论文学鉴赏的主体介入

发布时间：2018-05-09 04:35

本文选题：文学鉴赏 + 主体介入　；参考：《暨南大学》2000年硕士论文

【摘要】： 中西文论关于文学鉴赏的主体性有许多精彩的论述。中国文论中的赋诗断章、诗无达诂、以意逆志、知音、再创造等观点，以及西方文学接受理论的具体化、视界融合、期待视界、两极、阅读常规等观点，对作者——文本——读者的三者关系进行了全方位的观照。确立了读者（鉴赏者）的主体地位，肯定了读者对文本意义的参与权，揭示了“诗人挡不住读者”的解读规律。但也存在着概念表述不准确、过分夸大读者作用等缺憾。中西文论关于文学鉴赏主体性的论述，衍生出两种主体介入范式，即“传统范式”和“现代范式”。传统范式的核心是“走近作者” 和“创造性背离”的对立统一。读者可能在再现作者意图和文本意义的基础上进行有限的再创造。现代范式的核心是读者完全不受文本的制约，可以自由地发明和创造意义。传统范式可适当地限止读者的“创造性背离”，不使其走得太远，但又使读者的想象力和创造力受到一定程度的束缚；现代范式为读者拓宽了自由创造的空间，，但又容易导致读者的随心所欲和作品客观意义价值的丧失。一般来说，传统范式比较适合于鉴赏现代派文学以外的文学作品，而现代范式则适合于鉴赏现代和后现代文学作品。读者要恰当地把握和运用两种主体介入范式，使之利弊互补。本文所说的“传统”和“现代”是超越时空概念的两种介入方式，并不是“传统”就一定位于前，“现代”就一定位于后；也不是 “现代”为西方所独有，“传统”在中国方多见。这种归纳和表述是前人尚未有过的创新。
[Abstract]:There are many wonderful expositions on the subjectivity of literary appreciation in Chinese and Western literary theories. China In the literary theory of the poem chapter, the poem does not reach the exegesis, with the meaning to oppose the will, the bosom friend, the re-creation and so on viewpoint, And the materialization of the western literary reception theory, the fusion of the horizon, the expectation of the horizon, the two poles, the reading This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the relationship among the author, the text and the reader from the point of view of regular reading. To take a look at. It establishes the subject status of the reader (connoisseur) and affirms the reader's meaning to the text. The right of participation of meaning reveals the interpretation law of "Poet can't stop readers". But there are. The concept expression is inaccurate, exaggerates the reader's function and so on. On the subjectivity of Literary appreciation in Chinese and Western Literary theories, there are two kinds of subjects involved in it. Form, namely "traditional paradigm" and "modern paradigm". The Core of the traditional Paradigm is "approach to the author" The unity of opposites with "creative deviation". The reader may be reproducing the author's intention and textual meaning On the basis of the meaning of limited re-creation. The Core of Modern Paradigm is that readers do not accept text at all This restriction is free to invent and create meaning. Traditional Paradigm can limit Reading properly His "creative deviation" does not make it go too far, but it also makes the reader's imagination and creativity. Force is bound to a certain extent; modern paradigms broaden the space for readers to create freely. However, it can easily lead to the loss of the objective meaning value of the works. Usually. The traditional paradigm is more suitable for appreciating literary works other than modernist literature, while the modern paradigm is more suitable for appreciating literary works other than modernist literature. The paradigm is suitable for appreciating modern and postmodern literary works. Readers should properly grasp and operate Use two kinds of main body to intervene the paradigm, make its advantages and disadvantages complement each other. The "tradition" and "modern" in this paper are the two interventionsof transcending the concept of space-time. Style, "tradition" is not necessarily in the front, "modern" must be in the back; nor is it Modern is unique to the West, and tradition is more common in China. This kind of induction and expression is Innovations that have not yet been created before.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2000
【分类号】：I01

【引证文献】