当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 艺术理论论文 >

论鸳鸯蝴蝶派与砚友社

发布时间:2018-08-28 08:16
【摘要】:在中日近现代文学史上,有两个不受重视的文学流派,它们分别是中国的鸳鸯蝴蝶派和日本的砚友社。这两个流派虽然成就不是很高,但在传统文学向现代文学的转型过程中却起到了先锋和桥梁的作用。它们在文学实践中所摸索的文化产业化道路以及它们所开创的现代休闲文学,通俗文学,消费文学等文学样式,对今天的文学发展仍然具有借鉴意义。 这两个流派的共同特点是强烈的怀旧情愫,大量地创作言情文学,不约而同地表现市民情结,远离政治而关注个人私生活;而且他们都敏锐地感受到了商业时代的到来,大量运用市场炒作方式,有效地依托于杂志起家,并且不失时机地借助大众媒介,例如报纸刊物、戏剧改编、电影改编,来扩张自己的影响。同时,他们也为了适应市场的需要,大量地开创新型文体,例如日记体、书信体、心理小说等等。正因为通俗的文学主张以及由此而来的内容的浅薄,他们遭遇了新兴文学和进步文学的严厉批评。当然,由于中日社会状况不同,国民心理不同、文化渊源不同,这就产生了两个流派的重大区别,例如砚友社有着明确的文艺理论指导,他们的创作宗旨也就更加明确。而鸳鸯蝴蝶派抗议帝国主义侵略和残酷的军阀统治的等内容,却是砚友社从未涉及过的。 在本文中,笔者将采用比较文学的研究方法,对这两个流派的生成过程、创作特色和它们同现代工业文明和商业社会的关系进行比较研究。通过比较中国鸳鸯蝴蝶派和日本的砚友社来揭示中国和日本两国民族文学的异同,这对增强两国民族文学之间的交流和促进两国文学的共同繁荣有一定的积极作用。
[Abstract]:In the modern literature history of China and Japan, there are two literary schools which are not attached importance to, they are the Mandarin Duck and Butterfly School in China and the Yanyou Society in Japan. Although the achievement of these two schools is not very high, they play a vanguard and bridge role in the transition from traditional literature to modern literature. The road of cultural industrialization they have groped in literary practice and their literary styles of modern leisure literature, popular literature and consumer literature are still of great significance to the development of literature today. The common features of these two schools of thought are strong nostalgia, extensive writing of emotive literature, expression of civic complex in the same way, attention to personal private life away from politics, and they are keenly aware of the arrival of the commercial age. A great deal of market hype is used to build on magazines, and to expand their influence with the help of mass media, such as newspaper, drama and film. At the same time, in order to meet the needs of the market, they create a large number of new styles, such as diary, epistolary, psychological novels and so on. Because of popular literary claims and the resulting shallow content, they met with severe criticism from new and progressive literature. Of course, due to the different social conditions, different national psychology and different cultural origins, there are two major differences between the two schools, such as the Yanyou Society has a clear literary and artistic theory guidance, their creative purpose is more clear. But the Yuanyang and Butterfly faction protested imperialist aggression and cruel warlord rule, but it was never involved in Yanyou Society. In this paper, the author will adopt the method of comparative literature to make a comparative study on the formation process, creative characteristics and their relationship with modern industrial civilization and commercial society of these two schools. By comparing the Chinese Mandarin Duck and Butterfly School with the Yanyou Society of Japan, this paper reveals the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese national literature, which plays a positive role in enhancing the communication between the two countries' national literature and promoting the common prosperity of the two countries' literature.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:I0-03;I106

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前6条

1 任卫平;中日文学交流史略谈[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年01期

2 马兴国;;近代中日文学交流述略[J];日本研究;1992年02期

3 刘立善;;日本近代文坛首个文学社团——砚友社[J];日本研究;2008年02期

4 袁进;中日小说近代变革之比较[J];社会科学;1992年09期

5 孟庆枢;;日本启蒙主义文艺思潮与中国近代文学[J];外国问题研究;1991年03期

6 王向远;中国早期写实主义文学的起源、演变与近代日本的写实主义[J];中国文化研究;1995年04期

中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前2条

1 杨国明;晚清小说与近代商业社会[D];上海师范大学;2003年

2 张登林;上海市民文化与现代通俗小说论[D];上海师范大学;2008年

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前5条

1 汤正宇;从《小说画报》到《星期》——“五四”时期通俗小说研究[D];上海师范大学;2004年

2 张洪涛;泛文化时代的来临[D];浙江师范大学;2006年

3 肖霞;论清末民初文学文本中的“日化”现象[D];苏州大学;2008年

4 刘佳;消闲娱乐:论鸳鸯蝴蝶派创作理论的形成及其内涵[D];苏州大学;2008年

5 吴丽丽;包天笑的都市生活与都市写作[D];上海师范大学;2008年



本文编号:2208817

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2208817.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户29245***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com