文学性新释

发布时间：2018-06-02 01:43

本文选题：文学性 + 语境　；参考：《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年02期

【摘要】：自从俄国形式主义理论家罗曼·雅各布森标举"文学性"以来,文学性就成了一个评判文学的重要概念和尺度。但同时也是一个不断引起争议的"理论话语"。合理的文学性规定应该是:文学性等于诗性、语境关联性和诗意对话性。形式主义的文学性是最纯粹最深刻的文学性,但同时也是缩小化的、有着严重局限的文学性,它是一种小文学性;文学的语境关联性和诗意的对话性则是大文学性。文学性具有三层本质和三圈结构:外层为语境关联性;中层为诗意对话性;深层为诗性。诗性不是它的全部,而仅是它的里圈和核心层。今天,小文学性已逐渐为大文学性所包融,诗性、诗意对话性、语境关联性也越来越趋于一种融合态。小文学性与大文学性,或文学性与非文学性之间存在着周期性、或轮回性的互动倾斜关系,文学性最终应是一个周期性的概念。
[Abstract]:Since Russian formalism theorist Roman Jacobson put forward "literariness", literariness has become an important concept and yardstick to judge literature. But it is also a controversial "theoretical discourse". The reasonable literariness should be: literariness is poetic, contextual relevance and poetic dialogue. The literariness of formalism is the purest and most profound literariness, but at the same time, it is also reduced. It is a kind of small literariness with serious limitation, while the relevance of literary context and the dialogue of poetic meaning are big literature. Literariness has three layers of essence and three circle structure: the outer layer is contextual relevance, the middle level is poetic dialogue, and the deep is poetic. Poetry is not all it is, but its inner circle and core. Today, the small literature has been gradually incorporated by the great literature, poetic, poetic dialogue, context relevance is also more and more tend to a state of fusion. There is a periodic or recurrent interaction between small and large literariness, or literariness and non-literariness. Finally, literariness should be a cyclical concept.
【作者单位】：太原师范学院文学院;
【分类号】：I02

【相似文献】