生态批评的重审与理论新开拓
发布时间:2018-05-15 09:03
本文选题:生态批评 + 反人类中心主义 ; 参考:《中南大学》2005年硕士论文
【摘要】:从二十世纪九十年代中后期起,国内生态批评研究经历了早期的喧嚣、中期的混乱和如今的沉着,走在了一条坎坷的发展之路上。现象往往是某些深层本质的表征,早期生态批评发展的起伏事出有因。 在学界的高度关注中出场后,中国生态批评早期研究全面考察了西方生态批评的发展历程,尝试探索了生态批评的本土化建构,初步发掘了中国古典生态智慧及其现实意义。但学科定位的盲目性、切入角度的混乱性、文本选择的反当下及研究活动的浅表性又是其明显不足,这些技术性缺陷使生态批评渐入困境。 作为早期生态批评的哲理基础,“反人类中心主义”以对生态问题根源的洞察而具理论先锋性,但它也同时导致了生态批评与日常实践的严重分裂。悬搁中心命题并超越中心化思维方式,是重焕生态批评生命力的必要前提。 尽管纵深发展的努力遭遇尴尬,暂时的挫折并未能取消生态批评的现实依据与学术价值。作为对生态危机现实的积极回应,生态文学与批评的批判姿态是对现实主义的传承,而投向“自然”主体的视角则形成了对现实主义的深化。 生态批评必须建立在一定的理论基础之上,“生态理性”与“生态信仰”是生态批评必备的理论支柱。“生态理性”在创作过程中的融贯、在作品内容里的体现是当下生态文学的重要特征,“生态信仰”更是古往今来杰出生态文学的重大主题,它们作为两个理论新范畴的引入,是以提高生态批评的现实针对性、增强生态批评的诠释力度为旨的。
[Abstract]:Since the middle and late 1990s, the domestic ecological criticism research has experienced the early uproar, the middle period chaos and the present calm, has walked on a bumpy road of development. The phenomenon is often the representation of some deep nature, and there are some reasons for the development of early ecological criticism. After the appearance of the academic circles, the early studies of Chinese ecological criticism have comprehensively examined the development course of western ecological criticism, tried to explore the localization of ecological criticism, and preliminarily explored the Chinese classical ecological wisdom and its practical significance. But the blindness of the orientation of the subject, the confusion of the angle, the anti-present of the text selection and the superficial nature of the research activities are its obvious deficiencies, which make the ecological criticism gradually into the dilemma. As the philosophical basis of early ecological criticism, "anti-anthropocentrism" has a theoretical vanguard in terms of insight into the root causes of ecological problems, but it also leads to a serious split between ecological criticism and daily practice. Suspending the central proposition and transcending the central mode of thinking is the necessary prerequisite for reviving the vitality of ecological criticism. In spite of the embarrassment of the deep development efforts, the temporary setback has failed to cancel the realistic basis and academic value of ecological criticism. As a positive response to the reality of ecological crisis, the critical attitude of ecological literature and criticism is the inheritance of realism, while the perspective of "nature" forms the deepening of realism. Ecological criticism must be based on certain theories. Ecological rationality and ecological belief are the necessary theoretical pillars of ecological criticism. The integration of "ecological reason" in the process of creation, the embodiment of the content of the works is an important feature of the present ecological literature, "ecological belief" is an important theme of outstanding ecological literature from ancient to present, and they are introduced as two new theoretical categories. The aim is to improve the realistic pertinence of ecological criticism and strengthen the annotation of ecological criticism.
【学位授予单位】:中南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:I06
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 史秀利;人类的生态危机[D];河北大学;2009年
2 刘晓;对加里·斯奈德选诗的文化分析和生态主义解读[D];四川大学;2007年
3 赵胜杰;虐待自然的代价[D];河北大学;2010年
4 陈木坤;中国当代生态批评“困境”探析[D];江西师范大学;2012年
5 马玲;生态批评视角下的薇拉·凯瑟的作品对比研究[D];大连海事大学;2013年
,本文编号:1891822
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/1891822.html