建国以来文学理论教材建设管窥——以文学分类术语问题为例

发布时间：2018-08-15 13:45

【摘要】：文学理论教材的建设与反思,长期以来一直是文学研究的重点之一。文学分类作为文学理论基础问题,源远流长,是文学理论教材的重要组成部分。建国以来,文学理论教材中文学分类术语问题设置大致经历了"苏化——本土化——西化"的发展历程,大抵对应于"上世纪五十到七十年代"、"八十年代"以及"九十年代至今"三个时段;就关键词来说,又呈现为"‘文学种类’与‘文学体裁’区分使用的仿苏淆乱期——期图以‘文学体裁’整合及其又与‘文学类型’产生淆乱的过渡期——引入‘文类’进行再整合的重建期"三个发展阶段。迄今为止的文学分类术语建设在规范性、统一性、可交互性等方面难尽如人意,同名异实、异名同实的问题普遍,混杂严重。新世纪文学理论建材重建任重道远,必须科学统筹好外来与本土、宏观创构与细节考量等关系。
[Abstract]:The construction and reflection of literary theory textbooks have long been one of the focuses of literary research. Literary classification, as a theoretical basis of literature, has a long history and is an important part of literary theory textbooks. The course of development roughly corresponds to the three periods of "1950s-1970s", "1980s" and "1990s-present". As for the key words, it also presents the confusion period of imitating the Soviet Union, in which "literary genre" and "literary genre" are used separately. The period of integration of "literary genre" and confusion between them and "literary genre" occur. The three stages of development in the reconstruction period of introducing "genre" for re-integration. So far, the construction of literary classification terms is not satisfactory in terms of standardization, uniformity and interactivity. The problems of homonymy, different names and different facts, different names and the same facts are common and mixed seriously. The reconstruction of literary theory building materials in the new century has a long way to go and must be unified scientifically. We should raise the relationship between external and local, macro structure and detailed consideration.
【作者单位】：扬州大学文学院;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金项目(07WXC014)
【分类号】：I0

【参考文献】