艾略特评论史述评[J];外国文学评论;1995年02期

6 吴新云;“非我之路”上的苦行者——《荒原》创作心理透视[J];外国文学评论;1997年01期

7 陆建德;艾略特:改变表现方式的天才[J];外国文学评论;1999年03期

8 张松建;艾略特“非个性化”理论溯源[J];外国文学评论;1999年03期

9 文必方;论康德哲学对王国维治学中精神取向的影响[J];新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年01期

10 徐世红;析艾略特的“非人格观”[J];盐城师专学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年01期



本文编号:1850597

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/1850597.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a9630***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com