赫伊津哈与弗莱芒文艺复兴

发布时间：2018-06-17 03:27

本文选题：赫伊津哈 + 意大利文艺复兴　；参考：《新美术》2014年01期

【摘要】：正一1919年,当时很多喜欢猜想历史的人都在说:视觉艺术中的主要变化能够为更重大的变革提供有益线索,这些变革很快就会在人类活动的其他领域得到验证。就在这一年,荷兰历史学家约翰·赫伊津哈[Johan Huizinga]出版了一部著作。5年后,此书被译成英文,题为《中世纪的衰落》[The Waning of the Middle Ages]。在这本书中,他认为艺术上一个醒目的创造——扬·凡·艾克及其追随者把"现实主义"引入了15世纪的弗莱芒艺术——并未得到正确的解释。像根特祭坛画这类作品,并非预示了一个新社会的诞生,而应被看作一个迟暮文明的回光返照。在证实这一看法,及对其深意继续进行沉思的过程中,赫伊津哈就艺术与历史想象的关系提出了很多简短、轻松而又深刻的问题。(就我所知)其中只有少数几个问题得到了分析和应有的关注。赫伊津哈对本书所讨论的主旨贡献非凡,是本书提到的最后一位伟大历史学家,只有先花点篇幅了解一下他所研究的问题的背景,我们才可能明白这些贡献的内容和性质。
[Abstract]:In 1919, many people who liked to guess history were saying that major changes in the visual arts could provide useful clues to bigger changes that would soon be tested in other areas of human activity. That same year, the Dutch historian Huizinga [Johan Huizinga] published a book. Five years later, the book was translated into English, the wanted of the Middle Ages. In this book, he argues that a striking artistic creation, Jan Van Eyck and his followers, introduced realism to 15 th century Flemish art and was not properly interpreted. Works like Ghent's altar paintings do not herald the birth of a new society, but should be seen as a reflection of a late civilization. In confirming this view and continuing to meditate on its profound meaning, Huizinga posed a number of brief, relaxed and profound questions about the relationship between art and historical imagination. As far as I know, only a few of these issues have been analysed and given due attention. Huizinga's contribution to the main thrust of the book is remarkable, the last great historian to be mentioned in the book, and it is only possible to understand the content and nature of the contributions by taking a moment to understand the background of the problems he studies.
【分类号】：J110.9

【相似文献】